Abstract:Patents and technical secret are important methods for protecting innovation and sustaining competitive advantages.Firms often have to choose between patent and secret since they are to some extent paradox referring to a specific innovation.This paper explores how firms protect their innovation in China based on the evolutionary game theory.Then,a model is built on the Netlogo software platform combining the evolutionary game model and Multi-agent modeling method which allows us to implement bounded rationality and interactivities.The simulation is run with different gain parameters and the results are checked by cross-validation.Finally,this paper draws conclusion and puts forwards some suggestions.
赵晓阳. 专利还是技术秘密——基于演化博弈视角的创新保护策略研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(3): 124-131.
Zhao Xiaoyang. Patents or Technical Secret? A dynamic View Based on Evolutionary Game Theory and Multi-agent Simulation. , 2019(3): 124-131.
[1]SOMAYA D.Patent strategy and management:an integrative review and research agenda[J].Journal of management,2012,38(4):1084-1114. [2]LEMLEY M A,SHAPIRO C.Probabilistic patents[J].Journal of economic perspectives,2005,19(2):75-98. [3]TEECE D J.Managing intellectual capital:organizational,strategic,and policy dimensions[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2000. [4]MANSFIELD E,SCHWARTZ M,WAGNER S.Imitation costs and patents:an empirical study[J].The economic journal,1981,91(364):907-918. [5]ZABY A K.Losing the lead:the patenting decision in the light of the disclosure requirement[J].Economics of innovation and new technology,2010,19(2):147-164. [6]JAMES S D,LEIBLEIN M J,LU S.How firms capture value from their innovations[J].Journal of management,2013,39(5):1123-1155. [7]ARUNDEL A.The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation[J].Research policy,2001,30(4):611-624. [8]COHEN W M,NELSON R R,WALSH J P.Protecting their intellectual assets:appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent(or not)[R].National Bureau of Economic Research,2000. [9]LEVIN R C,KLEVORICK A K,NELSON R R,et al.Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development[J].Brookings papers on economic activity,1987,1987(3),783-831. [10]李欣,梁琦.企业管理中技术保护模式的战略选择——谈专利和技术秘密的比较与结合[J].科技进步与对策,2004,21(10):120-122. [11]BROUWER E,KLEINKNECHT A.Innovative output,and a firm′s propensity to patent.:an exploration of CIS micro data[J].Research policy,1999,28(6):615-624. [12]HALL B,HELMERS C,ROGERS M,et al.The choice between formal and informal intellectual property:a review[J].Journal of economic literature,2014,52(2):375-423. [13]高山行,江旭,范陈泽,等.企业专利竞赛理论及策略[M].北京:科学出版社,2005. [14]ALEXANDRA K Zaby.Losing the lead:the patenting decision in the light of the disclosure requirement[J].Economics of innovation & new technology,2010,19(2):147-164. [15]ANTON J J,YAO D A.Little patents and big secrets:managing intellectual property[J].RAND journal of economics,2004,35(2):1-22. [16]KWON I.Patent races with secrecy[J].Journal of industrial economics,2012,60(3):499-516. [17]SCHNEIDER C.Fences and competition in patent races[J].International journal of industrial organization,2008,26(6):1348-1364. [18]KULTTI K,TAKALO T,TOIKKA J.Simultaneous model of innovation,secrecy,and patent policy[J].The American economic review,2006,96(2):82-86. [19]KULTTI K,TAKALO T,TOIKKA J.Secrecy versus patenting[J].The rand journal of economics,2007,38(1):22-42. [20]MOSEL M.Big patents,small secrets:how firms protect inventions when R&D outcome is heterogeneous[R].Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics Discussion Paper,2011. [21]MIHM J,STING F J,WANG T.On the effectiveness of patenting strategies in innovation races[J].Management science,2015,61(11):2662-2684. [22]FRIEDMAN D.Evolutionary games in economics[J].Econometrica,1991,59(3):637-666. [23]TAYLOR P D,JONKER L B.Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics[J].Mathematical biosciences,1978,40(1):145-156. [24]TAN J,ZHANG H,WANG L.Network closure or structural hole?The conditioning effects of network-level social capital on innovation performance[J].Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2015,39(5):1189-1212.