比较企业优势与中国企业的并购抑或联盟战略选择

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1402 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要中国企业进入发达国家市场时面临“并购抑或联盟？”的战略选择。针对资源基础观解释该问题时存在的局限性,本文创新性地运用了比较企业优势观,在将该理论的意愿内涵诠释为业务剥离意愿的基础上,通过理论分析和案例验证相结合的方法展开了研究。结果表明,比较企业优势和竞争优势的差异组合将对中国企业的战略选择产生不同影响,如果中国企业两种优势均无,则其实施的并购将因发达国家企业对业务剥离的天然抗拒而遭遇很高的风险和成本。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	邢文凤
	刘芳

关键词 ：比较企业优势, 并购, 联盟, 业务剥离意愿

Abstract：Multinational enterprises from China(CMNEs)will choose between M&As(mergers and acquisitions)and alliances when they enter advanced economies.The resource-based view has limitations in explaining why CMNEs make their choices.Hence,the authors adopt the view of comparative firm advantage(CFA),identify the concept of willingness in the theory as the willingness of divestiture,and use the methods combining theoretical analysis and case verifying to fulfill the research.Results show that different portfolios of CFAs and competitive advantages have different impacts on CMNEs' strategic choices.However,if a CMNE proposes an M&A but with neither CFAs nor competitive advantages,it will suffer high risks and costs from the DMNE's instinctive resistance to divestiture

Key words： Comparative firm advantage M&A Alliance Willingness of divestiture

收稿日期: 2014-07-01

PACS:

F271.4

基金资助:天津市高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(20132114),天津市科技计划项目(13ZLZLZF06100)。

作者简介: 邢文凤(1969-),女,辽宁抚顺人,副教授,管理学博士;研究方向:战略管理。

引用本文:

邢文凤, 刘芳. 比较企业优势与中国企业的并购抑或联盟战略选择[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2015(2): 79-84.
Xing Wenfeng,Liu Fang. Comparative Firm Advantages and Chinese Multinational Enterprises' Strategic Choices between M&As and Alliances. , 2015(2): 79-84.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2015/I2/79

[1]阎大颖,任兵,赵奇伟.跨国并购或合资新建——基于制度视角的中国企业对外直接投资模式决策分析[J].山西财经大学学报,2010,32(12):80-87.
[2]Garette B,Dussauge P.Alliances Versus Acquisitions:Choosing the Right Option[J].European Management Journal,2000,18(2):63-69.
[3]Madhok A.Re-assessing the Fundamentals and Beyond:Ronald Coase,the Transaction Cost and Resource-based Theories of the Firm and the Institutional Structure of Production[J].Strategic Management Journal,2002,(23):535-550.
[4]Madhoc A,Li S,Priem R.The Resourced-based View Revisited:Comparative Firm Advantage,Willingness-based Isolating Mechanisms and Competitive Heterogeneity[J].European Management Review,2010,7(2):91-100.
[5]彭明盛.IBM出售PC业务英明与惠普泾渭分明[EB/OL].[2012-01-03].http://tech.qq.com/a/20120103/ 000097.htm.
[6]李强.中国企业战略资产寻求型跨国并购的动因及特征剖析[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2011,26(2):96-102.
[7]Villalonga B,Mcgahan A M.The Choice Among Acquisitions,Alliances,and Divestitures[J].Strategic Management Journal,2005,(26):1183-1208.
[8]李元.联想的国际化之路[J].中国商界,2011,(3):84-87.
[9]海尔官网.海尔携手法格建立波兰新工厂[EB/OL].[2013-09-07].http://www.haier.net/cn/about_haier/news/ jtxx/201309/t20130906_183912.html.
[10]思雨.海尔联合法格集团欧洲设厂满足欧洲用户需求[EB/OL].[2013-09-16].http://news.ccidnet.com/art/ 1032/20130916/5183251_1.html.
[11]法格中国官网.今日法格[EB/OL].[2013-09-10].http://www.Fagorgroup-china.com.
[12]马金城,王磊.所有者弱控制环境下跨国并购整合效率的缺失——以上汽并购双龙为例[J].财经问题研究,2008,(11):105-110.
[13]马倩,郭建鸾,刘福军.上汽收购双龙触礁折射跨境并购难题[J].财务与会计,2010,(1):41-42.
[14]杨丹辉,渠慎宁.私募基金参与跨国并购:核心动机、特定优势及其影响[J].中国工业经济,2009,(3):120-129.