Abstract：The innovation ecosystem of national laboratories pursues strategic objectives at both macro and micro levels.At the macro level,the ecosystem aims to strengthen the national strategic scientific and technological strength and promote high-quality development.At the micro level,the focus is on achieving three functional goals for national laboratories including scientific and technological innovation,commercialization of scientific and technological achievements,and talent cultivation.The innovation ecosystem of national laboratories operates based on the logic of innovators interaction-resource integration-collaborative innovation-value co-creation.It relies on the talent-knowledge-technology ecosystem for intrinsic motivation while also requiring a scientific-technological-innovation policy framework to provide policy-driven initiatives and strategic guidance.This article delved into areas such as research facilities,research and development funding,talent cultivation,and commercialization of scientific and technological achievements.It analyzed the organizational models of the innovation ecosystems of national laboratories in countries such as the United States,Germany,the United Kingdom,and Italy.The article provided relevant suggestions to expedite the construction and layout of China's national laboratories.
倪君. 国家实验室创新生态系统:理论、经验与启示[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(6): 11-21.
Ni Jun. The Innovation Ecosystem of National Laboratories:Theory,Case and Implications. , 2024(6): 11-21.
[1]ANDER R.Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem[J].Harvard Business Review,2006,84 (4):191-195. [2]解学梅,余生辉,吴永慧.国外创新生态系统研究热点与演进脉络:基于科学知识图谱视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41 (10):20-42. [3]IANSITI M,LEVIEN R.Strategy as ecology[J].Harvard Business Review,2004,82 (3):68-81. [4]JACKSON D J.What is an innovation ecosystem[R].Arlington:National Science Foundation,2011. [5]CARAYANNIS E G,CAMPBELL D F J.Mode 3 and quadruple helix:toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem[J].International Journal of Technology Management,2009,46 (3/4):201-234. [6]柳卸林,杨培培,王倩.创新生态系统——推动创新发展的第四种力量[J].科学学研究,2022,40 (6):1096-1104. [7]曾国屏,苟尤钊,刘磊.从 “创新系统”到 “创新生态系统”[J].科学学研究,2013,31 (1):4-12. [8]周光礼.教育科技人才三位一体 共同支撑高质量发展[N].光明日报,2022-11-01 (15). [9]陈劲.科学、技术与创新政策[M].北京:科学出版社,2013. [10]国务院发展研究中心创新发展研究部.变局中的创新政策转型[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2020. [11]常旭华,仲东亭.国家实验室及其重大科技基础设施的管理体系分析[J].中国软科学,2021,366 (6):13-22. [12]Helmholtz.Helmholtz roadmap research infrastructures 2021[EB/OL]. (2021-08)[2023-04-10].https://www.helmholtz.de/forschung/forschungsinfrastrukturen/. [13]The National Science Foundation.FFRDC research and development expenditures:fiscal year 2021[EB/OL]. (2022-07-28)[2023-04-10].https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf22304. [14]鲁世林,李侠.国外顶尖国家实验室建设的主要特点、核心经验与顶层设计[J].科学管理研究,2023,41 (1):165-172. [15]The Department of Energy.The state of the DOE National Laboratories[EB/OL]. (2021-01-19)[2023-04-10].https://www.energy.gov/downloads/state-doe-national-laboratories-2020-edition. [16]马宗文,孙成永.意大利国家实验室的发展经验与启示:以国家核物理研究院的国家实验室为例[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2021,36 (11):39-45. [17]刘学之,马婧,彭洁,等.美国国家实验室成果转化路径解析与制度保障[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32 (11):20-25. [18]王贻芳.中国重大科技基础设施的现状和未来发展[J].科技导报,2023,41 (4):5-13.
2024, 
