Comparison of Innovation Output and Innovation Characteristics Between State-Owned Enterprises and Non-State-Owned Enterprises ——Empirical Evidence from Guangzhou Enterprise Innovation Survey 2016 and Wind Database
Cao Siwei, Cai Suibao, Yang Yang, Ye Jingyi
Business School,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
Abstract：Using the data of Guangzhou enterprises innovation survey in 2016 and regression analysis,this paper finds that there is no significant difference in innovation output between state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises in Guangzhou,but state-owned enterprises enjoy a larger economy of scale in innovation;meanwhile,state-owned enterprises pay more attention to independent R&D and cooperative R&D than non-state-owned enterprises.Non-state-owned enterprises prefer technology transfer,purchase and M&A.Therefore,for state-owned enterprises,the policy recommendation is to increase R&D support,raise tenure standards and relax budget constraint for hiring high-tech employees.To spur innovation from private enterprises,we recommend to improve institution efficiency and build innovation platform to cater to the need of,especially,small and medium-sized enterprises.
曹思未, 蔡随宝, 杨洋, 叶静怡. 国有企业和非国有企业的创新产出与创新特征分析——基于2016年广州市创新调查和Wind数据库的实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(6): 102-108.
Cao Siwei, Cai Suibao, Yang Yang, Ye Jingyi. Comparison of Innovation Output and Innovation Characteristics Between State-Owned Enterprises and Non-State-Owned Enterprises ——Empirical Evidence from Guangzhou Enterprise Innovation Survey 2016 and Wind Database. , 2019(6): 102-108.
[1]ZHANG A,ZHANG Y,ZHAO R.A study of the R&D efficiency and productivity of Chinese firms[J].Journal of comparative economics,2003,31(3):444-464. [2]董晓庆,赵坚,袁朋伟.国有企业创新效率损失研究[J].中国工业经济,2014(2):97-108. [3]平新乔,范瑛,郝朝艳.中国国有企业代理成本的实证分析[J].经济研究,2003(11):42-53. [4]BERLINER J S.The innovation decision in Soviet industry[J].Business history review,1976,52(4):582-584. [5]QIAN Y,XU C.Innovation and bureaucracy under soft and hard budget constraints[J].The review of economic studies,1998,65(1):151-164. [6]朱有为,徐康宁.中国高技术产业研发效率的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(11):38-45. [7]SCHERER F M,ROSS D.Economic performance[M].Boston:Houghton-Mifflin,1990. [8]PAVITT K,ROBSON M,TOWNSEND J.The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK:1945—1983[J].The journal of industrial economics,1987:297-316. [9]张维迎.国有企业改革出路何在[J].经济社会体制比较,1996(1). [10]张维迎.从现代企业理论看国企改革[J].改革,1995. [11]刘芍佳,李骥.超产权论与企业绩效[J].经济研究,1998. [12]林毅夫.国企改革的核心是创造竞争的环境[J].改革,1995. [13]LI S.The roles and performance of state firms and Non-State Firms in China′s economic transition[J].World development,2008,36(1):39-54. [14]刘小玄.中国工业企业的所有制结构对效率差异的影响——1995年全国工业企业普查数据的实证分析[J].经济研究,2000(2):17-25. [15]姚洋,章奇.中国工业企业技术效率分析[J].经济研究,2001(10):13-19. [16]周立群,邓路.企业所有权性质与研发效率——基于随机前沿函数的高技术产业实证研究[J].当代经济科学,2009,31(4):70-75. [17]吴延兵.不同所有制企业技术创新能力考察[J].产业经济研究,2014(2):53-64. [18]JEFFERSON G H,HUAMAO B,XIAOJING G,et al.R&D performance in Chinese industry[J].Economics of innovation and new technology,2006,15(4-5):345-366. [19]赵晓民,金春雨,Ping Lan.国有企业与非国有企业新产品创新行为与绩效的对比研究[J].时代经贸,2014(7). [20]叶静怡,林佳,张鹏飞,等.中国国有企业的独特作用——基于知识溢出的视角[D].北京:北京大学,2018.
2019, 
