Abstract：Building an element-complete and operation-efficient innovative development model of advanced materials applicable to national conditions is a pivotal prerequisite for orderly development of intelligent manufacturing.Based on the theory of technological innovation system and science-technology-bussiness,this study constructs a framework from four dimensions of actors,focus areas,exertion-points of innovation chain and innovative measures to analyze innovative development model of advanced materials for intelligent manufacturing in the US and Japan.Then it argues the similarities and differences with causes analysis of the two models.The research indicates that the US adopts the government-guiding,two-wheel-driving and multi-agent-collaborating model,and Japan adopts the government-leading,enterprise-promoting and scientific research institution-supporting model.Both models appear the characteristics of serving national strategies,strengthening top-level design,focusing on knowledge management,and establishing innovative ecology.However,there are differences in aspects of role positioning,focus areas,exertion-points of innovation chain and innovative measures,mainly due to the different historical culture,international status and resource endowment between two countries.Finally,drawing on the practices of the US and Japan combined with China's situation,this paper proposes the implications to optimize the innovative development model of advanced materials for intelligent manufacturing in China.
李双美, 王昶, 耿红军. 美日智能制造关键新材料创新突破模式及其启示[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(7): 178-188.
Li Shuangmei, Wang Chang, Geng Hongjun. Innovative Development Model and Implications of Advanced Materials for Intelligent Manufacturing in the US and Japan. , 2022(7): 178-188.
[1]王昶,宋慧玲,耿红军,等.关键新材料创新突破的研究回顾与展望[J].资源科学,2019,41(2):207-218. [2]马琳,商龚平.“中国制造2025”对材料提出新要求[J].新材料产业,2015(7):11-13. [3]雷小苗,李正风.国家创新体系结构比较:理论与实践双维视角[J/OL].科技进步与对策:1-7[2021-11-03].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20210603.1502.008.html. [4]冯敏红.基于美国科研创新曼哈顿模式与硅谷模式经验研究[J].科学管理研究,2017,35(2):113-116. [5]费艳颖,凌莉.美国国家创新生态系统构建特征及对我国的启示[J].科学管理研究,2019,37(2):161-165. [6]蓝晓霞.美国产学研协同创新的主要模式、特点及启示[J].中国高教研究,2014(4):50-53. [7]许泉,吴强,刘欣.美国产学研协同创新的主要模式及特点[J].中国高等教育,2014(20):61-63. [8]王溯,任真,胡智慧.科技发展战略视角下的日本国家创新体系[J].中国科技论坛,2021(4):180-188. [9]张晋.日本科技创新模式的发展及借鉴[J].中国高校科技,2018(7):38-40. [10]罗雪英,蔡雪雄.日本国家创新体系的构建与启示——基于科技-产业-经济互动关系的分析[J].现代日本经济,2021,40(1):72-82. [11]HEKKERT M P,SUURS R A A,NEGRO S O,et al.Functions of innovation systems:a new approach for analysing technological change[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2007,74(4):413-432. [12]BERGEK A,JACOBSSON S,CARLSSON B,et al.Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems:a scheme of analysis[J].Research policy,2008,37(3):407-429. [13]XUG N,WU Y C,MINSHALL T,et al.Exploring innovation ecosystems across science,technology,and business:a case of 3D printing in China[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2018(136):208-221. [14]U.S.Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.Energy materials network[EB/OL].[2019-10-02].https://www.energy.gov/eere/energy-materials-network/energy-materials-network. [15]宋孝先,王茜,曲雅婷,等.美国科学研究经费“来源-执行”部门多元化及中国启示[J].中国软科学,2019(8):166-174. [16]周海源.国家创新体系立法的美国实践及其启示[J].中国软科学,2019(3):13-19. [17]刘学之,马婧,彭洁,等.美国国家实验室成果转化路径解析与制度保障[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(11):20-25. [18]National Institute of Standards and Technology.Material measurement laboratory[EB/OL].[2019-11-28].https://www.nist.gov/mml. [19]American Society of Testing Materials.The overview of ASTM[EB/OL].[2019-11-28].https://www.astm.org/ABOUT/overview.html. [20]张峰,邝岩.日本第十次国家技术预见的实施和启示[J].情报杂志,2016,35(12):12-15. [21]白璇,游玎怡.中日科研资助体系对比研究及启示[J].科技和产业,2018,18(4):100-104. [22]李香菊,贺娜.激励企业研发创新的税制研究:国际经验借鉴[J].中国科技论坛,2019(4):174-180. [23]周程.日本官产学合作的技术创新联盟案例研究[J].中国软科学,2008(2):48-57. [24]王珍珍,黎青青,鲍星华.创新创业生态系统下政府、高校、企业、社会的责任担当与协同发展——基于美、德、日三国的比较研究[J].中国科技论坛,2019(9):182-188. [25]屠海令,马飞,张世荣,等.中国新材料产业现状分析与前瞻思考[J].稀有金属,2019,43(11):1121-1130.
2022, 
