Evaluation on the Creational and Original Capacity of Innovation in Beijing,Shanghai and Shenzhen:Insights from the State Science and Technology “Three Awards”
Lu Chao, Li Wenli
School of Management,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China
Abstract：It is difficult to evaluate the creational and original capacity of innovation for the indicator and data issue,while the State Science and Technology “Three Awards” (The State Natural Science Award,The State Technological Invention Award,The State Scientific and Technological Progress Award)brings the possibility by being an ideal quantifiable indicator.Based on the connotation of the creational and original capacity of innovation,this paper firstly divided it into three sub-capacity as scientifical innovation,technological innovation,and industrial innovation.Furthermore,by taking into the corresponding relationships between the State Science and Technology “Three Awards”and the three sub-capacities of the creational and original innovation,an evaluation index system was constructed.This was followed by an evaluation and comparision of the creational and original capacity of innovation among Beijing,Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2018,through the improved vertical and horizontal pull-off grade methodology.The research findings are as follows.Beijing has the higher comprehensive and three sub-capacities when comparing with Shanghai and Shenzhen,especially its creational and original capacity of technological innovation is particularly prominent.Shanghai is most likely to making breakthroughs in the creational and original capacity of scientifical innovation.Shenzhen has a significantly higher growth rate in the creational and original capacity of industrial innovation than that of Beijing and Shanghai.This paper not only enriches the evaluation index system and methodology of the creational and original capacity of innovation,but also provides relevant suggestions for the creational and original innovation capacity construction in Beijing,Shanghai and Shenzhen.
卢超, 李文丽. 京沪深创新策源能力评价研究:基于国家科学技术 “三大奖”的视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(2): 151-161.
Lu Chao, Li Wenli. Evaluation on the Creational and Original Capacity of Innovation in Beijing,Shanghai and Shenzhen:Insights from the State Science and Technology “Three Awards”. , 2022(2): 151-161.
[1]朱梦菲,陈守明,邵悦心.基于AHP-TOPSIS和SOM聚类的区域创新策源能力评价[J].科研管理,2020,41 (2):40-50. [2]庄珺.增强创新策源能力,上海如何 “对标顶级”[N].文汇报,2018-07-02 (1). [3]陈超.如何理解创新策源能力[J].竞争情报,2018,14 (4):3. [4]李万.增强科技创新策源能力的战略选择[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (8):1-3. [5]任声策.以 “源”促 “策”,全面增强创新策源能力[N].科技日报,2020-03-24 (5). [6]申言.增强创新策源能力[N].解放日报,2018-07-06 (1). [7]张金福,刘雪.我国地方创新策源能力的模糊综合评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2021,41 (9):8-14. [8]敦帅,陈强,马永智.创新策源能力评价研究:指标构建、区域比较与提升举措[J].科学管理研究,2021,39 (1):83-89. [9]陈搏.深圳建设全球科学中心的战略评价[J].科研管理,2017,38 (S1):216-222. [10]GARNETT R.The impact of science centers/museums on their surrounding communities:summary report[EB/OL]. (2018-8-10)[2021-1-18].https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ccfd0ff2-d340-360e-91ae-938618aa0ef1/. [11]FALK J H,NEEDHAM M D.Measuring the impact of a science center on its community[J].Journal of research in science teaching,2011,48 (1):1-12. [12]李强,余吉安.世界主要科学中心和创新高地比较与借鉴研究[J].科学管理研究,2016,34 (6):113-116. [13]孙玉涛,国容毓.世界科学活动中心转移与科学家跨国迁移——以诺贝尔物理学奖获得者为例[J].科学学研究,2018,36 (7):1161-1169. [14]高辉,韩晓明,张志强,等.基于TOPSIS法的军工科研单位创新能力的综合评价[J].现代电子技术,2006 (24):123-124. [15]谭春辉.我国普通高校科技创新社会影响力的测度:基于2000—2007年国家科技奖励三大奖项的统计分析[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27 (5):122-126. [16]蒋展鸿,朱桂龙,曹浩生.行业因素如何影响产学研合作倾向:基于国家科技进步奖的数据分析[J].中国科技论坛,2014 (2):104-110. [17]李强.基于获奖者年龄的国家科技奖激励效用分析[J].科研管理,2016,37 (6):37-44. [18]张浩,霍国庆,汪明月,等.科技成果转化的战略绩效评价——基于国家科学技术进步奖成果的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41 (8):7-25. [19]杜丹丽,曾小春.速度特征视角的我国高新技术企业创新能力动态综合评价研究[J].科研管理,2017,38 (7):44-53. [20]李美娟,袁宁,徐林明.基于正交投影法的动态评价方法[J].中国管理科学,2020,28 (12):208-219. [21]CHIU S H,LIN T Y.Evaluation of regional knowledge innovation system in China:an economic framework based on dynamic slacks-based approach[J].Journal of Asian finance economics and business,2019,6 (3):141-149. [22]LIN S F,SUN J,WANG S Y.Dynamic evaluation of the technological innovation efficiency of Chian's industrial enterprises[J].Science and public policy,2019,46 (2):232-243. [23]吴飞美,李美娟,徐林明,等.基于理想解和灰关联度的动态评价方法及其应用研究[J].中国管理科学,2019,27 (12):136-142. [24]YANG F,GUO G S.Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of innovation capability of Chinese national high-tech zone based on entropy weight-taking the northern coastal comprehensive economic zone as an example[J].Journal of intelligent and fuzzy system,2020,38 (6):7857-7864. [25]GUO J H.Evaluation and spatial characteristics analysis of Chinese port economy innovation impetus[J].Journal of coastal research,2020,104 (SI):601-604. [26]郭亚军.综合评价理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2002. [27]陈国宏,李美娟.基于总体离差平方和最大的区域自主创新能力动态评价研究[J].研究与发展管理,2014,26 (5):43-53. [28]欧忠辉,朱祖平.区域自主创新效率动态研究:基于总体离差平方和最大的动态评价方法[J].中国管理科学,2014,22 (S1):782-787. [29]RIDDEL M,SCHWER R K.Regional innovative capacity with endogenous employment:empirical evidence from the US[J].Review of regional studies,2003,33 (1):73-84. [30]王婉娟,危怀安.协同创新能力评价指标体系构建:基于国家重点实验室的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34 (3):471-480. [31]FURMAN J L,PORTER M E,STERN S.The determinants of national innovative capacity[J].Research policy,2002,31 (6):899-933. [32]范德成,杜明月.高端装备制造业技术创新资源配置效率及影响因素研究:基于两阶段StoNED和Tobit模型的实证分析[J].中国管理科学,2018,26 (1):13-24. [33]易明,彭甲超,张尧.中国高等教育投入产出效率的综合评价:基于Window-Malmquist指数法[J].中国管理科学,2019,27 (12):32-42. [34]CHANG S,FAN C.Scientific or technological driving force?Constructing a system of national innovative capacity[J].International journal of innovation science,2017,2 (9):170-183. [35]魏洁云,江可申,李雪冬.中国高技术产业创新投入与产出的关联测度分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2014,31 (1):77-92. [36]李培楠,赵兰香,万劲波.创新要素对产业创新绩效的影响——基于中国制造业和高技术产业数据的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2014,32 (4):604-612. [37]李玲玉,郭亚军,易平涛.无量纲化方法的选取原则[J].系统管理学报,2016,25 (6):1040-1045. [38]易平涛,周义,郭亚军,等.一种体现发展趋势的动态综合评价方法[J].运筹与管理,2016,25 (6):175-180. [39]李旭辉,夏万军.基于五大发展理念的人才发展环境动态评价实证研究——以国家自主创新示范区为例[J].北京理工大学学报 (社会科学版),2020,22 (2):60-69.
2022, 
