Abstract：The intellectual property strategy's themes,goals,and policies tools are used to conduct a comprehensive and comparative analysis of China-Japan intellectual property strategy based on the documents of intellectual property policies issued by China and Japan in the period of 2002—2017,by comprehensively using a policy bibliometric method.The results show that:Japanese intellectual property strategy has an international perspective and characteristics of the times,its strategic objectives focus on improving international competitiveness,leading the development of intellectual property in the world,and actively using new technologies to boost the intellectual property system.While Chinese intellectual property strategy has distinctive Chinese characteristics,it is guided by the government's strategic guidance as the building of a strong intellectual property country,by decomposing the strategy into leading type,characteristic type,and supporting type for province,city and county.China and Japan have obvious differences in the use of policy tools,Japan tends to assist the government,support the content industry,and promote international standardization strategies.While China is more inclined to emphasize the function of the government that guides the strategy and plays a better role in strategies' organization,implementation and insurance.
林德明, 王宇开, 丁堃. 中日知识产权战略对比研究——战略主题、战略目标和政策工具[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(11): 168-177.
Lin Deming, Wang Yukai, Ding Kun. Comparison of Intellectual Property Strategy Between the China and Japan Based on the Strategy Topic,Strategy Target and Policy Tools. , 2018(11): 168-177.
[1]CZAPRACKA K.Competition law and intellectual property:the European perspective[J].European law review,2014,39(3):437-438. [2]MANSFIELD E.Intellectual property protection,direct investment and technology transfer:Germany,Japan and the USA[J].International journal of technology management,2000,19(2):3-21. [3]PITKETHLY RH.Intellectual property strategy in Japanese and UK companies:patent licensing decisions and learning opportunities[J].Research policy,2001,30(3):425-442. [4]DALIOT-BUL M.Japan brand strategy:the taming of'cool japan'and the challenges of cultural planning in a postmodern age[J].Social science Japan journal,2009,12(2):247-266. [5]吴汉东.利弊之间:知识产权制度的政策科学分析[J].法商研究,2006(5):6-15. [6]李东华,包海波,徐竹青.日本知识产权战略及其启示[J].中国软科学,2003(12):85-89+94. [7]冯晓青.美、日、韩知识产权战略之探讨[J].黑龙江社会科学,2007(6):157-161. [8]FREITAS M,TUNZELMANN N.Mapping public support for innovation:a comparison of policy alignment in theUK and France[J].Research policy,2008,37(9):1446-1464. [9]ROTHWELL R,ZEGVOLD W.Industrial innovation and pub-lic policy:preparing for the 1980s and the1990s[M].Santa Barbara:Greenwood Press,1981. [10]顾建光,吴明华.公共政策工具论视角述论[J].科学学研究,2007(1):47-51. [11]罗敏,朱雪忠.基于政策工具的中国低碳政策文本量化研究[J].情报杂志,2014(4):12-16. [12]黄萃,苏竣,施丽萍,程啸天.政策工具视角的中国风能政策文本量化研究[J].科学学研究,2011(6):876-882+889. [13]XU Z S,CHEN J.An overview of distance and similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].International journal of uncertainty fuzziness and knowledge-based systems,2008,16(4):529-555. [14]BILLE P,FAGERBERG R,GORTZ I L.Improved approximate string matching and regular expression matching on ziv-Lempel compressed texts[J].ACM transactions on algorithms,2009,6(1):52-62.
2018, 
