Evaluation on Regional Effective Supply of Technology and Influencing Factors in China
Yin Shi1,2, Li Baizhou1,2
1.School of Economics and Management,Harbin Engineering University,Harbin 150001,China; 2.Institute of Enterprise Innovation,Harbin Engineering University,Harbin 150001,China
Abstract：In order to objectively and accurately evaluate the effective supply of regional technological capability,and promote innovation-driven development strategy and orderly progress,the effective supply of technology were divided into R&D supply stage and application sharing stage.On this basis,this paper constructed the evaluation index system of the effective supply of regional technological capability.Then by using the two combination evaluation method,this paper established the evaluation model of regional technology effective supply capacity,and evaluated the effective supply ability of regional technology in 2014.The results show that:China's regional technology effective supply capacity is different,the overall level is not high;the lack of consumer-oriented core technology is the main reason for the overall level of China's effective supply capacity which is not high.R&D investment intensity and economic openness have positive effects on improving the effective supply capacity of regional technology,in which the role of economic opening level is more significant.
尹士, 李柏洲. 中国区域技术有效供给能力评价及影响因素[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(4): 128-137.
Yin Shi, Li Baizhou. Evaluation on Regional Effective Supply of Technology and Influencing Factors in China. , 2018(4): 128-137.
[1]TIMOTHY F B,MANUEL T.General purpose technologies:engines of growth[J].Journal of econometrics,1995,65(1):83-108. [2]WANG P,LIU Q.Game analysis on generic technology diffusion process in industry cluster[J].International business & management,2012,4(2):169-172. [3]BECHEIKH N,LANDRY R,AMARA N.Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector:a systematic review of the literature from 1993—2003[J].Technovation,2006,26(5-6):644-664. [4]RAMZI T,SALAH A B.The determinants of innovation capacity in the less innovative countries in the Euro-Mediterranean Region[J].Journal of the knowledge economy,2015:1-18. [5]OECD.New sources of growth:knowledge-based capital[M].Washington,USA:OECD Publishing,2013. [6]CORRADO C A,HASKEL J,JONA-Lasinio C,et al.Intangible capital and growth in advanced economies:measurement methods and comparative results[J].Social science electronic publishing,2012,7(3):225. [7]VITOLA A,SENFELDE M.Evaluation of institutions in innovation-driven economies[J].Economic science for rural development,2015,17(8):94-103. [8]万君康,凌丹,邹蔚.论技术有效供给[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(12):11-14. [9]于涛.中国37个工业行业技术供给能力的差异及原因[D].大连:大连理工大学,2008. [10]张海笔.供需视角下技术选择的动态均衡分析[J].中国科技论坛,2013,1(11):151-154. [11]贺正楚,张蜜,吴艳,等.生物医药产业共性技术服务效率研究[J].中国软科学,2014(2):130-139. [12]朱建民,金祖晨.国外关键共性技术供给体系发展的做法及启示[J].经济纵横,2016(7):113-117. [13]NASIEROWSKI W,ARCELUS F J.On the efficiency of national innovation systems[J].Socio-economic planning sciences,2003,37(3):215-234. [14]贾颖颖,郭鹏,赵静.基于基尼系数的区域创新投入产出熵权TOPSIS匹配性评价分析[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(2):208-214. [15]夏绪梅,贾博.基于熵权法的高技术产业破坏性创新能力综合评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014(14):114-118. [16]李美娟,陈国宏,徐林明,等.基于漂移度的动态组合评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(1):141-145. [17]李自琼,李向东,陈晓雪.基于灰色关联度的开发区创新转型能力综合评价研究[J].宏观经济研究,2015(12):115-120. [18]GUELLEC D.From R&D to productivity growth:Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter[J].Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics,2004,66(3):353-378. [19]向小东,陈丽芬.制造业技术创新效率评价模型及其应用研究[J].运筹与管理,2016,25(1):215-223.
2018, 
