Is Streamlining Administrative Process and Decentralization,or Science and Technology Public Service Beneficial for SMEs?
Liu Yao1,Wu Jiannan1,2
1.School of International and Public Affairs of Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030,China; 2.Institute of Chinese Urban Governance of Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030,China;
Abstract：Based on the survey of 376 small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs),the effects of streamlining administrative process and decentralization and science and technology public service on innovation vitality of SMEs are investigated,and the moderating role of streamlining administrative process and decentralization are examined.The research shows that both of them can significantly promote the innovation vitality of SMEs.Streamlining administrative process and decentralization can significantly moderate the relationship between science and technology public service and enterprises' innovation vitality.In order to stimulate the innovation vitality of small and medium-sized enterprises,we put forward suggestions on implementing streamlining administrative process and decentralization more deeply and developing the role of“synergy”with other measures,reducing the red tape and rent-seeking in the public service of science and technology,strengthening the autonomy of small and medium-sized enterprises in the provision of services.
刘遥, 吴建南. 简政放权、科技公共服务还是双管齐下[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(12): 1-8.
Liu Yao,Wu Jiannan. Is Streamlining Administrative Process and Decentralization,or Science and Technology Public Service Beneficial for SMEs?. , 2018(12): 1-8.
[1]吴建南,刘遥,张攀.激发创新活力何以精准施策?基于两地数据的比较研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(8):112-118. [2]张来武.论创新驱动发展[J].中国软科学,2013(1):1-5. [3]中国企业家调查系统.新常态下的企业创新:现状、问题与对策——2015·中国企业家成长与发展专题调查报告[J].管理世界,2015(6):22-33. [4]夏后学,谭清美.简政放权与政府补贴如何影响技术创新[J].财贸经济,2017,38(5):129-146. [5]郑烨,吴建南,张攀.简政放权、企业活力与企业创新绩效[J].科学学研究,2017,35(11):1737-1749. [6]NISHIMURA J,OKAMURO H.Subsidy and networking:the effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy[J].Research policy,2011,40(5):714-727. [7]李晨光,张永安.区域创新政策对企业创新效率影响的实证研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(9):25-35. [8]王彦明,吕楠楠.简政放权理念下政府角色调适的公司法解读:以公司注册制改革为研究视角[J].东北师大学报(哲学),2015(6):1-8. [9]胡宗仁.政府职能转变视角下的简政放权探析[J].江苏行政学院学报,2015(3):106-111. [10]BOZEMAN B.A theory of government“red tape”[J].Journal of public administration research and theory,1993,3(3):273-304. [11]WALKER R M,BREWER G A.Can management strategy minimize the impact of red tape on organizational performance[J].Administration & society,2009,41(4):423-448. [12]BALDWIN J N.Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape:their impact on motivation[J].The American review of public administration,1990,20(1):7-28. [13]JONG G D,WITTELOOSTUIJN A V.Regulatory red tape and private firm performance[J].Public administration,2015,93(1):34-51. [14]周光辉.从管制转向服务:中国政府的管理革命——中国行政管理改革30年[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2008(3):18-28. [15]陈振明,樊晓娇.科技公共服务评价指标体系的构建[J].行政论坛,2014(5):48-55. [16]肖卫东.中小企业公共服务平台的功能定位与组织创新[J].学习与探索,2014(2):104-107. [17]TETHER B S,TAJAR A.Beyond industry-university links:Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants,private research organisations and the public science-base[J].Research policy,2008,37(6):1079-1095. [18]解学梅.中小企业协同创新网络与创新绩效的实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(8):51-64. [19]RAO H,DRAZIN R.Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals:a study of the mutual fund industry,1986-94[J].Academy of management journal,2002,45(3):491-507. [20]张震宇,陈劲.基于开放式创新模式的企业创新资源构成、特征及其管理[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(11):61-65. [21]WANG J.R&D activities in start-up firms:What can we learn from founding resources[J].Technology analysis & strategic management,2014,26(5):517-529. [22]HUSSAIN J,MILLMAN C,MATLAY H.SME financing in the UK and in China:a comparative perspective[J].Journal of small business and enterprise development,2006,13(4):584-599. [23]杜兰英,陈鑫.政产学研用协同创新机理与模式研究——以中小企业为例[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(22):103-107. [24]SAHA B.Red tape,incentive bribe and the provision of subsidy[J].Journal of development economics,2001,65(1):113-133. [25]European Commission.Innovation in the public sector:its perception in and impact on business[R/OL].[2012-06].http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/innobarometer_en. [26]JANSSEN M,ESTEVEZ E.Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less[J].Government information quarterly,2013,30(1):S1-S8.
2018, 
