中国科技论坛
  2025年4月4日 星期五     首 页    |    刊物介绍     |    编委会     |    征稿启事     |    理事会     |    编辑部公告     |    期刊订阅     |    广告服务     |    联系我们     |    
中国科技论坛  2024, Issue (3): 40-49    
  科研管理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
科研仪器平台评价体系的比较研究
王肖波1, 穆超1, 李锦钰2
1.中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,甘肃兰州 730000;
2.中国科学院近代物理研究所,甘肃兰州 730000
Comparative Study on Evaluation System of Scientific Instrument Platforms
Wang Xiaobo1, Mu Chao1, Li Jinyu2
1. Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and resources,Chinese Academy of Science,Lanzhou 730000,China;
2. Institute of Modern Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China
全文: PDF (7949 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 随着科技投入持续增加,科研仪器平台作为一种新型社会组织,与开放共享运行和评价考核一同受到广泛关注。然而,围绕科研仪器平台开放共享运行的评价体系还有待于进一步研究,以便明晰评价工作的效用和现实内涵。本文以中国科学院所属的科研仪器平台为例,基于管理部门目前公布的开放共享考核评价结果,从效率和效益评价的视角对评价工作进行排序分析和因果逻辑研究,旨在以不同评价方式结果差异的检验解析评价体系的合理性和适用性。结果表明,不同评价体系对应不同的结果,管理部门现行评价关注集约化运行的仪器设备开放率、使用率和共享率,兼顾实验技术人才队伍建设和稳定情况,导致这些差异的主要原因在于不同评价体系对多种属性指标的赋权有异。研究结论可为科研仪器平台评价体系的完善提供参考,为平台高效稳定运行和绩效提升提供合理指导,为创新资源的优化配置和效能提升提供决策依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王肖波
穆超
李锦钰
关键词 科研仪器平台开放共享常态化考评评价体系比较研究    
Abstract:With continuous increases in technological investment,scientific instrument platforms(SIPs),as a current type of indispensable social organization,have garnered widespread attention in conjunction with open and sharing operation and its administrative department evaluation.However,the evaluation system surrounding the open and sharing operation of SIPs requires further investigation to clarify the utility and practical implications of the evaluation work.Taking the SIPs affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences as an example,based on the published open and sharing evaluation results of the management department from Ministry of Science and Technology,this study conducts a ranking analysis and causal logic research from the perspective of efficiency and effectiveness evaluation.The aim is to examine the differences in evaluation results under different evaluation methods,dissecting the rationality and applicability of the evaluation system.The results indicate that different evaluation systems correspond to different outcomes,with the current evaluation by the management department focusing on the open,utilization,and sharing rates of instruments and equipment,while also considering the construction and stability of the experimental technical talent team.The main reason for these differences lies in the diverse weightings assigned to multiple attribute indicators by different evaluation systems.The conclusion provides a reference for the improvement of the evaluation system for SIPs,offering rational guidance for their efficient and stable operation and performance enhancement,and serving as a decision-making basis for optimizing the allocation of innovative resources and improving efficiency.
Key wordsScientific instrument platform    Open and sharing    Regular assessment    Evaluation system    Comparative study
收稿日期: 2023-04-14     
PACS:  G311  
基金资助:中国科学院兰州资源环境科学大型仪器区域中心自主知识课题“所级中心可持续性评价”(Lz201901)。
作者简介: 王肖波(1988—),男,浙江宁海人,工程师,博士,研究方向为可持续发展管理。
引用本文:   
王肖波, 穆超, 李锦钰. 科研仪器平台评价体系的比较研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(3): 40-49.
Wang Xiaobo, Mu Chao, Li Jinyu. Comparative Study on Evaluation System of Scientific Instrument Platforms. , 2024(3): 40-49.
链接本文:  
http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2024/I3/40
京ICP备10036465号-14
版权所有 © 2014 《中国科技论坛》杂志社
地址:北京市海淀区玉渊潭南路8号207室(100038) 电话:010-58884593/58884590/58884591 邮箱:zgkjlt3814@casted.org.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn