Abstract：Although the artificial narrow intelligence possesses the deep learning ability,it has not yet generated the self-consciousness and emotion.It should be regarded as the object of the legal relationship.In the infringement cases involving artificial intelligence,the manufacturers have advantages in terms of casual investigation and technical control,thus to build a responsibility distribution system based on the product liability is the optimal choice to balance each party's rights.Besides,manufacturers can mitigate their responsibilities through liability restrictions,taxes,funds and insurance.However,manufacturers are still burdened with the obligations of the burden of proof,training,warning,maintenance and disclosure because of the specific characteristic of artificial intelligence.Under the challenge of the artificial narrow intelligence,the existing legal system must respond to the progress of science and technology under the premise of coordination stability and adaptability.
钱思雯. 弱人工智能时代的法律回应——构建以产品责任为核心的责任分配体系[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(9): 76-84.
Qian Siwen. The Legal Response of the Era of Artificial Narrow Intelligence ——Establishing a Responsibility Distribution System focusing on Product Responsibility. , 2019(9): 76-84.
[1]RUSSEL S,NORVING P.人工智能:一种现代方法:第2版[M].姜哲,译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2004. [2]党家玉.人工智能的伦理与法律风险问题研究[J].信息安全研究,2017 (12):1081. [3]WEAVER J F.Robots are people too:How siri,google car,and artificial intelligence will force us to change our laws[M].Santa Barbara:Praeger Publishers,2013:9. [4]KURZWEIL Ray.奇点临近[M].李庆诚,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2011. [5]KOWERT W.The foreseeability of human-artificial intelligence interactions[J].Texas law review,2017 (96):183,192. [6]SOLUM L B.Legal personhood for artificial intelligence[J].North Carolina law review,1992 (70):1225-1287. [7]袁曾.人工智能有限法律人格审视[J].东方法学,2017 (5):50. [8]BAYERN S,BURRI T,GRANT T D,et al.Company law and autonomous systems:A blueprint for lawyers,entrepreneurs,and regulators[J].Hastings science and technology law journal,2017(9):135-161. [9]HUBBARD F P.Sophisticated robots:Balancing liability,regulation,and innovation[J].Florida law review,2014 (66):862-1865. [10]郑娟,赵岩林.电子代理人法律问题探析[J].政法论丛,2004 (1):51-52. [11]WAGNER G.Children as tortfeasors under germany law[M]//MARTN-CASALS Miquel.Children in tort law,part I:Children as tortfeasors.New York:Springer-Verlag Wien New York,2006:243-244.. [12]杨立新.人身权法论析[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2006:862. [13]DUFFY S H,HOPKINS J P.Sit,stay,drive:The future of autonomous car liability[J].SMU Sci.& Tech.L.Rev.,2013 (16):473-476. [14]HOLMES JR O W.The common law[M].Boston:Little,Brown,and Company,1881:117. [15]陆默.AI侦探:探索 “黑匣子”秘密[J].世界科学.2017 (9):25-27. [16]BRODSKY J S.Autonomous vehicle regulation:How an uncertain legal landscape may hit the brakes on self-driving cars[J].Berkeley Tech.L.J.,2016 (31):865. [17]MARCHANT G E,LINDOR R A.The coming collision between autonomous vehicles and the liability system[J].Santa Clara Law review,2012 (52):1331,1337. [18]BROCK C.Where we′re going,we don′t need drivers:The legal issues and liability implication of autonomated vehicle technology[J].UMKC L.Rev.,2015 (83):782-783. [19]GEISTFELD M A.A roadmap for autonomous vehicles:State tort liability,automobile insurance,and safety regulation[J].Cal.L.Rev.,2017 (105):1659. [20]WEBB K C.Products liability and autonomous vehicles:Who′s driving whom[J].Rich.J.L.& Tech.,2017 (23):34-37. [21]GRAHAM K.Of frightened horses and autonomous vehicles:Tort law and its assimilation of inventions[J].Santa clara law review,2012 (51):1270. [22]苏力.法律与科技问题的法理学重构[J].中国社会科学,1999 (5):65-68. [23]李开复,王咏刚.人工智能[M],北京:文化发展出版社,2017:181. [24]栾爽.无人机法律规制问题论纲[J].南京航空航天大学学报 (社会科学版),2017,19 (1):35-36. [25]罗斯科·庞德著,邓正来.法律史解释[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2002:1. [26]吴汉东.人工智能时代的制度安排与法律规制[J].法律科学:西北政法大学学报,2017,35 (5):128.
2019, 
