Research on the Ownership in the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements
Luo Dajin1,Wang Xueying2,Chang Jing2
1.Antai School of Economics and Management,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030,China; 2.Shanghai Institute for Science of Science,Shanghai 200235,China
Abstract：At present,we are reforming the system of granting researchers' ownership or long-term use rights of scientific and technological achievements,and the theoretical research and empirical analysis need to be studied further.Based on the principle of Pareto-optimality,this paper makes a theoretical exploration on the ownership and long-term use rights of scientific and technological achievements granted to researchers,analyzes the system design and experience of the ownership of scientific and technological achievements in Britain,the United States and Japan,and discusses the bottleneck of achievement transformation and local reform practice in China.On this basis,the emphasis of granting researchers ownership or long-term use rights to scientific and technological achievements is considered to be the reform of systems.The article also puts forward suggestions on reforming science and technology state-owned intangible assets management system,increasing the autonomy of institutions in managing their scientific and technological achievements,promoting and carrying out authorization agreements.
骆大进,王雪莹,常静. 关于科技成果转化中成果权属问题的研究与思考[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(10): 164-170.
Luo Dajin,Wang Xueying,Chang Jing. Research on the Ownership in the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements. , 2019(10): 164-170.
[1]丁明磊.地方探索职务科技成果权属混合所有制改革的思考与建议[J].科学管理研究,2018(1):17-20+45. [2]康凯宁,刘安玲,严冰.职务科技成果混合所有制的基本逻辑——与陈柏强等三位同志商榷[J].中国高校科技,2018(11):47-50. [3]肖尤丹.职务发明权属国家所有研究——兼论中国专利法中的国家所有权[J].中国科技论坛,2018(11):77-86. [4]万浩,黄武双.论国有科技成果权属制度——使用权“类所有权”化[J].科技与法律,2019(1):40-49. [5]COASE R H.The problem of social cost[J].Journal of law and economics.1960,3(1):1-44. [6]王志波,郑乾国.产权、交易费用及其现实意义——“科斯定理”给我们的启示[J].社科纵横,1997(4):36-37. [7]黄武双,金莹,张洁琼,等.美国技术创新与技术转让激励政策解读[M].北京:法律出版社,2016. [8]隆云滔,张富娟,杨国梁.斯坦福大学技术转移运转模式研究及启示[J].科技管理研究,2018(15):120-126. [9]李世兰.牛津大学科技创新成果转化的经验及对广州的借鉴[J].广东经济,2018(11):64-67. [10]罗涛.剑桥大学技术转移和商业化的经验[J].高科技与产业化,2013(4):104-108. [11]ALDO Geuna,FEDERICA Rossi.Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting[J].Research policy,2011(40):1068-1076. [12]田凤.日本国立大学法人化改革及其启示[J].教育研究,2018(8):148-152+159. [13]林兰.东京产学研合作创新的经验与启示[J].科技中国,2018(10):31-37. [14]张寒.意大利国家创新体系的特点及对我国的启示[J].学理论,2017(11):110-113. [15]乔永忠,朱雪忠,万小丽,等.国家财政资助完成的发明创造专利权归属研究[J].科学学研究,2008(4):104-108. [16]许慧.加拿大技术转移体系构成与大学专利政策变革的启示[J].科技成果,2007(7):23-25. [17]MARTIN Kenney,DONALD Patton.Does inventor ownership encourage university research-derived entrepreneurship?A six university comparison[J].Research policy,2011(40):1100-1112. [18]肖尤丹.中国科技成果转化制度体系——法律、政策及其实践[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2001. [19]陈强,鲍悦华,常旭华.高校科技成果转化与协同创新[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2017. [20]张铭慎,安建军.赋予科技人员科研成果所有权的理论思考与四川实践[J].中国经贸导刊,2018(16):21-25. [21]吴寿仁.科技成果转化若干热点问题解析(十四)——科研人员科技成果所有权探析[J].科技中国,2018(7):28-36. [22]刘群彦,姚禹.高校组织管理行为与技术转移绩效——基于34所教育部直属高校的实证分析[J].中国高校科技,2018(11):12-17. [23]姚阳.制度经济视角下高校科技成果混合所有制研究[J].北方经贸,2017(7):27-28. [24]陈震.关于职务发明人优先受让权的思考[J].中国科技论坛,2007(3):86-89. [25]盛华定,谢萍,翟亚贞,等.从物权法原理谈职务科技成果的转化[J].江苏科技信息,2009(7):15-17. [26]刘群彦.高校科研人员成果转化权和优先受让权研究[J].行政与法,2019(1):124-129.
2019, 
