R&D联盟模块化水平、内部风险与治理结构实证研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(34)
相关文章 (6)

全文: PDF (5718 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本研究探讨了模块化对R&D联盟内部风险、治理结构的影响,基于知识基础观和交易成本理论的视角对R&D联盟模块化、内部风险、治理结构进行了系统性讨论,并通过多个地区R&D联盟的大样本数据进行实证检验。研究结果表明:R&D联盟的模块化水平降低了机会主义威胁,并且降低了不协调性风险;机会主义威胁高时R&D联盟倾向于紧密的结构模式与复杂的合同,而当不协调性风险高时倾向于复杂的合同;模块化水平高时R&D联盟不倾向于复杂的合同,亦不倾向于紧密的结构。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张煜
	龙勇

关键词 ：模块化, 机会主义威胁, 不协调性风险, 联盟治理结构

Abstract：This paper discusses the influence of modularity on the endogenous risk and governance structure of R&D alliance.And then,it discusses the relationship among modularity and endogenous risk and governance structure of R&D alliance on the basis of knowledge-based view and transaction cost theory.The results show that the modularity of the R&D alliance reduces the opportunistic threat and the uncoordinated risk.When the opportunistic threat is high,the R&D alliance tends to be in close structural and complex contracts;when the uncoordinated risk is high,the R&D alliance tends to be a complex contract;when the the modular level is high,R&D alliance does not tend to be complex contracts,nor tends to be tight structure.

Key words： Modularity Opportunistic threat Uncoordinated risk Alliance governance structure

收稿日期: 2017-06-06

PACS:

F273.7

基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目“整合 TCE 和RBT 视角下的战略联盟资产与治理关系研究”(71172081),高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金“基于供应链协同的联盟模式与创新类型关系研究”(20110191110031)。

作者简介: 张煜(1984-),男,湖北黄石人,重庆大学经济与工商管理学院博士研究生;研究方向:战略合作,技术创新。

引用本文:

张煜, 龙勇. R&D联盟模块化水平、内部风险与治理结构实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(4): 33-40.
Zhang Yu, Long Yong. An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Modularity,Endogenous Risk and Governance Structure of R&D Alliance. , 2018(4): 33-40.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2018/I4/33

[1]SAMPSON R C.Organizational choice in R&D alliances:knowledge-based and transaction cost perspectives[J].Managerial and decision economics,2004,25(6-7):421-436.
[2]DOZ Y L,HAMEL G.联盟优势[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004.
[3]汪谷腾,龙勇.知识模块化对联盟治理机制的影响——基于知识密集联盟的实证研究[J].经济与管理研究,2016,37(11):135-144.
[4]HOETKER G,MELLEWIGT T.Choice and performance of governance mechanisms:matching alliance governance to asset type[J].Strategic management journal,2009,30:1025-1044.
[5]OXLEY J,WADA T.Alliance structure and the scope of knowledge transfer:evidence from U.S.-Japan agreements[J].Management science,2009,55(4):635-649.
[6]FAEMS D,JANSSENS M,VAN LOOY B.Managing the co-operation-competition dilemma in R&D alliance:a multiple case study in the advanced materials industry[J].Creativity and innovation management,2010,19(1):467-489.
[7]青木昌彦.比较制度分析[M].上海:上海远东出版社,2001.
[8]王芳,赵兰香.重大科技项目模块化创新管理方法研究——对美国国防采办管理方法的探析[J].科研管理,2009,30(1):1-7.
[9]SANCHEZ R.Creating modular platforms for strategic flexibility[J].Design management review,2004,15(1):58-67.
[10]TIWANA A.Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance? A field study of software outsourcing alliance[J].Strategic management journal,2008,29(11):1241-1252.
[11]SCHILLING M A.Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm modularity[J].Academy of management reviews,2000(25):321-334.
[12]BALDWIN C Y,CLARK K B.Managing in an age of modularity[J].Harvard business review,1997,75(5):84-93.
[13]聂鹰.竞争性战略联盟效率边界的内生因素研究[D].重庆大学博士论文,2010.
[14]WILLIAMSON O E.资本主义经济制度[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007.
[15]WILLIAMSON O E.Transaction cost economics:How it works;Where it is headed[J].DE economist,1998,146:23-58.
[16]YANG J,WANG J,WONG C W Y,LAI K H.Relational stability and alliance performance in supply chain[J].Omega-international journal of management science,2008,36(4):600-608.
[17]LUO Yadong.Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances[J].Strategic management journal,2008(29):27-46.
[18]TEECE D J.Competition,cooperation,and innovation:organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress[J].Journal of economic behavior and organization,1992,18:1-25.
[19]OXLEY J E.Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances:a transaction cost approach[J].The journal of law,economics and organization,1997,13(2):387-409.
[20]龙勇,李薇.竞争性联盟内生合作效应的中介效应分析[J].科研管理,2009,30(4):97-104.
[21]TIWANA A.Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing[J].Strategic management journal,2008,29(7):769-780.
[22]聂鹰,龙勇.契约联盟中的知识泄漏风险与合同治理——技术模块化的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(5):133-137.
[23]LAU A K W,YAM R C M,TANG E P Y.The impact of product modularity on new product performance:mediation by product innovativeness[J].Journal of product innovation management,2011,28(2):270-284.
[24]REUER J J,ARINO A.Strategic alliance contracts:dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity[J].Strategic management journal,2007,28:313-330.
[25]聂辉华,李金波.资产专用性、敲竹杠和纵向一体化[J].经济学家,2008(4):1-9.
[26]ZINELDIN M.Co-opetition:the organization of the future[J].Marketing intelligence & planning,2004,22(6/7):780-789.
[27]GULATI R,SINGH H.The architecture of cooperation:managing coordination uncertainty and interdependence in strategic alliances[J].Administrative science quarterly,1998,43(4):781-814.
[28]SANTORO M D,MCGILL J P.The effect of uncertainty and asset co-specialization on governance in biotechnology alliances[J].Strategic management journal,2005,26:1261-1269.
[29]WANG L,ZAJAC E J.Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations[J].Strategic management journal,2007,28(13):1291-1317.
[30]OXLEY J E,SAMPSON R C.The scope and governance of international R&D alliances[J].Strategic management journal,2004,25(8-9):723-749.
[31]CUI C C,BALL D F,COYNE J.Working effectively in strategic alliances through managerial fit between partners:some evidence from Sino-British joint ventures and the implications for R&D professionals[J].R&D management,2002,32(4):343-357.
[32]COMINO S,MARIEL P,SANDONIS J.Joint ventures versus contractual agreements:an empirical investigation[J].Spanish economic review,2007,9(3):159-175.
[33]POPPO L,ZENGER T.Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements[J].Strategic management journal,2002(23):707-725.
[34]SCHONFELD E.The great giveway[J].Business 2.0,2005(4):81-86.