Abstract:The article focuses on the innovation study literature data of UTD24 from 2000 to 2017 and performs a comprehensive measurement from citation structure,scientific influence,cross-countries collaborative network,hot topics and frontiers by using scientometrical analysis,social network analysis and burst detection.Results indicate innovation research literatures in the UTD24 journals show strong knowledge diffusion capacity.The United States remains the center of scientific activity for world innovation research and has strong scientific influence and cooperation attraction.China has gradually become an important member of the stably expanded cross-countries collaborative network of global innovation research,but network influence is significantly lower than that of the United States.Innovation research presents multiple levels and richness.Innovative internal process and management research has become an important topic of long-term common concern for scholars around the world.China pays more attention to indigenous innovation,but it is relatively insufficient to discuss the pre-factors and subjects of innovation.Crowdsourcing,venture capital,online community,creativity and adaptation are global frontier issues and should be given attention to.
张春阳, 丁堃. 商学领域创新研究趋势测度——基于UTD24种期刊的分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(8): 10-17.
Zhang Chunyang, Ding Kun. Measurement on Research Trend of Innovation in Business Field: Based on the Analysis of UTD 24 Journals. , 2019(8): 10-17.
[1]MERIGÓ J M,CANCINO C A,CORONADO F,et al.Academic research in innovation:A country analysis[J].Scientometrics,2016,108 (2):559-593. [2]FAGERBERG J,VERSPAGEN B.Innovation studies:The emerging structure of a new scientific field[J].Researchpolicy,2009,38 (2):218-233. [3]MARTINB R.The evolution of science policy and innovation studies[J].Research policy,2012,41 (7):1219-1239. [4]栾春娟,陈悦,侯海燕.国际创新研究核心期刊的计量及可视化分析[J].技术与创新管理,2010,31 (1):1-4,8. [5]张秀萍,王振.社会网络在创新领域应用研究的知识图谱——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J].经济管理,2017,39 (10):192-208. [6]CANCINO C,MERIGÓ J M,CORONADO F C.Big names in innovation research:A bibliometric overview[J].Currentscience,2017,113 (8):1507-1518. [7]柳卸林,张可.傅家骥与创新管理研究的中国化[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35 (11):3-12. [8]陈劲,吕文晶.创新研究:学科演变与中国贡献[J].技术经济,2018,37 (5):1-13. [9]杜德斌,何舜辉.全球科技创新中心的内涵、功能与组织结构[J].中国科技论坛,2016 (2):10-15. [10]THIEME J.Perspective:The world′s top innovation management scholars and their social capital[J].Journal of product innovation management,2007,24 (3):214-229. [11]SHAFIQUE M.Thinking inside the box?Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988—2008)[J].Strategicmanagement journal,2013,34 (1):62-93. [12]APPIO F P,MARTINI A,MASSA S,et al.Unveiling the intellectual origins of social media-based innovation:Insights from a bibliometric approach[J].Scientometrics,2016,108 (1):355-388. [13]BUTLER D.Computing giants launch free science metrics[J].Nature,2011,476 (7358):18-18. [14]MOLINARI J F,MOLINARI A.A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions[J].Scientometrics,2008,75 (1):163-174. [15]PRATHAP G.The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index[J].Scientometrics,2010,84 (1):167-172. [16]BORNMANN L,DE MOYA-ANEGÓN F,LEYDESDORFF L.The new excellence indicator in the world report of the SCI magoinstitutions rankings 2011[J].Journal of informetrics,2012,6 (2):333-335. [17]MAY R M.The scientific wealth of nations[J].Science,1997,275 (5301):793-796. [18]GUAN J C,GAO X.Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics[J].Scientometrics,2008,75 (2):357-379. [19]BAJWA R S,YALDRAM K,RAFIQUE S.A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology:pakistan perspective[J].Scientometrics,2013,94 (1):333-342. [20]SCHUBERT A,BRAUN T.Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact[J].Scientometrics,1986,9 (5-6):281-291. [21]谭春辉,曾娟,邱均平.基于CSSCI的 “十二五”时期国内情报学研究态势分析[J].情报学报,2017,36 (7):734-747. [22]KLEINBERG J.Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams[J].Data mining and knowledge discovery,2003,7 (4):373-397.