Abstract：From the perspective of institutional research,this paper uses VAR model to study the impact of institutional change in the three-stage of technological innovation.The results show that institutional change has a positive impact effect on innovation efficiency,and the impact effect tends to be stable after a certain period.The impact effect on the innovation efficiency of different stages shows different characteristics.The impact of institutional change mainly plays a role in the stage of technical R&D stage and the stage of technical transformation on promoting innovation efficiency,principally and directly affecting the technical R&D stage.The further research finds that different categories of institution also have different impact on innovation efficiency.In order to improve the innovation efficiency of high-tech industry,the impact of the innovation efficiency in the technical R&D stage should be paid attention to.Then the paper suggests to adhere to the sound and standard institutional change,continue to deepen the reform of the market -oriented institutional mechanism,strengthen market supervision and institution standardization,provide innovative enterprises for financing channels,R&D subsidies and tax relief policies.
刘树林, 韩渭, 吴浩强. 技术创新三阶段中制度变迁的冲击效应——基于高技术产业的实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(8): 66-75.
Liu Shulin, Han Wei, Wu Haoqiang. Impact of Institutional Change in the Three-Stage of Technological Innovation ——An Empirical Study Based on High-tech Industry. , 2018(8): 66-75.
[1]CHEN C J,HUANG C C.A multiple criteria evaluation of high-tech industries for the science-based industrial park in Taiwan[J].Information & management,2004,41(7)839-851. [2]CHEN C J,WU H L,LIN B W.Evaluating the development of high-tech industries:Taiwan's science park[J].Technological forecasting & social change,2006,73(4):452-465. [3]GUAN J,CHEN K.Measuring the innovation production process:a cross-region empirical study of China's high-tech innovations[J].Technovation,2010,30(5)348-358. [4]陈凯华,官建成,寇明婷.中国高技术产业“高产出、低效益”的症结与对策研究——基于技术创新效率角度的探索,管理评论,2012(4):53-66. [5]董晓庆,赵坚,袁朋伟.国有企业创新效率损失研究[J].中国工业经济,2014(2):97-108. [6]代明,刘可新,陈俊.中国高技术产业研发创新效率研究[J].中国科技论坛,2016(1):5-10. [7]邓路,高连水.研发投入、行业内R&D溢出与自主创新效率——基于中国高技术产业的面板数据(1997—2007)[J].财贸研究,2009(5):9-14. [8]成力为,孙玮,王九云.引资动机、外资特征与我国高技术产业自主创新效率[J].中国软科学,2010(7):45-57,164. [9]戴魁早,刘友金.要素市场扭曲及创新效率——对中国高技术产业发展的经验分析[J].经济研究,2016(7):72-86. [10]韩庆潇,杨晨,李鹏.中国高技术产业知识溢出与创新效率分析[J].中国科技论坛,2015(2):67-71. [11]戴魁早,刘友金.市场化进程对创新效率的影响及行业差异——基于中国高技术产业的实证检验[J].财经研究,2013(5):4-16. [12]李后建,张宗益.金融发展、知识产权保护与技术创新效率—金融市场化的作用[J].科研管理,2014(12):160-167. [13]余泳泽.我国高技术产业技术创新效率及其影响因素研究——基于价值链视角下的两阶段分析[J].经济科学,2009(4):62-74. [14]桂黄宝.我国高技术产业创新效率及其影响因素空间计量分析[J].经济地理,2014(6):100-107. [15]肖仁桥,钱丽,陈忠卫.中国高技术产业创新效率及其影响因素研究[J].管理科学,2012(10):85-98. [16]HSIEH C T,KLENOW P J.Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India[J].The quarterly journal of economics,2009,124(4):1403-1448. [17]BROERSMA L,VAN DIJK J.The effect of congestion and agglomeration on multifactor productivity growth in Dutch regions[J].Journal of economic geography,2008,8(2):181-209. [18]HARPER M J,KHANDRIKA B,KINOSHITA R,et al.Nonmanufacturing industry contributions to multifactor productiity,1987—2006[J].Monthly labor review,2010,133(6):16-31. [19]王天娇.中国科技体制改革、科技资源配置与创新效率[J].经济问题,2014(2):33-39. [20]彭华涛.科技体制改革演进过程中的科技创新规律——基于《人民日报》1985—2013年标题的文本分析[J].科学学研究,2014(9):1313-1321. [21]陈明星,陆大道,张华.中国城市化水平的综合测度及其动力因子分析[J].地理学报,2009(4):387-398. [22]樊纲,王小鲁,朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2009年报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2010. [23]王小鲁,樊纲,余静文.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)[M].北京:经济科学文献出版社,2017. [24]刘树林,姜新蓬,余谦.中国高技术产业技术创新三阶段特征及其演变[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015(7):104-116.
2018, 
