Research on Multiple Conjunctural Causation of R&D Investment of High-Tech Enterprises——Based on fsQCA Method
Cai Youhua1, Cao Yunjing1, Chen Guohong1,2, Liang Juan3
1. School of Economics and Management,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China; 2. School of Management,Fujian University of Technology,Fuzhou 350118,China; 3. School of Business Management,Fujian Jiangxia University,Fuzhou 350108,China
Abstract：R&D investment is the foundation for enterprises to maintain sustainable development capacity in the increasingly intensified market competition.However,innovation input has the characteristics of high risk,high cost and high complexity,and enterprises' innovation decisions are affected by the combination of multiple conditional variables.Based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis,this study explores the multiple conjunctural causation of six factors at microscopic layer,middlescopic layer and macroscopic layer on R&D investment of high-tech enterprises.This research found five different paths which are helpful to promote enterprises to invest in high innovation.These five paths can be classified into three types named as innovation fund driven,environment driven and multi-resource driven.Considering the influence of multiple factors on R&D investment,it not only helps to fully grasp the influence mechanism of R&D investment of high-tech enterprises,but also answers whether there are complementary or substitutive effects of different factors on R&D investment.The conclusions provide paths and inspiration for effectively stimulating enterprises' innovation.
蔡猷花, 曹芸菁, 陈国宏, 梁娟. 高新技术企业研发投入的多重并发因果关系——基于模糊集定性比较分析的研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(2): 86-94.
Cai Youhua, Cao Yunjing, Chen Guohong, Liang Juan. Research on Multiple Conjunctural Causation of R&D Investment of High-Tech Enterprises——Based on fsQCA Method. , 2022(2): 86-94.
[1]孙晓华,郭旭,王昀.政府补贴、所有权性质与企业研发决策[J].管理科学学报,2017 (6):22-35. [2]KUO H C,WANG L H,YEH L J.The role of education of directors in influencing firm R&D investment[J].Asia Pacific management review 2018,23 (2):108-120. [3]程华,张志英.政府补贴对纺织企业研发投入的影响[J].研究与发展管理,2020,32 (1):38-49. [4]贾慧英,王宗军,曹祖毅.研发投入跳跃与组织绩效:环境动态性和吸收能力的调节效应[J].南开管理评论,2018,120 (3):132-143. [5]王菁.期望绩效反馈、政企关系与公司研发投资关系研究[J].经济与管理,2019,33 (1):63-68. [6]谢宗杰.知识异质性特征、研发投资策略与创新联盟稳定性[J].外国经济与管理,2015,37 (8):65-77. [7]郭元源,贺易宁,邓晓慧.基于QCA方法的创新资源诅咒治理模式研究[J].科研管理,2019,40 (4):83-91. [8]RAGIN C C.Redisigning social inquiry:fuzzy sets and beyond[J].Social forces,2010,88 (4):275-290. [9]刘志迎,沈磊,韦周雪.企业开放式创新动力源的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2018,36 (4):732-744. [10]岳圣元,张瀚予,唐家龙.财务结构对研发投入的影响机制——来自生物医药上市企业的证据[J].理论与现代化,2019 (06):103-113. [11]吴建祖,曾宪聚,赵迎.高层管理团队注意力与企业创新战略——两职合一和组织冗余的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37 (5):170-180. [12]THOMAS A B.Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance[J].Administrative science quarterly,1988,33 (3):388-400. [13]梅胜军,何艺娟,徐家瑾,等.高管注意力配置对企业创新和财务绩效的影响机制研究[J].经营与管理,2018 (2):59-64. [14]CAMPELLO M,GIAMBONA E,GRAHAM J R,et al.Liquidity management and corporate investment during a financial crisis[J].Review of financial studies,2011,24 (6):1944-1979. [15]HAUNSCHILD P R,BECKMAN C M.When do interlocks matter?Alternate sources of information and interlock influence[J].Administrative science quarterly,1998,43 (4):815-844. [16]邵强,耿红悦.基于社会网络分析的石油企业协同创新网络研究——以BE石油企业为例[J].科技管理研究,2017,37 (7):136-143. [17]GELETKAYCZ M A,HAMBRICK D C.The external ties of top executives:implications for strategic choice and performance[J].Administrative science quarterly,1997,42 (4):654-681. [18]韩洁,田高良,李留闯.连锁董事与社会责任报告披露:基于组织间模仿视角管理科学[J].管理科学,2015,28 (1):18-31. [19]ROSANNA G,ROGER C.A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology:a literature review[J].The journal of product innovation management,2002,19 (2):110-132. [20]钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型[J].管理世界,2010 (5):118-129. [21]严若森,华小丽,钱晶晶.组织冗余及产权性质调节作用下连锁董事网络对企业研发投入的影响研究[J].管理学报,2018,15 (2):217-229. [22]TORTORIELLO M.The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity:the moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge[J].Strategic management journal,2015,36 (4):586-597. [23]UZZI B.Social structure and competition in Inter firm networks:the paradox of embeddedness[J].Administrative science quarterly,1997,42 (3):35-67. [24]PERE A C.Persistence in R&D performance and its Implications for the granting of subsidies[J].Review of industrial organization,2013,43 (3):193-220. [25]BOEING P.The allocation and effectiveness of China's R&D subsidies-evidence from listed firms[J].Research policy,2016,45 (9):1774-1789. [26]PORTER M E.Competitive advantage[M].New York:The Free Press,1985. [27]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017 (6):155-167. [28]陶秋燕,李锐,王永贵.创新网络特征要素配置、环境动荡性与创新绩效关系研究——来自QCA的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33 (18):19-27. [29]严若森,钱晶晶.董事会资本、CEO股权激励与企业R&D投入:基于中国A股高科技电子行业上市公司的经验证据[J].经济管理,2016.38 (7):60-70. [30]姜付秀,王运通,田园,等.多个大股东与企业融资约束:基于文本分析的经验证据[J].管理世界,2017 (12):61-74. [31]林乐,谢德仁.分析师荐股更新利用管理层语调吗:基于业绩说明会的文本分析[J].管理世界,2017 (11):125-45. [32]周亦鹏.软件人主题分析和信息检索技术[M].北京:北京邮电大学出版社,2012. [33]熊和平,杨伊君,周靓.政府补助对不同生命周期企业R&D的影响[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37 (9):3-15. [34]解维敏,魏化倩.市场竞争、组织冗余与企业研发投入[J].中国软科学,2016 (8):102-111. [35]RIHOUX B.Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)and related systematic comparative methods——recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research[J].International sociology,2006,21 (5):679-706. [36]张明,陈伟宏,蓝海林.中国企业 “凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业:基于94个案例的模糊集定性比较分析 (fsQCA)[J].中国工业经济,2019 (4):117-135. [37]郭玥.政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J].中国工业经济,2018 (9):98-116. [38]伍虹儒.政府R&D 支持、企业创新资金对其创新效率影响的实证研究[J].技术与创新管理,2020,41 (2):119-126.
2022, 
