The Co-Evolution Path of Innovation Situation, Absorptive Capacity and Open Innovation
Yang Lei1, Liu Haibing1,2
1.School of Economics and Management, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2.School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China
Abstract：Based on the external situation and internal ability of the organization,this paper takes how to implement open innovation as the problem-oriented,and selects the cross-case study of Huawei,Haier and Procter & Gamble.This paper attempts to explore the co-evolution path of situation and open innovation,in which absorptive capacity is regarded as an important participating variable.The results are as follows.①The dynamic change of open innovation path with innovation situation shows the law of “internal dependence-inside type (IDIT)—dominant participation-coupled type (DPCT)—community creation-coupled type (CCCT)”.②The open innovation model has a high matching with the innovation situation.③The possible influencing factors of the open direction of open innovation are industry attribute,technology life cycle and corporate culture.④Absorptive capacity is not only the premise of the implementation of open innovation,but also the goal of open innovation.The evolution of absorptive capacity is not only the premise and foundation of open innovation,but also the goal of open innovation.The evolution of absorptive capacity plays an important role in promoting the change of open innovation,together with the innovation situation,they form a co-evolution model.
杨磊, 刘海兵. 创新情境、吸收能力与开放式创新共演路径——基于华为、海尔、宝洁的跨案例研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(2): 36-45.
Yang Lei, Liu Haibing. The Co-Evolution Path of Innovation Situation, Absorptive Capacity and Open Innovation. , 2020(2): 36-45.
[1]CHESBROUGH H.Open innovation:the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[M].Boston MA:Harvard Business School Press,2003. [2]高良谋,马文甲.开放式创新:内涵、框架与中国情境[J].管理世界,2014(6):157-169. [3]LAURSEN K,SALTER A.Searching high and low:what type of firms use universities as a source of innovation[J].Research policy,2004,33(8):1201-1215. [4]CHESBROUGH H,CROWTHE R A.Beyond high tech:early adopters of open innovation in other industries[J].R&D management,2006,36(3):229-236. [5]刘海兵.创新情境、开放式创新与创新能力动态演化[J].科学学研究,2019(9):17-30. [6]CHRISTENSEN J F,OLESEN M H,KJAER J S.The industrial dynamics of open innovation:evidence from the trails formation of consumer electronics[J].Research policy,2005,34(10):1533-1549. [7]MILLER D,CHEN M J.Sources and consequences of competitive inertia:a study of the US airline industry[J].Administrative science quarterly,1994,39(1):1-23. [8]COHEN W M,LEVINTHAL D A.Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning and innovation[J].Administrative science quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152. [9]TODOROVA G,DURISIN B.Absorptive capacity:valuing a re-conceptualization[J].Academy of management review,2007,32(3):774-786. [10]EISENHARDT K.Building theories from case study research[J].Academy of management review,1989,14(3):532-550. [11]PAN S,TAN B.Demystifying case research:a structured pragmatic situational(SPS) approach to conducting case studies[J].Information & organization,2011,21(3):161-176. [12]吴画斌,陈政融,许庆瑞.企业创新能力提升的机制——基于海尔集团1984—2017年纵向案例研究[J].中国科技论坛,2019(3):80-91.
2020, 
