Reflection and Prospect of Chinese Standard Copyright:From the Perspective of Multi-Dimensional Standard Property
Lan Qi1,2, Liu Jin3
1.School of Management,China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing),Beijing 100083,China; 2.China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute,Beijing 100029,China; 3.China Commodity Coding Center,Beijing 100013,China
Abstract：For a long time,there has been a lot of controversy on the issue of standard copyrights between the theoretical and practical circles.This paper analyzes the standard property from the dimensions of history,international and copyright,and points out that China's“mandatory standards”and“recommended standards”belong to scientific and technological works and are not classified as laws and regulations.They should be protected by copyright law.This paper from the copyright law of the classification of works,considers that the standard should belong to the special work created in the course of employment.Then the copyright should be owned by the government standardization management department,while standard drafters have the right of authorship.In the future,drawing on the experiences of foreign models,government should gradually abolish the standard drafters signature system,and further expand the scope of free open standards
蓝 麒, 刘 瑾. 中国标准著作权的思考与展望——从多维度下标准的属性出发[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(10): 129-134.
Lan Qi, Liu Jin. Reflection and Prospect of Chinese Standard Copyright:From the Perspective of Multi-Dimensional Standard Property. , 2017(10): 129-134.
[1]李春田.时代呼唤新的标准化法[J].中国标准化,2014(12):50-53. [2]邓红梅,黄静.关于强制性标准法律问题的思考[J].齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报,2011(3):83-85. [3]李长江.关于《中华人民共和国进出口商品检验法修正案(草案)》的说明[EB/OL].http://www.npc.gov.cn/wxzl/gongbao/2002-05/24/content_5295139.htm. [4]《ISO/IEC GUIDE 2:2004》[EB/OL].3.6 regulation:document providing binding legislative rules,that is adopted by an authority.3.6.1 technical regulation:regulation that provides technical requirements,either directly or by referring to or incorporating the content of a standard,technical specification or code of practice.http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=39976. [5]刘三江.强制性标准的性质:文献与展望[J].学术界,2016,213(2):79-89. [6]郭济环.我国技术法规概念刍议[J].科技与法律,2010,84(2):10-13. [7]贺兰.作品独创性的认定方法[N].法治日报,2013-12-18. [8]《ISO annual report 2015》[EB/OL].http://www.iso.org/iso/home/about/annual_reports.htm. [9]刘春青.关注ISO/IEC标准版权保护政策,提高我国标准版权保护意识[J].世界标准化与质量管理,2006(3):25-28. [10]中国标准化研究院.国际标准化发展研究报告[M].北京:中国质检出版社,2015:170. [11]戴宇欣,李佳蔚.美国标准版权保护体系及对我国的启示[J].标准科学,2014(11):76-80. [12]丛立先.职务作品与法人作品辨析——以蒋少武诉沈阳机电装备集团公司案为切入点[J].中国版权,2009(1):61-63. [13]李春田.标准分类理论研究新进展及其意义[J].中国标准导报,2012(1):6-10.
2017, 
