Abstract：In this study,the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars 1998—2016 are chosen as the research subjects,and the CVs of 236 scholars are selected and coded in depth so as to examine the impact of their higher education experiences on academic career development.As the empirical results show,the winners of National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars with continuous higher education from bachelor to doctor spent less time becoming assistant professor,but the influence tends to be not significant as their career development enters the professional title phase.Compared with male fund winners,female fund winners' career growth is faster at the professional title phase.Furthermore,the flow of units from high to low will increase the risk of survival of the professors and further accelerate their career growth.
张建卫, 李海红, 乔红, 王健. 生存分析视角下杰出青年科技人才的成长路径研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(3): 158-165.
Zhang Jianwei, Li Haihong, Qiao Hong, Wang Jian. A Study on Growth Path of Distinguished Young Scholars:The Perspective of Survival Analysis. , 2020(3): 158-165.
[1]高阵雨,陈钟,刘权,等.国家杰出青年科学基金20周年回顾与展望[J].中国科学基金,2014(3):175-178. [2]SIMONTON D K.Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior:the integration of product,person,and process perspectives[J].Psychological bulletin,2003,129(4):475-494. [3]BERRY C.The Nobel scientists and the origins of scientific achievement[J].British journal of sociology,1981,32(3):381-391. [4]YOUTIE J,ROGERS J,HEINZE T,et al.Career-based influences on scientific recognition in the United States and Europe:longitudinal evidence from curriculum vitae data[J].Research policy,2013,42(8):1341-1355. [5]TIAN F.Skilled flows and selectivity of Chinese scientists at global leading universities between 1998 and 2006[J].Journal of science & technology policy in China,2013,4(2):99-118. [6] CAIBANO C,OTAMEND J,ANDUJAR I.Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis:the case of the Ramón y Cajal programme in Spain[J].Research evaluation,2008,17(1):17-31. [7]STEPHAN P E,LEVIN S G.Age and the Nobel prize revisited[J].Scientometrics,1993,28(3):387-399. [8]白春礼.杰出科技人才的成长历程:中国科学院科技人才成长规律研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:13-24. [9]吴殿廷,刘超,顾淑丹,等.高级科学人才和高级科技人才成长因素的对比分析——以中国科学院院士与中国工程院院士为例[J].中国软科学,2005(8):70-75. [10]陈晓剑,李峰,刘天卓.基础研究拔尖人才的关键成长路径研究——基于 973 计划项目首席科学家的分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29(1):44-48. [11]李祖超,钟苹,李冬东.国家杰出青年科学基金获资助者的成长历程研究——基于稀疏矩阵与粒子群算法的综合分析[J].高等工程教育研究,2016(6):81-86. [12]郭美荣,彭洁,赵伟,等.中国高层次科技人才成长过程及特征分析:以“国家杰出青年科学基金”获得者为例[J].科技管理研究,2011,31(1):135-138. [13]FUKUZAWA N.An empirical analysis of the relationship between individual characteristics and research productivity[J].Scientometrics,2014,99(3):785-809. [14]WEISSHAAR K.Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia[J].Social forces,2017,96(2):529-560. [15]杨芳娟,刘云,侯媛媛,等.中国高被引学者的跨国流动特征和影响——基于论文的计量分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(9):23-37. [16]牛珩,周建中.基于CV分析方法对中国高层次科技人才的特征研究——以“百人计划”“长江学者”和“杰出青年”为例[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012,28(2):96-102. [17]李峰,吴蝶.高等教育背景如何影响不同学科科技人才成长——以教育部长江学者特聘教授为例[J].高等教育研究,2016,37(10):42-48. [18]田瑞强,姚长青,袁军鹏,等.基于履历信息的海外华人高层次人才成长研究:生存风险视角[J].中国软科学,2013(10):59-67. [19]张建卫,王健,周洁,等.高校高层次领军人才成长的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(2):235-244. [20]徐飞,陶爱民.中国工程院女性院士特征状况的计量分析[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(22):182-185. [21]SAVICKAS M L.Career construction theory and practice[J].Career development and counseling:putting theory and research to work,2013(2):144-180. [22]SUPER D E,KNASEL E G.Career development in adulthood:some theoretical problems and a possible solution[J].British journal of guidance and counselling,1981,9(2):194-201. [23]李丹,马彪,陈曦,等.国家自然科学基金分配中的“马太效应”及其变化分析[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(16):20-25. [24]樊桂清,贾相如.高校科研领域内“马太效应”对青年教师发展影响研究[J].高校教育管理,2013,7(2):70-74.
2020, 
