客观知识的科技风险沟通作用真的失效了么——兼论转基因技术科普策略的选择

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (6851 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本研究通过预置模型、问卷调查、结构方程,对客观知识对转基因技术风险沟通的作用机制进行探索。研究发现,客观知识对转基因技术风险沟通不具有显著直接效应,而主观知识可精准地替代客观知识,对转基因技术风险感知有显著预测作用,客观知识、主观知识能分别通过启发科学理性和削弱社会理性的机制作用于风险感知,从而间接影响转基因技术的公众态度。当前阶段转基因技术科普的核心是知识合法性的优先确立,以为公众理解和公众参与阶段奠定基础。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	庞祯敬
	蒋鼎汗

关键词 ：转基因技术, 客观知识, 科学理性, 社会理性, 风险感知

Abstract：This paper explores the mechanism of objective knowledge on risk communication of GM technology by preset models,questionnaires and structural equations.It is found that objective knowledge has no significant direct effect on the risk communication of GM technology,while subjective knowledge can accurately replace objective knowledge,which has a significant predictive effect on the risk perception of GM technology.Objective knowledge and subjective knowledge can indirectly affect the public attitudes of GM technology through the mechanism of enlightening scientific rationality and weakening social rationality.At present,the core of the popularization of GM technology is to establish the legitimacy of knowledge in order to lay the foundation for public understanding and public participation.

Key words： GM technology Subjective knowledge Scientific rationality Social rationality Risk perception

收稿日期: 2020-03-12

PACS:

G315

基金资助:国家社会科学基金西部项目(19XZZ007),教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(20YJA630068)。

作者简介: 庞祯敬 (1989-),四川绵阳人,清华大学公共管理学院博士后,清华大学中国科技政策研究中心助理研究员;研究方向:新兴技术治理。

引用本文:

庞祯敬, 蒋鼎汗. 客观知识的科技风险沟通作用真的失效了么——兼论转基因技术科普策略的选择[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(12): 144-153.
Pang Zhenjing, Jiang Dinghan. Does the Objective Knowledge Really not Work ——Questions on the Way of Science Popularization of GM Technology. , 2020(12): 144-153.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2020/I12/144

[1]BOURDIEU P.Social space and symbolic power[J].Sociological theory,1989,7(1):14-25.
[2]DURANT J R,EVANS G A,THOMAS G P.The public understanding of science[J].Nature,1989,340(6228):11.
[3]GASKELL G,ALLUM N,BAUER M,et al.Biotechnology and the European public[J].Nature biotechnology,2000,18(9):935.
[4]SJÖBERG L.Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust[J].Risk analysis,2001,21(1):189-198.
[5]BROSSARD D,NISBET M C.Deference to scientific authority among a low information public:understanding US opinion on agricultural biotechnology[J].International journal of public opinion research,2007,19(1):24-52.
[6]CONNOR M,SIEGRIST M.Factors influencing people's acceptance of gene technology:the role of knowledge,health expectations,naturalness,and social trust[J].Science communication,2010,32(4):514-538.
[7]MIELBY H,SANDØE P,LASSEN J.The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies[J].Public understanding of science,2013,22(2):155-168.
[8]LUPIA A.Communicating science in politicized environments[J].Proceedings of the national academy of sciences,2013,110(Supplement 3):14048-14054.
[9]DRUCKMAN J N,BOLSEN T.Framing,motivated reasoning,and opinions about emergent technologies[J].Journal of communication,2011,61(4):659-688.
[10]范敬群,贾鹤鹏.极化与固化:转基因“科普”的困境分析与路径选择[J].中国生物工程杂志,2015,35(6):124-130.
[11]严俊,李婷婷.有限理性行动者的偏好变化与行为策略:一个初步的理论模型[J].社会学评论,2018,6(6):16-28.
[12]DAVIS F D,BAGOZZI R P,WARSHAW P R.User acceptance of computer technology:a comparison of two theoretical models[J].Management science,1989,35(8):982-1003.
[13]MITCHELL V W.Consumer perceived risk:conceptualisations and models[J].European journal of marketing,1999,33(1/2):163-195.
[14]HORNIBROOK S A,MCCARTHY M,FEARNE A.Consumers' perception of risk:the case of beef purchases in Irish supermarkets[J].International journal of retail & distribution management,2005,33(10):701-715.
[15]BREDAHL L,GRUNERT K G,FREWER L J.Consumer attitudes and decision-making with regard to genetically engineered food products:a review of the literature and a presentation of models for future research[J].Journal of consumer policy,1998,21(3):251-277.
[16]SIEGRIST M.A causal model explaining the perception and acceptance of gene technology 1[J].Journal of applied social psychology,1999,29(10):2093-2106.
[17]GRUNERT K G,BREDAHL L,SCHOLDERER J.Four questions on European consumers' attitudes toward the use of genetic modification in food production[J].Innovative food science & emerging technologies,2003,4(4):435-445.
[18]MAGNUSSON M K,HURSTI U K K.Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods[J].Appetite,2002,39(1):9-24.
[19]SIEGRIST M,COUSIN M E,KASTENHOLZ H,et al.Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging:the influence of affect and trust[J].Appetite,2007,49(2):459-466.
[20]BRUCE T W,YEE W M S,LUSK J L,et al.Perceptions of the risks and benefits of genetically-modified foods and their influence on willingness to consume[J].Acta agriculturae scand section C,2006,3(1):12-19.
[21]CHEN M F,LI H L.The consumer's attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan[J].Food quality and preference,2007,18(4):662-674.
[22]PRATI G,PIETRANTONI L,ZANI B.The prediction of intention to consume genetically modified food:test of an integrated psychosocial model[J].Food quality and preference,2012,25(2):163-170.
[23]IISAAC G E,KERR W A.Genetically modified organisms at the world trade organization:a harvest of trouble[J].Journal of world trade,2003,37(6):1083-1095.
[24]王超,李奇伟.“黄金大米”:风险时代技术理性的失范与规约[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,13(2):109-117.
[25]毛新志.“实质等同性”原则与“转基因食品”的安全性[J].科学学研究,2004(6):578-582.
[26]黄彪文.转基因争论中的科学理性与社会理性的冲突与对话:基于大数据的分析[J].自然辩证法研究,2016,32(11):60-65.
[27]王奋宇,卢阳旭,何光喜.对我国科技公共治理问题的若干思考[J].中国软科学,2015(1):1-13.
[28]龙强,吴飞.社会理性、日常抵抗与反专家话语——当代中国科学传播失灵及其调适[J].当代传播,2016(5):48-50.
[29]WYNNE B.Social identities and public uptake of science[J].Radioactivity in the environment,2013,19:283-309.
[30]FISHBEIN M.An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object[J].Human relations,1963,16(3):233-239.
[31]HAMSTRA A M,SMINK C.Consumers and biotechnology in the netherlands[J].British food journal,1996,98(4/5):34-38.
[32]HOBAN T J.Trends in consumer attitudes about agricultural biotechnology[J].AgBioForum,1998,1(1):3-7.
[33]GASKELL G,ALLUM N,STARES S.Europeans and biotechnology in 2002:Eurobarometer 58.0[R].Brussels:European Commission,2003.
[34]HEBDEN W C,SHIN H K,HALLMAN W K.Consumer responses to GM foods:why are Americans so different[J].Choices:the magazine of food,farm,and resource issues,2005,20(4):243-253.
[35]CHEN M F,LI H L.The consumer's attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan[J].Food quality and preference,2007,18(4):662-674.[36]BREDAHL L.Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food:results of a cross-national survey[J].Journal of consumer policy,2001,24(1):23-61.
[37]LI Q,CURTIS K R,MCCLUSKEY J J,et al.Consumer attitudes toward genetically modified foods in Beijing,China[J].AgBioForum,2002,5(4):145-152.
[38]HOUSE L,LUSK J,JAEGER S,et al.Objective and subjective knowledge:impacts on consumer demand for genetically modified foods in the United States and the European Union[J].AgBioForum,2005,7(1):113-121.
[39]李正伟,刘兵.公众理解科学的理论研究:约翰·杜兰特的缺失模型[J].科学对社会的影响,2003(3):12-15.
[40]LUSK J L,HOUSE L O,VALLI C,et al.Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food:evidence from experimental auctions in the United States,England,and France[J].European review of agricultural economics,2004,31(2):179-204.
[41]BREDAHL L.Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food-results of a cross-national survey[J].Journal of consumer policy,2001,24(1):23-61.
[42]毛新志,李思雯,张萌,等.公众对转基因水稻的认知、产业化态度和行为导向分析——基于湖北省的调查数据[J].自然辩证法通讯,2012,34(5):18-25+125.
[43]SIEGRIST M.The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology[J].Risk analysis,2000,20(2):195-204.
[44]ROSE K M,HOWELL E L,SU Y F,et al.Distinguishing scientific knowledge:the impact of different measures of knowledge on genetically modified food attitudes[J].Public understanding of science,2019,28(4):449-467.
[45]FERNBACH P M,LIGHT N,SCOTT S E,et al.Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most[J].Nature human behaviour,2019,3(1):251-256.
[46]FRANCISCO F,LACKNER S,GONALVES-S Ja.A little knowledge is a dangerous thing:excess confidence explains negative attitudes towards science[J].Ssrn electronic journal,2019,3(3):1-16.