Abstract：This paper first uses the dynamic super-efficient SBM model to measure the innovation efficiency of 104 national high-tech industrial development zones in China.Then it empirically analyzes the impact of trade on the innovation performance of high-tech zones from the two aspects of the city's trade environment and its own trade level.The study finds that the urban trade environment has significantly promoted the growth of innovation performance in high-tech zones.And this effect is significantly different in the three levels of the municipality and the special economic zones,sub-provincial cities and planned cities,and general prefecture-level cities.The general prefecture-level cities are more sensitive to the urban trade environment,and more susceptible to urban economic development and the hardware and software conditions of high-tech zone.On the contrary,the rise of the level of trade in the high-tech zone has not driven the pace of innovation,mainly leading to the simple expansion of the scale of trade,and it cannot help to accelerate the efficiency of research and development and innovation
熊然, 卫平. 贸易视角下高新区创新绩效研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(8): 35-43.
Xiong Ran, Wei Ping. Innovation Performance of High-tech Zones from the Perspective of Trade. , 2019(8): 35-43.
[1]埃弗雷特M罗杰斯,朱迪斯K拉森.硅谷热[M].范国鹰,译.北京:经济科学出版社,1985. [2]SAXENIAN A.Regional advantage:culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128[M].Boston:Harvard University Press,1994. [3]YANG C H,MOTOHASHI K,CHEN J R.Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative[J].Research policy,2008,38 (1):77-85. [4]DIEZ-VIAL I,FERNÁNDEZ-OLMOS M.The effect of science and technology parks on a firm′s performance:A dynamic approach over time[J].Journal of evolutionary economics,2017,27 (3):413-434. [5]LIBERATI D,MARINUCCI M,TANZI G M.Science and technology parks in Italy:Main features and analysis of their effects on the firms hosted[J].Journal of technology transfer,2016,41 (4):694-729. [6]ALBERTO A,ANDRÉS B,SALVADOR P,et al.The influence of science and technology park characteristics on firms′ innovation results[J].Regional science,2018,97 (2):253-280. [7]吕政,张克俊.国家高新区阶段转换的界面障碍及破解思路[J].中国工业经济,2006 (2):5-12. [8]闫国庆,孙琪,陈超,等.国家高新技术产业开发区创新水平测度指标体系研究[J].中国软科学,2008 (4):141-148. [9]胡树华,解佳龙,王松,等.基于多级模糊综合评价法的国家高新区竞争力研究[J].软科学,2011,25 (5):53-56. [10]谢子远.国家高新区集聚效应实证研究[J].科研管理,2014,35 (5):138-144. [11]姜彩楼,徐康宁.区位条件、中央政策与高新区绩效的经验研究[J].世界经济,2009 (5):56-64. [12]程郁,陈雪.创新驱动的经济增长——高新区全要素生产率增长的分解[J].中国软科学,2013 (11):26-39. [13]顾元媛,沈坤荣.简单堆积还是创新园地?——考察高新区的创新绩效[J].科研管理,2015,36 (9):64-71. [14]刘满凤,李圣宏.基于三阶段DEA模型的我国高新技术开发区创新效率研究[J].管理评论,2016,28 (1):42-52,155. [15]胡贝贝,王胜光,张秀峰.创新经济体知识生产中的规模递增效应——基于中国高新区的实证检验[J].科研管理,2017,38 (2):52-58. [16]BATTESE G E,COELLI T J.A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data[J].Empirical economics,1995,20 (2):325-332. [17]GUAN J,CHEN K.Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems[J].Research policy,2012,41 (1):102-115. [18]CHEN K,GUAN J.Measuring the efficiency of China′s regional innovation systems:Application of network data envelopment analysis (DEA)[J].Regional studies,2012,46 (3):355-377. [19]郑玉雯,薛伟贤,王萌.基于SBM动态网络模型的中国高新区效率评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27 (1):41-52. [20]TONE K,TSUTSUI M.Network DEA:A slacks-based measure approach[J].European journal of operational research,2009,197 (1):243-252. [21]ROMER M.Increasing returns and long-run growth[J].Journal of political economy,1986,94 (5):1002-1037. [22]LUCAS R E B.Demand for India′s manufactured exports[J].Journal of development economics,1988,29 (1):63. [23]KRUGMAN,HELPMAN.Market structure and foreign trade[M].Cambridge:The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press,1985. [24]杨畅,白雪洁,闫文凯.发展的困局:贸易推动下的高新区绩效[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2013,30 (9):106-121. [25]祁毓,郭均均.FDI会影响地方政府效率吗[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012,29 (2):21-36. [26]腾堂伟,曾刚.集群创新与高新区转型[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
2019, 
