Research on the Impact of Peer Dual Carbon Policy Perception on Firm Innovation Performance
Zhang Xuefeng1, Wang Xing1, Yuan Guibo1, Xuan Zhaohui2
1. School of Economics and Management,North China University of Technology,Beijing 100144,China; 2. Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development,Beijing 100038,China
Abstract：Science and technology innovation is the key support to achieve the goal of“Double Carbon”,and how to fully mobilize the initiative of enterprise science and technology innovation has become an urgent problem to be solved.In this paper,we measured the peer perceptions of listed companies by the text econometric analysis,quantitatively analyzed the effect of peer perceptions on corporate innovation performance and explored the mechanism of this spillover effect.It is found that peer dual carbon policy perception can significantly increase the R&D intensity,patent applications and patent acquisitions of firms.An important channel of this innovation promotion effect is the transmission of dual carbon policy perception between industries and firms.External policies,firm and industry characteristics are important moderator variables of this innovation promotion effect.The results of this paper verify that cohesive industry consensus on carbon reduction can fully mobilize the initiative of firms' scientific and technological reserves and point out that incentive policies and the strategy of giving subsidies to special industries are crucial.
张雪峰, 王星, 袁贵博, 玄兆辉. 同行“双碳”政策感知对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(3): 132-141.
Zhang Xuefeng, Wang Xing, Yuan Guibo, Xuan Zhaohui. Research on the Impact of Peer Dual Carbon Policy Perception on Firm Innovation Performance. , 2024(3): 132-141.
[1]熊广勤,石大千,李美娜.低碳城市试点对企业绿色技术创新的影响[J].科研管理,2020,41(12):93-102. [2]徐佳,崔静波.低碳城市和企业绿色技术创新[J].中国工业经济,2020,393(12):178-196. [3]MA J,HU Q,SHEN W,et al.Does the low-carbon city pilot policy promote green technology innovation? Based on green patent data of Chinese A-share listed companies[J].International journal of environmental research and public health,2021,18(7):3695. [4]ZHANG Y J,SHI W,JIANG L.Does China's carbon emissions trading policy improve the technology innovation of relevant enterprises[J].Business strategy and the environment,2020,29(3):872-885. [5]姚星,陈灵杉,张永忠.碳交易机制与企业绿色创新:基于三重差分模型[J].科研管理,2022,43(6):43-52. [6]万煊,王俊.碳排放交易政策、产品转换与绿色产品创新——来自中国出口企业的经验与启示[J].国际贸易问题,2022,472(4):91-106. [7]CHEN Z,ZHANG X,CHEN F.Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2021,168:120744. [8]BARTRAM S M,HOU K,KIM S.Real effects of climate policy:financial constraints and spillovers[J].Journal of financial economics,2022,143(2):668-696. [9]何彦妮.碳交易市场对企业创新策略的影响及作用机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(7):37-48. [10]李姝,杜亚光,张晓哲.同行MD&A语调对企业创新投资的溢出效应[J].中国工业经济,2021,396(3):137-155. [11]MACHOKOTO M,GYIMAH D,NTIM C G.Do peer firms influenceinnovation[J].The British accounting review,2021,53(5):100988. [12]WANG J,ZHAO L,ZHU R.Peer effect on green innovation:evidence from 782 manufacturing firms in China[J].Journal of cleaner production,2022,380:134923. [13]TAN X,YAN Y,DONG Y.Peer effect in green credit induced green innovation:an empirical study from China's green credit guidelines[J].Resources policy,2022,76:102619. [14]FAN R,WANG Y,CHEN F,et al.How do government policies affect the diffusion of green innovation among peer enterprises? An evolutionary-game model in complex networks[J].Journal of cleaner production,2022,364:132711. [15]李畅,顾新,杨雪.企业技术创新会受到同行企业社会责任明星的影响吗[J].研究与发展管理,2022,34(6):118-130. [16]陈安琪,李永友.环境质量因地方政府的重视得到改善吗:基于文本挖掘的经验分析[J].财经论丛,2021,277(10):3-14. [17]赵景华,宋媛媛.领导人注意力影响地区碳治理:微观证据与作用机理[J].经济社会体制比较,2023,226(2):109-120. [18]SAUTNER Z,VAN LENT L,VILKOV Get al.Firm-level climate change exposure[J].The Journal of finance,2023 78(3):1449-1498. [19]HEO Y.Climate change exposure and firm cash holdings[DB/OL].(2021-03-01)[2023-09-22].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349987496. [20]YANG L,JIANG Y,ZHANG W,et al.An empirical examination of individual green policy perception and green behaviors[J].International journal of manpower,2020,41(7):1021-1040. [21]CHU F,ZHANG W,JIANG Y.How does policy perception affect green entrepreneurship behavior? An empirical analysis from China[J].Discrete dynamics in nature and society,2021,2021:1-9. [22]沈艳,陈赟,黄卓.文本大数据分析在经济学和金融学中的应用:一个文献综述[J].经济学(季刊),2019,18(4):1153-1186. [23]孔东民,石政.“双碳”目标下我国企业绿色技术创新的环境规制优化研究[J].税务与经济,2022,245(6):1-7. [24]崔也光,周畅,齐英.配额管制与市场披露促进了企业参加碳交易吗:基于试点地区上市公司的检验[J].中央财经大学学报,2018,371(7):51-59. [25]杨鑫瑶,蔡云鹏.上市公司自主创新同群效应研究[J].税务与经济,2023,247(2):70-81. [26]LIEBERMAN M B,ASABA S.Why do firms imitate eachother[J].Academy of management review,2006,31(2):366-385. [27]车帅.“节能低碳”政策能否实现企业绩效双赢[J].财经科学,2022,414(9):91-106. [28]王锋,葛星.低碳转型冲击就业吗——来自低碳城市试点的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2022,410(5):81-99. [29]王灿,张雅欣.碳中和愿景的实现路径与政策体系[J].中国环境管理,2020,12(6):58-64. [30]陈战光,李广威,梁田,等.研发投入、知识产权保护与企业创新质量[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(10):108-117. [31]巴曙松,吴丽利,熊培瀚.政府补助、研发投入与企业创新绩效[J].统计与决策,2022,38(5):166-169. [32]李长英,赵忠涛.技术多样化对企业创新数量和创新质量的影响研究[J].经济学动态,2020,712(6):15-29. [33]郝颖,黄雨秀,倪娟.外部竞争、创新积累与出口企业绩效[J].社会科学,2023,512(4):124-137. [34]PORTER M E.America's green strategy[J].Scientific American,1991,264(4):193-246. [35]魏丽莉,任丽源.碳排放权交易能否促进企业绿色技术创新:基于碳价格的视角[J].兰州学刊,2021,334(7):91-110. [36]张巧良.碳排放会计处理及信息披露差异化研究[J].当代财经,2010,305(4):110-115. [37]陈畴镛,童阳.中小微企业金融扶持政策的感知效应研究——以浙江省为例[J].治理研究,2019,35(4):99-106. [38]罗福凯,李启佳,庞廷云.企业研发投入的“同侪效应”检验[J].产业经济研究,2018,9706):10-21. [39]BECHER D A,MULHERIN J H,WALKLING R A.Sources of gains in corporate mergers:refined tests from a neglected industry[J].Journal of financial and quantitative analysis,2012,47(1):57-89. [40]李志斐,董亮,张海滨.中国参与国际气候治理30年回顾[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(9):202-210. [41]吕江.应对气候变化与生物多样性保护的国际规则协同:演进、挑战与中国选择[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(2):50-60. [42]周成.“双碳”政策的知识图谱、研究热点与理论框架[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2023,25(4):94-112. [43]刘仁厚,王革,黄宁,等.中国科技创新支撑碳达峰、碳中和的路径研究[J].广西社会科学,2021(8):1-7. [44]李清文,陆小成,资武成.中国典型区域低碳创新的模式构建与实践探索[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(22):6-12. [45]蔡中华,车翔宇,何浩东.中美贸易战对企业研发投资影响的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2023,41(3):472-480. [46]刘凤朝,默佳鑫,马荣康.高管团队海外背景对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J].管理评论,2017,29(7):135-147. [47]成力为,邹双.风险投资后期进入对企业创新绩效的影响研究——选择效应抑或增值效应[J].管理评论,2020,32(1):80-90. [48]张杰,陈志远,杨连星,等.中国创新补贴政策的绩效评估:理论与证据[J].经济研究,2015,50(10):4-17,33. [49]刘诗源,林志帆,冷志鹏.税收激励提高企业创新水平了吗:基于企业生命周期理论的检验[J].经济研究,2020,55(6):105-121. [50]金培振,殷德生,金桩.城市异质性、制度供给与创新质量[J].世界经济,2019,42(11):99-123. [51]孙传旺,罗源,姚昕.交通基础设施与城市空气污染——来自中国的经验证据[J].经济研究,2019,54(8):136-151. [52]孙晓华,车天琪,马雪娇.企业碳信息披露的迎合行为:识别、溢价损失与作用机制[J].中国工业经济,2023,418(1):132-150. [53]欧阳志远,史作廷,石敏俊,等.“碳达峰碳中和”:挑战与对策[J].河北经贸大学学报,2021,42(5):1-11. [54]袁淳,肖土盛,耿春晓,等.数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J].中国工业经济,2021,402(9):137-155. [55]黄速建,肖红军,王欣.论国有企业高质量发展[J].中国工业经济,2018,367(10):19-41.
2024, 
