Research on the Path of Breakthrough Technological Innovation of Science and Technology Leading Enterprises under the Dual Strangle Hold Situation of Technology and Ecology
Huo Ying1,2, Sun Hui3
1. School of Economics and Management,Harbin University of Science and Technology,Harbin 150080,China; 2. School of Management,Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology,Harbin 150022,China; 3. Institute of Electronic Technology,Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology,Harbin 150022,China
Abstract：Based on the perspective of collaborative catch-up,this paper adopts the exploratory multi case study method to analyze the breakthrough technology innovation path of the Science and Technology Leading Enterprises (S&TLEs)under the dual strangle hold situation of technology and ecology.The research finds the followings.①China's S&TLEs reduce the gap with foreign leading enterprises in technology and market mainly through two catch-up strategies which are original technology (TypeⅠ)and introducing technology (TypeⅡ),and breakthrough technological innovation is the main form;②S&TLEs that choose two kinds of catch-up strategies master key core technologies through the modes of“technology architecture source breakthrough”and“technology authorization and independent research breakthrough”respectively.TypeⅠS&TLEs break the technological ecological blockade through the mode of“technology alliance hedge breakthrough”.Both types of S&TLEs can reduce the business ecological constraints through the mode of“technology platform compatible breakthrough”;③The existence and rapid progress of the TypeⅠS&TLEs effectively promote the TypeⅡ S&TLEs to continuously obtain knowledge updates.On the contrary,the development and market competition of the TypeⅡS&TLEs accelerate the rapid improvement of product performance of the TypeⅠS&TLEs;④In the process of collaborative catch-up of breakthrough technological innovation,China's S&TLEs not only shoulder the leader's responsibilities of“double chain”,but also link the steady development of“four chains” (innovation chain,industry chain,supply chain,value chain)through the mode of“technology complementary and breakthrough”and achieve high-level technological self-reliance and self-improvement.
霍影, 孙辉. 技术和生态双元“卡脖子”情境下科技领军企业突破性技术创新路径研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(7): 110-122.
Huo Ying, Sun Hui. Research on the Path of Breakthrough Technological Innovation of Science and Technology Leading Enterprises under the Dual Strangle Hold Situation of Technology and Ecology. , 2024(7): 110-122.
[1]尹西明,陈劲,贾宝余.高水平科技自立自强视角下国家战略科技力量的突出特征与强化路径[J].中国科技论坛,2021(9):1-9. [2]吴晓波,付亚男,吴东雷,等.后发企业如何从追赶到超越:基于机会窗口视角的双案例纵向对比分析[J].管理世界,2019,35(2):151-167. [3]陈劲,阳镇.融通创新视角下关键核心技术的突破:理论框架与实现路径[J].社会科学,2021(5):58-69. [4]余江,陈凤,张越,等.铸造强国重器:关键核心技术突破的规律探索与体系构建[J].中国科学院院刊,2019,34(3):339-343. [5]陈劲,阳镇,朱子钦.“十四五”时期“卡脖子”技术的破解:识别框架、战略转向与突破路径[J].改革,2020(12):5-15. [6]奉小斌,李华华,马晓书.平行搜索对后发企业协同追赶的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2021,39(11):2013-2023. [7]李万,常静,王敏杰,等.创新3.0与创新生态系统[J].科学学研究,2014,32(12):1761-1770. [8]ADNER R.The wide lens:a new strategy for innovation[M].London,UK:Penguin,2012. [9]陈傲,柳卸林.突破性技术创新的形成机制[M].北京:科学出版社,2013. [10]尹西明,陈劲,刘畅.科技领军企业:定义、分类评价与促进对策[J].中国科技论坛,2021,21(6):1-8. [11]刘垠,操秀英.强化国家战略科技力量 呼唤世界一流科技领军企业[N].科技日报,2022-03-11(4). [12]EISENHARDT K M.Building theories from case study research[J].Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4):532-550. [13]苏敬勤,崔淼.工商管理案例研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2011年. [14]王凤彬,张雪.用纵向案例研究讲好中国故事:过程研究范式、过程理论化与中西对话前景[J].管理世界,2022(6):191-212. [15]LANGLEY A.Strategies for theorizing from process data[J].Academy of Management Review,1999(24):691-710. [16]闫佳祺,罗瑾琏,贾建锋,等.军民融合企业突破性创新的实现路径:基于上海天安的案例研究[J].南开管理评论,2022,25(1):145-156,201. [17]李树文,罗瑾琏,唐慧洁,等.资源约束情境下突破性创新能力的提升路径[J].科研管理,2022,43(10):42-50. [18]吴贵生,张洪石,梁玺.自主创新辩[J].技术经济,2010,29(9):6-11. [19]李占强.突破性技术创新机制案例研究[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2018. [20]王向阳,齐莹,郗玉娟.技术兼容性、惯例兼容性与跨国并购知识转移[J].科学学研究,2018,36(11):2030-2037,2112. [21]石林芬,胡翠平.原创技术的基本特征与研发要素[J].管理学报,2004,1(2):224-227. [22]陈劲.关键核心技术“卡脖子”问题突破路径研究[J].创新科技,2020(7):1-8. [23]高旭东.实现科技自立自强的核心要求与战略措施[J].清华管理评论,2021(5):54-63.
2024, 
