Abstract：How to promote the integration of science & technology policy and industrial policy from the macro and overall perspective has been a hot topic.However, the current discussion seems to pay more attention to policy incremental perspective hence to believe the integration of science & technology policy and industrial policy shall be answered by promoting science & technology achievement industrialization.The problem is that the integration of science & technology policy and industrial policy is a cognitive task with high sophistication which cannot solve the problem without cognitive analysis of the decision-makers.The contradiction between the national strategic demand and specific policy supply is more sharp in emerging high-tech fields such as new material, chips and so on.This papers points out the policy incremental perspective fits from cognitive analysis of the decision-makers by providing key background knowledge and structural cognitive tools, breaking the mindset of a specific system and avoiding the risk of excessive science & technology achievement industrialization.The policy incremental perspective shall be further understood and utilized.
[1]张五常.中国的经济制度[M].北京:中信出版社, 2008. [2]BAKVIS Herman, BROWNY Douglas.Policy coordination federal systems:comparing intergovernmental processes[J].The journal of federalism, 2010, 40 (3):484-507. [3]刘鹤.推动全球机器人领域开放合作发展造福社会[EB/OL]. (2018-08-16)[2019-09-25].http://tech.163.com/18/0816/10/DPAUNN73000998SL.html. [4]JOHNSON Chalmers.MITI and the Japanese miracle[M].California:Stanford University Press, 1982. [5]MIGDAL Joel, KOHLI Atul, SHUE Vivienne.State power and social forces:domination and transformation in the third world[M].New York:Cambridge University Press, 1994. [6]WADE Robert.Governing the market:economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization[M].New Jersy:Princeton University Press, 1990. [7]LAMPTON David.Policy implementation in post-Mao China[M].Berkeley:University of California Press, 1987. [8]LIEBERTHA Kenneth, LAMPTON David.Bureaucracy, politics and decision making in post-Mao China[M].California:University of California Press, 1992. [9]封颖.科技政策体系体现环境保护的宏观演变格局研究:1949—2015年[J].中国科技论坛, 2017 (9):5-15. [10]I Policy政策分析系统在线平台[EB/OL]. [2019-09-25].http://39.105.58.246/ipolicy/#&curpage=1&pagesize=50. [11]李义春.工信部 《新材料产业 “十二五”重点产品目录》[M].李义春.中国新材料发展年鉴 (2011—2012年).哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社, 2013. [12]国家统计局令第23号.战略性新兴产业分类 (2019)[EB/OL]. (2018-11-26)[2019-09-25].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgz/tzgb/201811/t20181126_1635848.html. [13]封颖.科技小系统与国家大系统的政策差异研究[J].科学学研究, 2018 (9):1557-1564.
2020, 
