Abstract：This paper chooses 12 countries with more research expenditure as the home counties to study the Chinese OFDI reverse technological overspill effect during 1985—2012 with the B-K model, and compares OFDI with domestic research and IFDI. The result shows that all three approaches have positive effects on technical progress. And TFP grows 0.0767% as OFDI grows 1%. Based on the result we recommend that China should further perfect the system of foreign investment and facilitate the foreign investment procedures.
刘宏,薛斌. 中国对外直接投资逆向技术溢出效应及其技术获取路径比较研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2014(11): 109-114.
Liu Hong,Xue Bin. Study on Chinese OFDI Reverse Technological Overspill Effect and Comparison of the Technology Capture Channels. , 2014(11): 109-114.
[1]Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie Frank Lichtenberg. Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology across Borders?[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2001,83(3):490-497. [2]Jürgen Bitzer.Monika Kerekes.Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology across Borders? New Evidence [J].Economics Letters,2008,100. [3]Shireen AlAzzawi. Innovation,Productivity and Foreign Direct Investment-induced R&D Spillovers[J].The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2012. [4]赵伟,古广东,何元庆.外向FDI 与中国技术进步:机理分析与尝试性实证[J].管理世界,2006(7):53-60. [5]李平,宋丽丽.FDI渠道的R＆D溢出、吸收能力与中国技术进步——基于一个扩展的LP方法的实证研究[J].山东大学学报,2009,(4). [6]李梅.人力资本、研发投入与对外直接投资的逆向技术溢出[J].世界经济研究, 2010,(8). [7]刘宏,秦蕾.中国OFDI逆向技术溢出效应对国内技术进步影响的实证研究 [J].中国科技论坛 ,2013,(5). [8]张军,章元.对中国资本存量K的再估计[J].经济研究, 2003,(7).
2014, 
