The Impact of Top Management Team Evolution on Megaproject Performance:A Longitudinal Study of Nanning East Railway Station
Wang Ge1,2, He Qinghua1, Bai Ju3, Le Yun1, Li Dongyu4
1.School of Economics and Management,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China; 2.School of Natural and Built Environment,Queen's University Belfast,Belfast BT7 1NN,UK; 3.Infrastructure Business of China State Construction,Beijing 100044,China; 4.China Fortune Land Development Co.,Ltd,Beijing 100027,China
Abstract：From the new perspective of longitudinal study,research hypotheses with regard to the relationship between Top Management Team(TMT)evolution and megaproject performance are proposed,which extends the static view of demographics and further incorporates the team interactive features.By tracing the 22 months implementation process of the infrastructure projects of Nanning East Railway Station,this study indicates that team interactive features have much more impacts on megaproject performance than demographics.Of all demographics(e.g.,age and professional background),only the heterogeneity of professional background has a highly positive correlation with the megaproject performance.Among team interactive features,the internal information exchange and the climate of TMT all have significant positive correlations with the megaproject performance,while the external information exchange and the mutual influence between middle management team and TMT have moderate positive and highly negative correlations with the megaproject performance,respectively.The research findings enrich the theory of TMT,and meanwhile provide practical inspirations for TMT building in the emergence process of China's PPP projects
王 歌, 何清华, 白 居, 乐 云, 李东宇. 高管团队演化对重大工程绩效的影响——基于南宁火车东站项目的纵贯数据研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(10): 160-167.
Wang Ge, He Qinghua, Bai Ju, Le Yun, Li Dongyu. The Impact of Top Management Team Evolution on Megaproject Performance:A Longitudinal Study of Nanning East Railway Station. , 2017(10): 160-167.
[1]中国经济网.国家统计局五位司长解读2016年中国经济“年报”[EB/OL].(2017-03-08)[2017-01-22].http://www.ce.cn/macro/more/201701/22/t20170122_19799319.shtml. [2]FLYVBJERG B.What you should know about megaprojects and why:an overview[J].Project management journal,2014,45(2):6-19. [3]吴瀚,姚小涛.以基于内部互动的社会资本视角再看高层管理团队[J].管理学报,2012,9(9):1300-1306. [4]HAMBRICK D C,MASON P A.Upper echelons:The organization as a reflection of its top managers[J].Academy of management review,1984,9(2):193-206. [5]FLYVBJERG B.Truth and lies about megaprojects[R].Inaugural Speech for Professorship and Chair at Faculty of Technology,Policy,and Management:Delft University of Technology,2007. [6]RICHARD O C,SHELOR R M.Linking top management team age heterogeneity to firm performance:Juxtaposing two mid-range theories[J].International journal of human resource management,2002,13(6):958-974. [7]BANTEL K A,JACKSON S E.Top management and innovations in banking:Does the composition of the top team make a difference?[J].Strategic management journal,1989,10(S1):107-124. [8]SIMONS T L,Peterson R S.Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams:the pivotal role of intragroup trust[J].Journal of applied psychology,2000,85(1):102. [9]姚振华,孙海法.高管团队组成特征与行为整合关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2010(1):15-22. [10]BRAUN T,FERREIRA A I,SYDOW J.Citizenship behavior and effectiveness in temporary organizations[J].International journal of project management,2013,31(6):862-876. [11]HOPE Pelled L.Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance:a field investigation[J].International journal of conflict management,1996,7(3):230-24. [12]吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010. [13]乐云,白居,韩冰,等.重大工程高管团队的行为整合,战略决策与工程绩效[J].中国科技论坛,2016(12):98-104.
2017, 
