政府补贴促进还是抑制企业创新持续性——基于异质性创新动机视角

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (9)

全文: PDF (1157 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本文基于倾向得分匹配的生存分析方法,将政府补贴对企业创新的影响从已有研究聚焦的当期效应推进深入到其持续过程,厘清政府补贴与创新持续性之间的关系。研究结果表明:总体上,政府补贴企业比非补贴企业更具有创新持续性,政府补贴加大了企业未来创新的概率,且这一效应在不同产权性质企业中存在显著差别,非国企利用政府补贴提升创新持续性的效果更为显著;从动机角度进一步分组检验发现,政府补贴对企业创新持续性的影响因企业获取政府补贴的不同动机而存在差异。政府补贴对实质性创新企业具有更强的额外激励效应,显著降低了实质性创新企业持续创新的风险率。而策略性创新企业的创新持续性反而要低于非补贴企业,此时政府补贴对企业创新持续性的促进作用不再显著。研究结论为政府补贴实施效果的研究提供了新的证据,在一定程度上拓展了创新持续性理论的相关研究和应用,同时有助于理解中国产业政策影响较强的背景下企业创新持续性问题。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	余芬
	樊霞
	张巧玲

关键词 ：政府补贴, 实质性创新, 策略性创新, 创新持续性

Abstract：Based on propensity score matching and survival analysis, the relationship between government subsidy and innovation persistence is analyzed, and the effect of government subsidy on firm's innovation is expanded from the current period of existing research to its persistent progress.The estimations indicate the supported firms are more persistent than non-supported ones, and government subsidy increase the probability of future innovation.The effect of non-state-owned firms is more significant than that of state-owned firms.From the perspective of innovation motivation, the impact of government subsidy on the firm innovation persistence varies according to the different motives of firms to acquire them.Government subsidy have a stronger additional incentive effect on substantive innovation firms, which significantly reduces the hazard rate of innovation persistence in this kind of firms.The innovation persistence of strategic innovation firms is lower than that of non-supported firms, meanwhile the incentive effect of government subsidy on the innovation persistence is no longer significant.The conclusions provide new evidence for the study of the effect of government subsidy, and expand the research and application of innovation persistence theory to some extent, as well as helping to understand the problem of firm's innovation persistence in the context of the strong influence of Chinese industrial policy.

Key words： Government subsidy Substantive innovation Strategic innovation Innovation persistence

收稿日期: 2020-07-20

PACS:	F273
	F223

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目 “中国企业技术创新持续性诱发机制与政策研究” (71874057),国家社会科学基金重大项目 “数据赋能激励制造业企业创新驱动发展及其对策研究” (18ZDA062)。

通讯作者: 樊霞

作者简介: 余芬 (1993-),女,湖南岳阳人,博士研究生,研究方向为技术创新。

引用本文:

余芬, 樊霞, 张巧玲. 政府补贴促进还是抑制企业创新持续性——基于异质性创新动机视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(5): 67-78.
Yu Fen, Fan Xia, Zhang Qiaoling. Do Government Subsidy Promote or Inhibit Innovation Persistence——Based on the Perspective of Heterogeneity Innovation Motivation. , 2021(5): 67-78.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2021/I5/67

[1] GANTER A,HECKER A.Persistence of innovation:discriminating between types of innovation and sources of state dependence[J].Research policy,2013,42 (8):1431-1445.
[2] KANG T,BAEK C,LEE J D.The persistency and volatility of the firm R&D investment:revisited from the perspective of technological capability[J].Research policy,2017 (46):1570-1579.
[3] 向刚.企业持续创新:理论研究基础、定义、特性和基本类型[J].科学学研究,2005,23 (1):134-138.
[4] MALERBA F,ORSENIGO L,PERETTO P.Persistence of innovative activities,sectorial patterns of innovation and international technological specialization[J].International journal of industrial organization,1997,15 (97):801-826.
[5] 夏保华,陈昌曙.论技术创新的持续性[J].自然辩证法研究,1999 (8):39-42.
[6] CLAUSEN T,POHJOLA M,SAPPRASERT K,et al.Innovation strategies as a source of persistent innovation[J].Working papers on innovation studies,2012,21 (3):553-585.
[7] SUREZ D.Persistence of innovation in unstable environments:continuity and change in the firm's innovative behavior[J].Research policy,2014,43 (4):726-736.
[8] GEROSKI P A,REENEN J V,WALTERS C F.How persistently do firms innovate[J].Research policy,1997,26 (1):33-48.
[9] ANTONELLI C,CRESPI F,SCELLATO G.Inside innovation persistence:new evidence from Italian micro-data[J].Structural change & economic dynamics,2012,23 (4):341-353.
[10] TAVASSOLI S,KARLSSON C.Persistence of various types of innovation analyzed and explained[J].Research policy,2015,44 (10):1887-1901.
[11] 何郁冰,张思.技术创新持续性对企业绩效的影响研究[J].科研管理,2017,38 (9):1-11.
[12] TRIGUERO ,CRCOLES D,CUERVA M C.Measuring the persistence in innovation in Spanish manufacturing firms:empirical evidence using discrete-time duration models[J].Economics of innovation & new technology,2014,23 (5-6):447-468.
[13] 何郁冰,周慧,丁佳敏.技术多元化如何影响企业的持续创新[J].科学学研究,2017 (12):1896-1909.
[14] TAVASSOLI S,KARLSSON C.The role of regional context on innovation persistency of firms[J].Papers in innovation studies,2017,97 (4):931-955.
[15] 鲍宗客,朱魏巍.中国企业的实质性与扭曲性研发——研发企业存在生存溢价吗[J].科学学研究,2017,35 (11):1691-1699.
[16] 杨国超,刘静,廉鹏,等.减税激励、研发操纵与研发绩效[J].经济研究,2017 (8):112-126.
[17] 黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016 (4):60-73.
[18] 毛其淋,许家云.政府补贴对企业新产品创新的影响—基于补贴强度 “适度区间”的视角[J].中国工业经济,2015 (6):94-107.
[19] CHILD J.Context,comparison,and methodology in Chinese management research[J].Management & organization review,2009,5 (1):57-73.
[20] HALL B H.The financing of research and development[J].Oxford review of economic policy,2002,18 (1):35-51.
[21] BROWN J R,MARTINSSON G,PETERSEN B C.Do financing constraints matter for R&D[J].Social science electronic publishing,2012,56 (8):1512-1529.
[22] 梁彤缨,苏德贵,金镇城.政府资助、现金持有与企业研发平滑研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33 (8):86-92.
[23] 李健,杨蓓蓓,潘镇.政府补助、股权集中度与企业创新可持续性[J].中国软科学,2016 (6):180-192.
[24] ARQU-CASTELLS P.Persistence in R&D performance and its implications for the granting of subsidies[J].Review of industrial organization,2013,43 (3):193-220.
[25] HUERGO E,TRENADO M,UBIERNA A.The impact of public support on firm propensity to engage in R&D:Spanish experience[J].Technological forecasting & social change,2016 (113):206-219.
[26] 尚洪涛,黄晓硕.政府补贴、研发投入与创新绩效的动态交互效应[J].科学学研究,2018,36 (3):446-455+501.
[27] 安同良,周绍东,皮建才.补贴对中国企业自主创新的激励效应[J].经济研究,2009,44 (10):87-98+120.
[28] 许家云,毛其淋.政府补贴、治理环境与中国企业生存[J].世界经济,2016 (2):75-99.
[29] LOECKER J D.Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia[J].Journal of international economics,2007,73 (1):69-98.
[30] 邵敏,包群.地方政府补贴企业行为分析:扶持强者还是保护弱者[J].世界经济文汇,2011 (1):56-72.
[31] 蒋灵多,陆毅.市场竞争加剧是否助推国有企业加杠杆[J].中国工业经济,2018 (11):155-173.
[32] 聂辉华,江艇,杨汝岱.中国工业企业数据库的使用现状和潜在问题[J].世界经济,2012 (5):142-158.
[33] 肖利平,许巍峰.工业企业数据库在企业经济行为研究中的应用——视角、合并与拓展[J].外国经济与管理,2018,40 (3):137-152.
[34] BRANDT L,BIESEBROECK J V,ZHANG Y.Creative accounting or creative destruction? firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing[J].Journal of development economics,2012,97 (2):339-351.
[35] 王刚刚,谢富纪,贾友.R&D补贴政策激励机制的重新审视——基于外部融资激励机制的考察[J].中国工业经济,2017 (2):60-78.
[36] 鞠晓生,卢荻,虞义华.融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J].经济研究,2013,48 (1):4-16.
[37] POHJOLA M,CLAUSEN T H.Persistence of product innovation:comparing breakthrough and incremental product innovation[J].Technology analysis & strategic management,2013,25 (4):369-385.
[38] MEZ J A,ROCHINA-BARRACHINA M E,SANCHIS A,et al.The determinants of R&D persistence in SMEs[J].Small business economics,2015,44 (3):505-528.
[39] EGGERTSSON G B ,KRUGMAN P.Debt,deleveraging,and the liquidity trap:a Fisher-Minsky-Koo approach[J].Quarterly journal of economics,2012,127 (3):1469-1513.
[40] HUANG C H,YANG C H.Persistence of innovation in Taiwan's manufacturing firms[J].經濟論文叢刊,2010,38 (2):199-231.
[41] 安同良,施浩,LUDOVICO A.中国制造业企业R&D行为模式的观测与实证——基于江苏省制造业企业问卷调查的实证分析[J].经济研究,2006 (2):21-30+56.
[42] WZIATEK-KUBIAK A,PECZKOWSKI M,BALCEROWICZ E.Occasional and persistent innovators in Poland:an empirical study of obstacles to innovation and their complementarities[J].Economic studies,2011,4 (35):345-380.
[43] ROGERS M.Networks,firm size and innovation[J].Small business economics,2004,22 (2):141-153.