Preliminary Study on the Evaluation Method of Scientific Research Institutes from the Perspective of Classified Evaluation——Taking the State Key Laboratory in Chemistry as an Example
Guo Jiacheng, Hu Zhigang, Zhang Wandi
Institute of Science of Science and S＆T Management,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China
Abstract：The classified evaluation has the advantages of reasonable application of indicators and convenient comparison of similar individuals,which is the direction of scientific evaluation reform promoted by the China government vigorously.In this paper,the state key laboratories are evaluated as a research case from the perspective of classified evaluation,using the methods of hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scale at the same time.The assessed laboratories are divided into three categories:basic research,applied basic research and applied research.Several indicators are used to evaluate them from different aspects such as scientific output,academic influence and scientific research acceptance.The evaluation results of each type of laboratories are presented,and the scientificity and rationality of the classified evaluation are also confirmed.
郭佳程, 胡志刚, 张琬笛. 基于分类评价视角的科研机构评价方法初探——以化学领域国家重点实验室为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(9): 16-25.
Guo Jiacheng, Hu Zhigang, Zhang Wandi. Preliminary Study on the Evaluation Method of Scientific Research Institutes from the Perspective of Classified Evaluation——Taking the State Key Laboratory in Chemistry as an Example. , 2020(9): 16-25.
[1]张桃林.加快推进科研机构和人员分类评价的思考[J].民主与科学,2017 (2):6-7. [2]中华人民共和国教育部.关于深化高等学校科技评价改革的意见[EB/OL]. (2013-11-29)[2019-09-08].http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2014/content_2620284.htm. [3]肖利.中国国立科研机构分类评价的理论与实践[J].中国科技论坛,2004 (4):88-91. [4]中共中央国务院.关于深化科技体制改革 加快国家创新体系建设的意见[EB/OL]. (2012-09-23)[2019-09-08].http://www.most.gov.cn/kjzc/gjkjzc/gjkjzczh/201308/t20130823_108132.htm. [5]中办国办.关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见[EB/OL]. (2018-07-04)[2019-09-08].http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0704/c1001-30123985.html. [6]The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education[EB/OL]. (2019-02-15)[2019-09-21].http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/. [7]杨忠泰.高校科研分类评价探析[J].中国科技论坛,2011 (12):9-14. [8]黄志广,张淑林.基于 “任务导向”的高校分类评价方法初探[J].中国高教研究,2005 (8):28-30. [9]凌炜.中国高等学校分类评价势在必行[J].中国电子教育,2012 (1):11-15. [10]陈章龙,佘远富.论基于职能发挥的高校分类评价[J].江苏高教,2011 (4):10-12. [11]ORTEGA J L,LÓPEZ-ROMERO E,FERNÁNDEZ I.Multivariate approach to classify research institutes according to their outputs:the case of the CSIC's institutes[J].Journal of informetrics,2011,5 (3):323-332. [12]崔怀将.新建地方本科院校科研分类评价构想[J].管理观察,2017 (13):157-158. [13]周文泳,金为开,柏方云.研究型大学科研效率分类评价[J].科研管理,2018,39 (S1):44-51. [14]王冬梅,王向宁.基于灰色系统的行业特色高校科技分类评价探索[J].科研管理,2019,40 (3):126-132. [15]许日华.高校教师分类评价的理论研究与实践应用——以探讨高校教师工作量分类评价实践为例[J].继续教育研究,2012 (11):83-84. [16]ZHANG H M,LI X.Research performance evaluation of Weihai campus of Harbin institute of technology based on InCites and ESI databases:international workshop on education reform and social sciences[C].Qingdao:Atlantis Press,2018. [17]王仁高,张水玲,张恩盈.高校教师绩效分类评价体系研究——以青岛农业大学为例[J].青岛农业大学学报 (社会科学版),2019,31 (2):57-61. [18]雷文静.应用型高校教师分类评价与教师发展探究[J].高教论坛,2018 (2):113-115. [19]张连和.基于科教融合的新型科研机构人才分类评价研究[J].科学与管理,2018,38 (5):75-78. [20]KRULL W.The max planck experience of evaluation[J].Scientometrics,1995,34 (3):441-450. [21]蒋世银.基于关联数据的科研机构评价指标权重计算方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2016,60 (16):110-115. [22]杨博文,涂平.北京新型研发机构评价指标体系研究[J].科研管理,2018,39 (S1):81-86. [23]关忠诚,许惠,熊慧琴.基于模糊的偏好DEA在科研机构评价中的应用[J].科研管理,2007 (2):9-14. [24]卢小莉,李晶,吴登生.基于期刊编委指数的科研机构学术影响力评价研究:以地质学为例[J].情报学报,2018,37 (1):14-24. [25]王翀,王瑞亭,危怀安.SKL自主创新能力评价指标设置的问卷分析[J].武汉纺织大学学报,2012,25 (6):75-80. [26]中华人民共和国科学技术部.国家重点实验室评估规则[EB/OL].[2019-09-11].http://www.most.gov.cn/mostinfo/xinxifenlei/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2008/201811/P020181128376808439612.pdf. [27]李旭彦,杨晓秋,宋英华.论文数据分析在国家重点实验室学术评价中的应用探讨[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33 (11):122-128. [28]刘彤,郭鲁刚,杨冠灿,等.面向新型科研机构的科研院所创新发展评价指标体系[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31 (4):99-103. [29]GARFIELD E.How to use science citation index (SCI)[J].Current contents,1983 (9):5-14. [30]MA R,HO Y.Comparison of environmental laws publications in science citation index expanded and social science index:a bibliometric analysis[J].Scientometrics,2016,109 (1):227-239. [31]ZHANG N,WAN S,WANG P,et al.A bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers in the field of economics and business based on the essential science indicators database[J].Scientometrics,2018,116 (2):1039-1053. [32]MURTAGH F,LEGENDRE P.Ward's hierarchical agglomerative clustering method:which algorithms implement ward's criterion[J].Journal of classification,2014,31 (3):274-295. [33]储节旺,闫士涛.知识管理学科体系研究 (下)——聚类分析和多维尺度分析[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35 (3):5-9. [34]KRUSKAL J B.Nonmetric multidimensional-scaling:a numerical method[J].Psychometrika,1964,29 (2):115-129. [35]中华人民共和国国务院.国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要 (2006—2020)[EB/OL]. (2006-02-09)[2019-09-08].http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.htm. [36]STOKES E D.Pasteur's quadrant:basic science and technological innovation[M].Washington:Brookings Institution Press,1997. [37]张守华.基于巴斯德象限的中国科研机构技术创新模式研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34 (20):15-19. [38]TIJSSEN R J W.Anatomy of use-inspired researchers:from Pasteur's quadrant to Pasteur's cube model[J].Research policy,2018,47 (9):1626-1638. [39]文剑英.基础研究和应用研究划界的社会学分析[J].自然辩证法研究,2007 (7):79-83.
2020, 
