Abstract：In the era of technopolitics,the focus of international competition revolves around the scramble,layout and order construction of technological power.Profound changes have taken place in the driving structure of international S&T cooperation and strategies in major countries.Taking the technopolitical era as the driving force,this paper selects the international S&T strategies of China and America as the comparative research object.The ‘goal-idea-path’analysis framework is employed to compare the transformation directions in strategic goals,strategic philosophies and implementation paths.After that,the bibliometric analysis method is employed to further illustrate quantitative verification and specific analysis from three dimensions including the overall trend,the change of dominant position and the evolution of cooperation network.The multi-dimensional comparison results show the followings.①The strategic layout of China and America presents a differentiated trend in the era of technopolitics.America has gradually formed a “technology alliance”strategy centered on the framework of exclusive multilateralism,while China has turned from participating to leading in global innovation with “open innovation”as its core concept.②China is more affected by the changing times,and the cooperation demands released from previous Sino-US coordinationhave not been fully transferred and supplemented.③China has the potential for high-level international S&T cooperation and the optimized utilization of foreign research funding.④There is still room for continued cooperation between China and America on global challenges of common concern.Finally,this paper puts forward suggestions in aspects of strategies,tactics and operations.
胡雯, 鲍悦华. 技术政治时代下中美国际科技合作的战略转向比较研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(2): 168-179.
Hu Wen, Bao Yuehua. A Comparative Study on the Strategic Turn of International S&T Cooperation Between China and America in the Era of Technopolitics. , 2024(2): 168-179.
[1]唐新华.技术政治时代的权力与战略[J].国际政治科学,2021,6 (2):59-89. [2]凌胜利,雒景瑜.拜登政府的 “技术联盟”:动因、内容与挑战[J].国际论坛,2021,23 (6):3-25,155. [3]刘国柱.复合型模块化联盟:拜登政府应对大国竞争的联盟战略[J].同济大学学报 (社会科学版),2022,33 (2):34-49. [4]凌胜利,王彦飞.中美国际制度策略取向比较:基于议题领导权视角的分析[J].国际展望,2021,13 (5):67-88,155-156. [5]EDWARDS P N,HECHT G.History and the technopolitics of identity:the case of apartheid South Africa[J].Journal of Southern African studies,2010,36 (3):619-639. [6]GAGLIARDONE I. “A Country in Order”:technopolitics,nation building,and the development of ICT in Ethiopia[J].Information technologies and international development,2014,10:3-19. [7]KELLNER D.Globalisation,technopolitics and revolution[J].Theoria:a journal of social and political theory,2001,48 (98):14-34. [8]TRERÉ E.Reclaiming,proclaiming,and maintaining collective identity in the #YoSoy132 movement in Mexico:an examination of digital frontstage and backstage activism through social media and instant messaging platforms[J].Information,communication & society,2015,18 (8):901-915. [9]王慧中,文皓,樊永刚.国际科技外交发展趋势及政策启示[J].世界科技研究与发展,2019,41 (6):610-620. [10]SCHUBERT A,BRAUN T.International collaboration in the sciences 1981—1985[J].Scientometrics,1990,19 (1/2):3-10. [11]GUI Q,LIU C,DU D.Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration:a network perspective[J].Geoforum,2019,105:1-12. [12]HOU L,PAN Y,ZHU J J H.Impact of scientific,economic,geopolitical,and cultural factors on international research collaboration[J].Journal of informetrics,2021,15:101194. [13]CARY M,ROCKWELL T.International collaboration in open access publications:how income shapes international collaboration[J].Publications,2019,8 (1):13. [14]陈婧嫣,姜李丹,薛澜.跨国比较视阈下的人工智能政策:目标、理念与路径[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021,42 (3):87-100. [15]浦墨,袁军鹏,岳晓旭,等.国际合作科学计量研究的国际现状综述[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36 (6):56-68. [16]温军,张森,王思钦. “双循环”新发展格局下我国国际科技合作:新形势与提升策略[J].国际贸易,2021 (6):14-21. [17]王文平,刘云,何颖,等.国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究:基于文献计量学分析的视角[J].科研管理,2015,36 (3):127-137. [18]PISLYAKOVM V,SHUKSHINA E.Measuring excellence in Russia:highly cited papers,leading institutions,patterns of national and international collaboration[J].Journal of the association for information science and technology,2014,65 (11):2310-2330. [19]凌茜,汤建民.中国离世界科技强国还有多远:基于中美英德四国在世界顶尖期刊所发表论文的数据比较[J].科学与管理,2022,42 (6):10-18. [20]袁军鹏,薛澜.主导与协同:中国国际科技合作的模式和特征分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007 (11):5-9. [21]WANG X W,XU S M,WANG Z,et al.International scientific collaboration of China:Collaborating countries,institutions and individuals[J].Scientometrics,2013,95 (2):885-894. [22]岳晓旭,袁军鹏,潘云涛,等.中国国际科技合作主导地位变迁和效度分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37 (1):3-13. [23]樊春良.美国政府一年来在技术联盟与国际科学合作方面的进展及对策建议[EB/OL]. (2022-04-20)[2022-10-10].https://www.163.com/dy/article/H5D7B5C50511B355.html. [24]唐新华.西方 “技术联盟”:构建新科技霸权的战略路径[J].现代国际关系,2021 (1):38-46,64. [25]智广元.技术政治视野下新中国成立以来科技发展脉络与基本立场[J].甘肃理论学刊,2020 (5):20-28. [26]颜欢,李应齐,尚凯元,等.以科学繁荣发展造福各国人民[N].人民日报,2022-12-25 (3).
2024, 
