Abstract：In this paper,data of SMEs in Shanghai are used to study whether the government R&D subsidies can save the zombie firms,and the results show that:From the industry point of view,industries with labor-intensive characteristics and some knowledge-intensive industries accounts for a higher proportion of zombies,and industries which meet the basic living needs of residents account for a lower proportion of zombie firms;In the short run,government R&D subsidies can effectively prevent healthy firms from becoming zombie firms,but it will promote the zombie firms in the short and long run to be much more serious.Therefore,the government R&D subsidy policy should treat zombie firms as an important reference indicator,and the actual operation should identify and remove zombie firms as much as possible to achieve more effective allocation of public resources.
栾强, 罗守贵, 熊琦, 罗津. 政府研发资助是否能拯救僵尸企业——基于上海市中小企业的实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(10): 39-45.
Luan Qiang, Luo Shougui, Xiong Qi, Luo Jin. Can Government R&D Subsidies Save Zombie Firms? An Empirical Study Based on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Shanghai. , 2018(10): 39-45.
[1]KWON H U,NARITA F,NARITA M.Resource reallocation and zombie lending in Japan in the 1990s[J].Review of economic dynamics,2015(18):709-732. [2]何帆,朱鹤.僵尸企业的识别与应对[J].中国金融,2016(5):20-22. [3]申广军.比较优势与僵尸企业:基于新结构经济学视角的研究[J].管理世界,2016(12):13-24. [4]TAKALO T,TANAYAMA T,TOIVANEN O.Estimating the benefits of targeted R&D subsidies[J].Review of economics and statistics,2013,95(1):255-272. [5]GÖRG H,STROBL E.The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D[J].Economica,2007,74(294):215-234. [6]颉茂华,王瑾,刘冬梅.环境规制、技术创新与企业经营绩效[J].南开管理评论,2014,17(6):106-113. [7]MADDALA G S.Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1983. [8]KANCS A,SILIVERSTOVS B.R&D and non-linear productivity growth[J].Research policy,2016,45(3):634-646. [9]UN C A,ASAKAWA K.Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation:the benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain[J].Journal of product innovation management,2014,32(1):138-153.
2018, 
