Which Kinds of S&T Should be Strengthened to Drive Industry Innovation and Development in China? ——In the Perspective of Macro Patent Structure
Qiao Weiguo1,Zhang Yu1,2
1.Institutes of Sciences and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China; 2.Sino-Danish College,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
Abstract：The question that Which Kinds of S&T Should be Strengthened to Drive Industry Innovation and Development in China is urgent to be answered.Based on the relationship between patent classification and industry classification,patents are classified as 16 categories,and comparative analysis is taken with the data from Derwent Innovations Index database.This paper finds that,in American macro patent structure,there are the most patents in physical field and information technology field;the patents in industry technology,information technology and physics technology appear the situation of tripartite confrontation;besides the industrial technology and information technology,the innovation-driven industry development has depended on the breakthrough in basic research increasingly.In China,the number of patents increases rapidly,but the patent share of industrid technology and process operation is higher,while that in information technology and physical field lower.Therefore,for the innovation-driven industry development in China,the government not only need emphasize the breakthrough of industry technology,information technology,but also need promote basic research by means of more input from government and participation of enterprises.
乔为国,张玉. 新历史阶段驱动中国产业创新发展应加强哪类科技能力——基于专利宏观结构的研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(6): 67-74.
Qiao Weiguo,Zhang Yu. Which Kinds of S&T Should be Strengthened to Drive Industry Innovation and Development in China? ——In the Perspective of Macro Patent Structure. , 2018(6): 67-74.
[1]MANSFIELD E.Academic research and industrial innovation:an update of empirical findings[J].Research policy,1998,26(1):773-776. [2]柳卸林,何郁冰.我国基础研究是中国产业和技术创新的源泉[J].中国软科学,2011(4):104-117. [3]孙冰,林婷婷.我国高技术产业竞争力与技术创新的关系研究[J].中国科技论坛,2012(1):23-29. [4]周磊,杨威.基于专利引用的企业技术竞争研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014(3):42-48. [5]郑亚莉,宋慧.中国知识产权保护对高技术产业竞争力影响的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2012(2):147-155. [6]WOO S,JANG P,KIM Y.Effects of intellectual property rights and patented knowledge in innovation and industry value added:a multinational empirical analysis of different industries[J].Technovation,2015:49-63. [7]黄鲁成,成雨,吴菲菲,苗红,娄岩.基于专利分析的北京新能源汽车产业现状与对策研究[J].情报杂志,2012,31(5):1-6. [8]PRASAD R,K BANDYOPADHYAY T.Nanotechnology patents in the automotive industry(a quantitative & qualitative analysis)[J].Recent patents on nanotechnology,2014,8(3):200-214. [9]余江,陈凯华.中国战略性新兴产业的技术创新现状与挑战-基于专利文献计量的角度[J].科学学研究,2012,30(5):682-695. [10]WANG X,DUAN Y.Identifying core technology structure of electric vehicle industry through patent co-citation information[J].Energy procedia,2011(5):2581-2585. [11]BLOCH,MARC.Toward a comparative history of European societies[C].Enterprise and Secular Change,1953. [12]CLAPHAM,SIR John.Economic history as a discipline[J].Encyclopedia of the social sciences,1930:327-30. [13]杨利华.美国专利法史研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012. [14]CHANDERLER A D,AMATORI F,HIKINO T.Big business and the wealth of nations[M].Cambridge University Press,1997. [15]VANNEVAR Bush.Science,the endless frontier[R].United States,July 1945. [16]周娟,张玉.产业创新驱动发展中的基础研究主体——以物理学领域专利权人结构为例[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(11):14-18. [17]The 9th Science and Technology Foresight-Contribution of Science and Technology to Future Society-The 9th Delphi Survey[R].Japan,2010. [18]丁肇中.从物理实验中获得的体会[N].光明日报,2015-01-29(11).
2018, 
