数据本地化的影响与政策动因研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (1)

全文: PDF (1113 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要数据本地化在国际上引起了广泛的关注和争论,主要在数据安全、产业保护以及国际贸易与投资等方面产生影响。在跨境数据流动规制的方式选择上,存在显著的差异化现象。美国主张数据自由流动,欧盟注重隐私规制,大量发展中国家则偏好数据本地化政策。这是各经济体基于自身信息技术水平和隐私保护意识,追求规制净收益最大化的结果。本文对中国根据国内条件变化尽快转向隐私规制提出了具体建议。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	黄宁

关键词 ：数据本地化, 跨境数据流动, 隐私规制, 政策动因

Abstract：Data localization has attracted worldwide attention and controversy.It mainly affects data security,industry protection and international trade and investment.There are obvious differences in the choice of regulation of transborder data flows.The U.S.advocates free flows of data,the EU focuses on privacy regulation,while a large number of developing countries prefer data localization policies.This is because each economy pursues maximization of regulation net profit,based on its own level of information technology and privacy awareness.This paper puts forward some suggestions for China to turn to privacy regulation as soon as possible,as its domestic conditions are changing quickly.

Key words： Data localization Transborder data flow Privacy regulation Policy motivation

收稿日期: 2017-05-02

PACS:

F741.2

基金资助:中国科协高端科技创新智库青年项目(DXB-ZKQN-2016-001)。

作者简介: 黄宁(1987-),男,山东人,南开大学经济与社会发展研究院与中国科学技术发展战略研究院联合博士后工作站;研究方向:国际规则与科技政策。

引用本文:

黄宁. 数据本地化的影响与政策动因研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(9): 161-168.
Huang Ning. Impacts of Data Localization and Its Policy Motivations. , 2017(9): 161-168.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2017/I9/161

[1] McKinsey Global Institute.Digital Globalization:The New Era of Global Flows[R].February 2016.http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/digital-globalization-the-new-era-of-global-flows.
[2]CHANDER Anupam,LE Uyên.Data Nationalism[J].Emory law journal,2015(64):679-704.
[3]U.S.Chamber of Commerce.Business Without Borders:The Importance of Cross-Border Data Transfers to Global Prosperity[R].May 12,2014. https://www.uschamber.com/report/business-without-borders-importance-cross-border-data-transfers-global-prosperity.
[4]MOOHAN Gisela,MORTON Elizabeth,et al.Transborder data flow:a review of issues and policies[J].Library review,1988(37):33.
[5]BORTNICK Jane.International information flow:the developing world perspective[J].Cornell international law journal,1981(14):342.
[6]DAMON Lisa.Freedom of information versus national sovereignty:the need for a new global forum for the resolution of transborder date flow problems[J].Fordham international law journal,1986(10):277.
[7]CHANDER Anupam,LE Uyên.Data nationalism[J].Emory law journal,2015(64):679-704.
[8]中央网络安全和信息化领导小组办公室政策法规局.外国网络法选编(第一辑):美国·俄罗斯[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2015.
[9]STONE Susan,MESSENT James,FLAIG Dorothee.Emerging policy issues:localisation barriers to trade[R].OECD Trade Policy Papers,No.180,2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js1m6v5qd5j-en.
[10]MILLARD Christopher.Forced localization of cloud services:Is privacy the real driver?[J].IEEE cloud computing,2015(2):10-14.
[11]新华网.谷歌承认把欧洲资料交给美国情报机构[EB/OL].(2011-08-16)[2017-04-21].http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2011-08/16/c_121867891.htm.
[12]CASTRO Daniel.The false promise of data nationalism[R].Information technology and innovation foundation.2013,https://itif.org/publications/2013/12/09/false-promise-data-nationalism.
[13]CHAO Loretta,TREVISANI Paulo.Brazil legislators bear down on internet bill[EB/OL].Wall St.J.(2013-11-13)[2017-04-21].http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304868404579194290325348688.
[14]MOOHAN Gisela,MORTON Elizabeth,et al.Transborder data flow:a review of issues and policies[J].Library review,1988(37):33.
[15]Swedish Board of Commerce.No transfer,no production-a report on cross-border data transfers,global value chains,and the production of goods[R].2015.http://www.kommers.se/In-English/Publications/2015/No-Transfer-No-Production/
[16]LENDLE Andreas,OLARREAGA Marcelo,SCHROPP Simon,VEZINA Pierre.There goes gravity:How eBay reduces trade costs[R].World Bank Policy Research Paper,No.6253,2012.http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6253.
[17]McKinsey Global Institute.Digital globalization:the new Era of global flows[R].February 2016.http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/digital-globalization-the-new-era-of-global-flows.
[18]U.S.International Trade Commission.Digital trade in the U.S.and global economies,part 2[R].USITC Publication 4485,August 2014. https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4485.pdf.
[19]Microsoft,Google,Adobe Leave Russia Due to Putin’s New Laws[EB/OL].(2014-12-15)[2017-04-21].http://news.softpedia.com/news/Microsoft-Google-Adobe-Leave-Russia-Due-to-Putin-s-New-Laws-467521.shtml.
[20]戴恩·罗兰德,伊丽莎白·麦克唐纳.信息技术法:第2版[M].宋连斌,林一飞,吕国民,译.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2004:308.
[21]孔令杰.个人资料隐私的法律保护[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2009:145.
[22]韩静雅.跨境数据流动国际规制的焦点问题分析[J].河北法学,2016,34(10):170-178.
[23]AHMED Usman,CHANDER Anupam.Information goes global:protecting privacy,security,and the new economy in a world of cross-border data flows[R].E15Initiative.Geneva:International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development(ICTSD) and World Economic Forum,2015.
[24]齐爱民.拯救信息社会中的人格:个人信息保护法总论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009:173.
[25]高富平.个人数据保护和利用国际规则:源流与趋势[M].北京:法律出版社,2016:135.
[26]MOOHAN Gisela,MORTON Elizabeth,et al.Transborder data flow:a review of issues and policies[J].Library review,1988(37):31-32.
[27]STONE Susan,MESSENT James,FLAIG Dorothee.Emerging policy issues:localisation barriers to trade[R].OECD trade policy papers,No.180,2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js1m6v5qd5j-en.
[28]中国青年政治学院互联网法治研究中心.中国个人信息安全和隐私保护报告[R].2016.
[29]新华网.2016年的云计算,是一场互联网巨头们的多维战争[EB/OL].(2016-12-12)[2017-04-23].http://www.hq.xinhuanet.com/news/2016-12/12/c_1120099550.htm.