Complex Policy Causal Mechanism and Holistic Governance of Intellectual Property Right Incentive for Scientific Researchers
Liu Xin1,2, Yang Xi3
1. School of Public Administration,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China; 2. Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China; 3. Intellectual Property Research Center, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China
Abstract：It is an important measure in the system and mechanism reform of scientific researchers to realize the innovation incentive of scientific and technological achievements through the ownership allocation of intellectual property rights of scientific and technological achievements,which involves policy exploration and institutional innovation,but the policy causal mechanism is still unclear.This study combines the policy process of Intellectual Property Right Incentive of scientific researchers and the governance fragmentation dilemma it produces,and puts forward the definition and connotation of Complex Policy System from the perspective of holistic governance theory.On this basis,the framework of complex policy causal mechanism of property right incentive for researchers is constructed,and the process tracing method is introduced to refine the complex policy causal mechanism in the reform case.It is found that the interest balance among governance subjects and the governance fragmentation of complex policy system constitute the causal mechanism chain that affects the final result of Intellectual Property Right Incentive for researchers.Finally,this paper proposes a holistic governance strategy to solve the above fragmentation problems.
刘鑫, 杨曦. 科研人员知识产权激励的复杂政策因果机制及其整体性治理[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(9): 143-152.
Liu Xin, Yang Xi. Complex Policy Causal Mechanism and Holistic Governance of Intellectual Property Right Incentive for Scientific Researchers. , 2021(9): 143-152.
[1]COASE R H.The problem of social cost[J].Journal of law and economics,1960,3 (1):1-44. [2]程恩富,胡乐明.新制度经济学[M].北京:经济日报出版社,2005:49-55. [3]贺德方.对科技成果及科技成果转化若干基本概念的辨析与思考[J].中国软科学,2011 (11):1-7. [4]朱雪忠,乔永忠.国家资助发明专利权归属研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2009. [5]MOWERY D C,NELSON R R,SAMPATET B N,et al.The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S.universities:an assessment of the effects of the bayh-dole act of 1980[J].Research policy,2001,30 (1):99-119. [6]宋河发,吴博,吕磊.促进科技成果转化知识产权实施权制度研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34 (9):1319-1325. [7]常旭华.精细化管理视角下高校专利转移管理问题与国别借鉴研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017 (5):29-38. [8]LISSONI F,LOTZ P,SCHOVSBO J,et al.Academic patenting and the professor's privilege:evidence on Denmark from the KEINS database[J].Science & public policy,2009,36 (8):595-607. [9]康凯宁.职务科技成果混合所有制探析[J].中国高校科技,2015 (8):71-74. [10]刘鑫,穆荣平.基层首创与央地互动:基于四川省职务科技成果权属政策试点的研究[J].中国行政管理,2020 (11):83-91. [11]刘鑫,李婷婷,陈光.职务发明权属 “混合所有制”政策试点起作用了吗[J].科学学研究,2020,38 (7):1197-1206. [12]唐良智.下放处置权,扩大收益权,探索所有权—创新高校职务科技成果管理制度的思考与实践[J].求是,2014 (4):53-54. [13]陈振明.政策科学的 “研究纲领”[J].中国社会科学,1997 (4):48-61. [14]贺德方,唐玉立,周华东.科技创新政策体系构建及实践[J].科学学研究,2019,37 (1):3-10,44. [15]COMFORT L K,LYNN L E.Taking complexity seriously:policy analysis,triangulation,and sustainable development[J].Journal of policy analysis and management,1999,18 (1):181-184. [16]ANDREW D.Holistic governance[J].Public policy and administration,1990,5 (1):4-19. [17]PERRI S,LEAT D,SELTZER K,et al.Towards holistic governance the new reform agenda[M].New York:Palgrave,2002. [18]LING T.Delivering joined-up government in the UK:dimensions,issues and problems[J].Public administration,2002,80 (4):615-642. [19]GAO X,SONG Y,ZHU X.Integration and coordination:advancing China's fragmented e-government to holistic governance[J].Government information quarterly,2013,30 (2):173-181. [20]郭雪松,朱正威.跨域危机整体性治理中的组织协调问题研究—基于组织间网络视角[J].公共管理学报,2011,8 (4):50-60. [21]赵新峰,袁宗威,马金易.京津冀大气污染治理政策协调模式绩效评析及未来图式探究[J].中国行政管理,2019 (3):80-87. [22]丁建彪.整体性治理视角下中国农村扶贫脱贫实践过程研究[J].政治学研究,2020 (3):113-124+128. [23]COASE R H.The problem of social cost[M]//GOPALAKRISHNAN C.Classic papers in natural resource economics.London:Palgrave Macmillan,1960. [24]文魁,吴冬梅.异质人才的异常激励—北京市高科技企业人才激励机制调研报告[J].管理世界,2003 (10):110-114. [25]刘颖.构建多元化创新科技人才评价体系[J].中国行政管理,2019 (5):92-97. [26]李婷婷,刘鑫,陈光.高校科技成果 “反公地悲剧”问题的突破机制—以职务发明权属改革为视角的分析[J].中国高校科技,2020 (7):89-93. [27]谢地.试析高校国有科技成果转化的产权配置问题[J].电子知识产权,2018 (9):51-66. [28]宋河发,李振兴.影响制约科技成果转化和知识产权运用的问题分析与对策研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2014 (5):548-557. [29]GlENNAN S.Mechanisms and the nature of causation[J].Erkenntnis,1996,44 (1):49-71. [30]DAN S.Case study research:principles and practices by John Gerring[J].Perspectives on politics,2007,6 (2):402-403. [31]BEACH D,PEDERSEN R B.Process-tracing methods:foundations and guidelines[M].Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,2013. [32]HALL P A.Policy paradigms,social learning,and the state[J].Comparative politics,1993,25 (3):275-275. [33]TOUWEN L J.How does a coordinated market economy evolve? Effects of policy learning in the Netherlands in the 1980s[J].Labor history,2008,49 (4):439-464.
2021, 
