Abstract：This paper studies the jury system that is one of the general public participation practice in environmental decision-making system in abroad. It contains select citizens' juror and panel of expert witnesses and other essential processes.Jury system lies in the background of the coordination of social rationality and technological rationality,as well as changes in representative democracy towards deliberative democracy. Inspiration can be drawn from it is that,the promotion of the public trust and effective collaboration with the government promotion,public participation in various forms to ensure scientific decision-making,in a random manner to ensure representativeness of the participants,to ensure participation quality through interactive questions and discussion ways,to ensure the effectiveness of participation through adequate procedures and institutions
陈幸欢. 英国环境决策公民陪审团制度及镜鉴[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2016(3): 156-160.
Chen Xinghuan. UK's Jury System for Environmental Decision-making and Its Reference. , 2016(3): 156-160.
[1]YOUNG Hee Lee,DAL Yong Jin.An analysis of citizens'jury on the Korean national pandemic response system[J].Javnost-the public,2014,21(3):23-38. [2]WENDY Kenyon,et al.Enhancing environmental decision-making using citizens’ juries[J].Local environment,2003,8(2):222-230. [3]ANDREW Dobson.Listening,the new democratic deficit[J].Political studies,2012,60(4):855-856. [4]谭笑.技术问题决策中的专家话语和公众话语[J].开放时代,2014(6):214. [5]GRAHAM Smith,CORINNE Wales.Citizens’ juries and deliberative democracy[J].Political studies,2000,48:61. [6]RACHAEL Gooberman-hill,et al.Citizens’juries in planning research priorities:process.engagement and outcome[J].Health expectations,2008,11:272-273. [7]迈克尔·波兰尼.个人知识[J].许泽民,译.贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2000. [8]HARRY Collins,ROBERT Evans.Rethinking expertise[M].Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press,2007:20. [9]SHANE Doheny,CLAIRE O'neill.Becoming deliberative citizens:the moral learning process of the citizen juror[J].Political studies,2010,58:647. [10]RACHAEL Gooberman-hill,et al.Citizens’juries in planning research priorities:process.engagement and outcome[J].Health expectations,2008,11:279-280.
2016, 
