Abstract：After the transformation from administrative dependence mode to functional autonomy mode,the operation mode of Chinese science and technology associations presents the typical characteristics of between dependence and autonomy.In order to explore the formation mechanism of this feature,relying on the theory of new institutionalism and through the typical case of M society,it can be found that:Firstly,the development process of the organization(accumulated core resources,established interest structure),the rational choice of relevant personnel(the choice of policy makers,organization leaders and employees)and the external legitimacy of the organization affect the change process of the operation mode of science and technology associations;Secondly,the influence of the three factors is two-way,both the positive driving force to push it towards functional autonomy and the reverse pulling force to pull it back to the state of administrative dependence.The force of confrontation determines that science and technology associations are far away from the administrative dependence mode and can not achieve the state of functional autonomy.Based on this conclusion,we can sort out three effective ways to shape the autonomy of science and technology associations.There are resource expansion to deal with resource hollowing out,concept of advocacy to enhance the dynamics of change and shaping the environment to build organizational legitimacy.
许文文. 中国科技社团运作模式变迁的影响因素及作用机制——以M学会为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(7): 147-156.
Xu Wenwen. Influential Factors and Mechanism of the Change of the Operation Mode of Chinese Science and Technology Associations ——Take M Society as an Example. , 2022(7): 147-156.
[1]王春法.关于科技社团在国家创新体系中地位和作用的几点思考[J].科学学研究,2012(10):7-10. [2]陈姗姗,张向前.中国特色科技类社会组织发展战略研究[J].中国科技论坛,2018(7):1-8. [3]杨文志.学会改革的目标和路径选择[J].科协论坛,2003(5):10-16. [4]CORNFORTH C.What makes boards effective? An examination of the relationships between board inputs,structures,processes and effectiveness in non-profit organizations[J].Corporate governance an international review,2010,9(3):217-227. [5]ZHANG L,TANG A.Leader identity,resource acquisition and capacity building:an empirical study based on science and technology society in Shanghai[J].Journal of east china university of science and technology,2017,32(2):63-71. [6]SCHNURBEIN G V.Patterns of governance structures in trade associations and unions[J].Nonprofit management and leadership,2009,20(1):97-115. [7]FRIEDMAN A,PHILLIPS M.Balancing strategy and accountability:a model for the governance of professional associations[J].Nonprofit management and leadership,2010,15(2):187-204. [8]BRYCE H J.Nonprofits as social capital and agents in the public policy process:toward a new paradigm[J].Nonprofit management & leadership,2006,35(2):311-318. [9]QIANG X.Research of the science and technology society knowledge innovation process mechanism[J].China science and technology information,2010(18):309-311. [10]GOLDMAN L.Science,reform,and politics in Victorian Britain:the social science association and the making of social policy[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University press,2022. [11]孟凡蓉,陈光,袁梦,等.世界一流科技社团综合能力评估指标体系设计研究[J].科学学研究,2020(11):20-26. [12]鲁云鹏.科学社会学理论视角下科技社团治理有效性评价与检验[J].科技进步与对策,2020(12):125-133. [13]吴迪,邓国胜.基于使命和宗旨视角的科技社团能力要素模型构建[J].中国非营利评论,2018(2):170-184. [14]鲁云鹏.基于治理转型背景下社会资本对科技社团治理有效性的影响研究[J].中国科技论坛2021(4):11. [15]杨红梅.科技社团核心竞争力的认识模型及实现初探[J].科学学研究,2020(5):654-659. [16]潘建红,卢佩玲.多元治理与科技社团公信力提升[J].科学管理研究,2018(4):4. [17]游玎怡,李芝兰,王海燕.政府转移职能和购买服务提升了社会组织的服务质量吗?——以中国科技社团为例[J].中国行政管理,2020(7):56-68. [18]陈建国.政社关系与科技社团承接职能转移的差异——基于调查问卷的实证分析[J].中国行政管理,2015(5):38-43. [19]潘惠彬,梁根乐.社团“挂靠体制”的弊端分析[J].学会,2006(6):42-44. [20]黄浩明,石忠诚,杨洪萍,等.中外学会管理体制的比较研究[J],学会,2007(8):20-28. [21]陈子韬,孟凡蓉,袁梦,等.科技人力资源、科技社团与科技创新绩效——基于中国内地省级面板的实证分析[J],科技导报,2021(10):132-140. [22]徐顽强,朱喆.市场化环境下科技社团生存状况及对策建议研究———以武汉市为例[J].科技管理研究,2015(18):59-65. [23]王孜丹,张理茜.学会挂靠体制的变革与未来[J].学会,2017(12):23-27. [24]冯建,冯异香,马立涛.科技社团脱离挂靠的思考[J].学会,2019(5):45-48. [25]张庆霞,张举国,董志峰,等.科协学会会员主体地位实现的制约因素及路径设计[J].科技信息,2013(15):16-17. [26]罗梓超,李荣,刘如,等.韩国科技社团发展模式与启示——以优化管理体系为视角的分析[J].中国高校科技,2021(9):57-61. [27]许鹿,李云.社会组织在政治关联中的自主性产生何以可能？——评《跨部门协同中非盈利组织自主性的生成机制》[J].公共管理学报,2013(10):12-14. [28]LU Yiyi.Non-governmental organizations in China:the rise of dependent autonomy[M].New York:Routledge,2009. [29]王诗宗,宋程成.独立抑或自主:中国社会组织特征重思[J],中国社会科学,2013(5):50-56. [30]HALL P,TAYLOR R.Political science and the three institutional studies[J].Politics & government week,1999(12):936-950. [31]河连燮.制度分析:理论与争议:第2版[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014. [32]MARCH J G,OLSEN J P.Rediscovering institutions:the organizational basis of politics[M].New York:The Free.2017. [33]彼得·豪尔,罗斯玛丽·泰勒,何俊智.政治科学与三个新制度主义[J].何俊智,译.经济社会体制比较,2003(5):20-29. [34]黄新华.政治科学中的新制度主义——当代西方新制度主义政治学述评[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(3):28-35.
2022, 
