Abstract：The government has always encouraged the unhooking of science and technology associations.Chinese science and technology associations select different governance modes.Some select unhooking governance mode,the others select affiliation mode.In order to explore the selection mechanism behind this phenomenon,this paper constructed a three-dimensional influencing factors framework of“rule-resource-action”based on Giddens' structural theory.Through the cases study,the results are as follows.①When the science and technology associations' performance on the rule,resource and action factors can promote unhooking reform,the unhooking reform can success.②Rule,resource and action interact with each other.The rule factor is not affected by resource factor and action factor and has one vote veto power for the unhooking reform of science and technology associations.The resource factor can act on the action factor to stimulate the unhooking reform of science and technology associations.If the action factor is lacking,even the rule factor and resource factor can support the unhooking reform,the reform will not start.③Affiliation mode is not equal to the overall lack of autonomy.Even in the affiliated mode,science and technology associations can still obtain a certain degree of autonomy in governance structure,resource integration and service supply.
许文文. 脱钩抑或挂靠？中国科技社团治理模式选择机制研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(1): 39-47.
Xu Wenwen. Unhooking or Affiliation? Research on the Governance Mode Selection Mechanism of Chinese Science and Technology Associations. , 2023(1): 39-47.
[1]王春法.关于科技社团在国家创新体系中地位和作用的几点思考[J].科学学研究,2012(10):7-10. [2]陈姗姗,张向前.中国特色科技类社会组织发展战略研究[J].中国科技论坛,2018(7):1-8. [3]鲁云鹏.比较视角下典型国家科技社团治理模式特征的框架性研究[J].学会,2021(11):5. [4]潘惠彬,梁根乐.社团“挂靠体制”的弊端分析[J].学会,2006(6):42-44. [5]徐顽强,朱喆.市场化环境下科技社团生存状况及对策建议研究——以武汉市为例[J].科技管理研究,2015(18):59-65. [6]杨文志.学会改革的目标和路径选择[J].科协论坛,2003(5):10-16. [7]王孜丹,张理茜.学会挂靠体制的变革与未来[J].学会,2017(12):23-27. [8]高阳.学术性社会团体“去行政化”改革中的“底部优势”研究——以中国X学会为例[J].社会建设研究,2017(1):95-118. [9]宋程成,蔡宁,王诗宗.跨部门协同中非营利组织自主性的形成机制——来自政治关联的解释[J].公共管理学报,2013(4):1-11. [10]唐文玉,马西恒.去政治的自主性:民办社会组织的生存策略——以恩派(NPI)公益组织发展中心为例[J].浙江社会科学,2011(10):58-68. [11]HAN H J.Non-governmental organizations in China:the rise of dependent autonomy[J].China quarterly,2010(2):211-213. [12]顾昕,王旭,严洁.公民社会与国家的协同发展——民间组织的自主性、民主性和代表性对其公共服务效能的影响[J].开放时代,2006(5):103-112. [13]林磊.在地内生性:社会组织自主性的微观生产机制——以福建省Q市A社工组织为例[J].中国行政管理,2018(7):79-86. [14]费迪,王诗宗.中国社会组织独立性与自主性的关系探究:基于浙江的经验[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2014(1):18-26. [15]曾琰.超越“结构性自主”:中国社会组织发展的“内在性自主”导向及启示[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2017(6):131-137. [16]樊博,聂爽.城市应急恢复中非政府组织的自主性研究——整体性治理视域下的解读[J].上海行政学院学报,2016(2):23-33. [17]蔡宁,张玉婷,沈奇泰松.政治关联如何影响社会组织有效性——组织自主性的中介作用和制度支持的调节作用[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018(1):61-72. [18]黄晓春,嵇欣.非协同治理与策略性应对——社会组织自主性研究的一个理论框架[J].社会学研究,2014(6):98-123. [19]STEEN O I.Autonomy or dependency? Relations between non-governmental international aid organizations and government[J].International journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations,1996,7(2):147-159. [20]SCHROEDER M B.Executive leadership in the study of international organization:a framework for analysis[J].International studies review,2014,16(3):339-361. [21]徐家良,张其伟.地方治理结构下民间志愿组织自主性生成机制——基于D县C义工协会的个案分析[J].管理世界,2019(8):110-120. [22]朱喆,徐顽强.基于资源依赖行为的社会组织生存路径演化研究[J].广西社会科学,2021(4):10. [23]BERRETT J L,HOLLIDAY B S.The effect of revenue diversification on output creation in nonprofit organizations:are source dependence perspective[J].International journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations,2018,29(6):1190-1201. [24]王诗宗,宋程成,许鹿.中国社会组织多重特征的机制性分析[J].中国社会科学,2014(12):42-59. [25]安东尼·吉登斯,菲利普·萨顿.社会学基本概念[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2019. [26]YIN R K.Case study research:design and methods[M].California:Sage,2009. [27]林闽钢,战建华.社会组织的自主性和发展路径——基于国家能力视角的考察[J].治理研究,2018(1):58-64.
2023, 
