Abstract：Although the public perception of technological risk is based on objective facts,there is a certain degree of“subjective construction”,and the subjective construction risk perception will not remain unchanged.The paper proposes that it would change with the trigger factors in reality,when the public perception of risk changes.In order to obtain the public's re-acceptance and support,we must make appropriate adjustments to the science and technology policy to enhance its adaptability.Based on the change of public acceptance policies of nuclear energy,this paper analyzes the change of public perception around the world,which leads to the adjustment and transformation of global nuclear power policy;And this paper puts forward that in order to ensure the sensitive and quick response of science and technology policy to public risk perception,it is necessary to establish the monitoring mechanism,investigation mechanism,response mechanism and public participation mechanism
孙壮珍. 风险感知视域下科技政策调适机制分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(10): 23-30.
Sun Zhuangzhen. The Adjustment Mechanism of Science and Technology Policy from the Perspective of Risk Perception. , 2018(10): 23-30.
[1]HOLTGRAVE D R,WEBER E U,HOLTGRAVE D R,WEBER E U.Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks[J].Risk analysis,1993,13(5):553-558. [2]陈振明.政策科学:公共政策分析导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003. [3]SLOVIC P,FISCHHOFF B,LICHTENSTEIN S.Rating the risks[J].Environment,1979,21(3):9-36. [4]SLOVIC P.Trust,emotion,sex,politics,and science:surveying the risk assessment battlefield[J].Risk analysis,1999,19(4):689-701. [5]SJÖBERG L.The allegedly simple structure of experts′ risk perception:an urban legend in risk research[J].Science technology & human values,2002,27(4):443-459. [6]SJÖBERG L.Explaining risk perception an empirical and quantitative evaluation of cultural theory[J].Risk decision policy,1997(2):30-113. [7]BREYER S.Breaking the vicious circle:toward effective risk regulation[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1993. [8]WYNNE B.Institutional mythologies and dual societies in the management of risk[M].Springer Berlin Heidelberg,1982. [9]WYNNE B.Uncertainty and environmental learning:reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm[J].Global environmental change,1992,2(2):111-127. [10]PIDGEON N F.Risk assessment,risk values and the social science programme:why we do need risk perception research[J].Reliability engineering and system safety,1998,59:5-15. [11]BOHNENBLUST H,SLOVIC P.Integrating technical analysis and public values in risk-based decision making[J].Reliab engng syst safety,1998,59(1):151-159. [12]SLOVIC P,FLYNN J H,LAYMAN M.Perceived risk,trust and the politics of nuclear waste[J].Science,1991,254:7-1603. [13]SJÖBERG L.Perceived competence and motivation in industry and government as factors in risk perception[M]//LOFSTEPT R E,CVETKOVICH G.Social trust and the management of risk.London:Earthscan,1999. [14]FLYNN J,BURNS W,MERTZ C K,SLOVIC P.Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository:analysis of a structural model[J].Risk analysis,1992,12:417-429. [15]SJÖBERG L.Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust[J].Risk analysis,2001,21:189-198. [16]SKITKA L J.Do the means always justify the ends,or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning[J].Personality and social psychology bulletin,2002,28:588-597. [17]SIEGRIST M,CONNOR M,KELLER C.Trust,confidence,procedural fairness,outcome fairness,moral conviction,and the acceptance of gm field experiments[J].Risk analysis,2012,32(8):56-78. [18]KASPERSON R E,RENN O,SLOVIC P,et al.The social amplification of risk:a conceptual framework[J].Risk analysis,1988,8(2):177-187. [19]乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].何博闻,译.南京:译林出版社,2004. [20]刘兵,侯强.科学传播中的议程设置[J].科技导报,2005,23(10):76-78. [21]保罗·斯洛维奇.T风险的感知[M].赵延东,林土垚,冯欣,等译.北京:北京出版社,2007. [22]KATSUYA T.Public response to the Tokai nuclear accident[J].Risk analysis,2001,21(6):1039-1046. [23]伯纳德·巴伯.科学与社会秩序[M].顾昕,译.北京:三联书店,1992. [24]孙小礼.DDT:从人类救星到禁止生产[N/OL].学习时报http://www.china.com.cn/xxsb/txt/2007-01/29/content_7731040.htm.2004-03-25. [25]孙壮珍,宋伟.环境决策中公众自主参与和政策的反思变迁——以典型事件为例证[J].理论月刊,2014(11):147-151. [26]黄辛.2015中国城市居民环保态度行为调查报告发布[EB/OL].科学网,www.sciencenet.cn.2015-07-27. [27]李毅.三里岛事故曾影响美国30年,核电发展停滞[N/OL].第一财经日报.http://finance.qq.com/a/20110316/000452.htm.2011-03-16. [28]三里岛事故-美国三里岛核电站事故[EB/OL].中国核电网http://np.chinapower.com.cn/201404/11/0038049.html.2014-04-11. [29]郭跃,汝鹏,苏竣.科学家与公众对核能技术接受度的比较分析——以日本福岛核泄漏事故为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(2):153-158. [30]OECD.Public Attitudes to Nuclear Power[M/OL].http:/ /www.oecd-nea.org /ndd /reports /2010 /nea6859-public-attitudes.pdf. [31]GOODFELLOW M J,WILLIAMS H R,AZAPAGIC A.Nuclear renaissance,public perception and design criteria:an exploratory review[J].Energy policy,2011,39(10):6199-6210. [32]HAYASHI M,HUGHES L.The Fukushima nuclear accidentandits effect on global energy security[J].Energy policy,2013,59(3):102-111. [33]IEA.World energy outlook[R].Paris:International Energy Agency,2011. [34]IAEA.Statement at press conference.Available at IAEA[EB/OL].http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/2012/amsp2012n005.htmlS.2012-03-05. [35]李建国,周文翠.社会风险治理创新机制研究[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2017(1):76-80. [36]何祖坤.关注政府回应[J].中国行政管理,2000(7):9-10. [37]马丽.我国公共决策研究新动向[N/OL].学习时报.http://123.gmw.cn/2015-07/23/content_16385299.htm.2015-07-20.
2018, 
