Abstract：Ethics evaluation is an indispensable key part in the operation of the patent system,and an important mechanism for “Science and Technology inclined to Goodness”in patent system.The principle of public order and good custom and the ethical exception rule provide the necessary legal basis for the orderly development of patent ethical evaluation.The ethical evaluation in patent authorization and patent confirmation forms the beforehand and afterwards ethical evaluation of technical achievements respectively.However,the viewpoint “ethical minimization”in practice often results in the absence of patent ethical evaluation.With the emergence of new technologies that are full of ethical disputes,the practical appeal of enhancing patent ethical evaluation is becoming stronger and stronger.Therefore,it is necessary to improve the evaluation mechanism of patent ethics to realize the value orientation of “Science and Technology inclined to Goodness”in the practice of patent system operation by typed content interpretation and specialized procedure design according to the formation mechanism of the dilemma of patent ethics evaluation mechanism.
刘鑫. “科技向善”倡议下专利伦理评价机制研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(6): 46-53.
Liu Xin. Research on Patent Ethics Evaluation Mechanism Under the Initiative of “Science and Technology Inclined to Goodness”. , 2021(6): 46-53.
[1]司晓.科技向善应成为数字社会的共同准则[N].学习时报,2019-06-12 (006). [2]CORNISH Willian,LLEWELYN David.Intellectual property:patents,copyrights,trade marks and allied rights[M].London:Sweet & Maxwell,2010:144-145. [3]陈爱华.科学伦理的哲学审思——基于认识论维度的追问[M]// 单继刚,甘绍平.应用伦理:经济、科技与文化.北京:人民出版社,2008:107. [4]HERDEGEN Matthias.Patents on parts of the human body salient issues under EC and WTO law[J].The journal of world intellectual property,2002,5 (2):151-153. [5]毛新志.基因专利的伦理审视[J].自然辩证法通讯,2008 (1):22-26. [6]ELIZABETH N G.Immoral inventions-interaction between ethics and biotechnology patent law[J].Singapore academy of law journal,2010,22 (S1):931-947. [7]胡开忠.高科技发展与专利保护的创新[J].科技与法律,2004 (3):8-13. [8]NOVECK Beth.Peer to patent:collective intelligence,open review,and patent reform[J].Harvard journal of law & technology,2006,20 (1):124. [9]BURK Dan,LEMLEY Mark.Tailoring patents to different industries[M]//EMANUELA Arezzo,GUSTAVO Ghidini.Biotechnology and software patent law.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,2011:10-12. [10]胡波.专利法的伦理基础——以生物技术专利问题为例证[J].法制与社会发展,2008 (2):109-111. [11]王泽鉴.民法总则[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009:277. [12]付丽霞.美国专利客体制度发展历程的回顾与疏解[J].中国发明与专利,2019 (1):20-25. [13]BERDICHEVSKY Daniel,NEUENSCHWANDER Erik.Toward an ethics of persuasive technology[J].Communications of the ACM,1999,42 (5):51-58. [14]肇旭.生物技术专利授权要件研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:10-11. [15]FRASER Erica.Computers as inventors-legal and policy implications of artificial intelligence on patent law[J].A journal of law,technology and society,2016,13 (3):305-332. [16]SCOLA Adriane.Uncommon genes,unpatentable subject matter[J].Seattle university law review,2011,34 (3):909-934. [17]刘鑫.人工智能生成技术方案的专利法规制——理论争议、实践难题与法律对策[J].法律科学 (西北政法大学学报),2019 (5):82-92. [18]王一奇.理由與提供理由的事實[M]// 谢世民.理由轉向:規範性之哲學研究.台北:國立台灣大學出版中心,2015:105-140. [19]曾陈明汝.两岸暨欧美专利法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:71. [20]李岩.公序良俗原则的司法乱象与本相——兼论公序良俗原则适用的类型化[J].法学,2015 (11):54. [21]哈特.法律的概念[M].张文显,译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996:181. [22]崔国斌.专利法:原理与案例:第2版[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2016:56-57. [23]于飞.公序良俗原则与诚实信用原则的区分[J].中国社会科学,2015 (11):154. [24]李双元,杨德群.论公序良俗原则的司法适用[J].法商研究,2014 (3):65. [25]尼采.论道德的谱系[M].赵千帆,译.北京:商务印书馆,2018:54-55. [26]戴孟勇.论公序良俗的判断标准[J].法制与社会发展,2006 (3):53. [27]张金钟.生物医药研究伦理审查的体制机制建设[J].医学与哲学 (A),2013 (5):17-21. [28]菲利普斯.是天使还是魔鬼？专利与知识产权制度[M]// 竹中俊子.专利法律与理论——当代研究指南.彭哲,沈暘,译.北京:知识产权出版社,2013:140-147.
2021, 
