Abstract：The intellectual history of the concept of“innovation”and the development of the innovation studies shows that there is a“pro-innovation bias”which leads to neglect of the social consequences of innovation-especially the unintended and undesirable consequences.With the expansion of the impact of innovation and the increase of risks,the issues of consequences and responsibilities cannot be ignored,which calls for a theoretical concept of responsible innovation.
[1]GODIN Benoit.An old word for a new world,or the de-contestation of a political and contested concept[C]//SVEIBY K E,GRIPENBERG P,SEGECRANTZ B.Challenging the innovation paradigm.London:Routledge,2012. [2]GODIN Benoit.Innovation contested:the idea of innovation over the centuries[M].London:Routledge,2015. [3]GRIPENBERG P,SVEIBY K E,SEGERCRANTZ B.Challenging the innovation paradigm:the prevailing pro-innovation bias[C]//SVEIBY K E,GRIPENBERG P,SEGECRANTZ B.Challenging the innovation paradigm.London:Routledge,2012. [4]默顿.社会理论和社会结构[M].唐少杰,齐心,译,南京:译林出版社,2008. [5]ROGERS E M.Diffusion of innovations[M].3th ed.New York:Free Press,1983. [6]FOUGERE Martin,HARDING Nancy.On the limits of what can be said about‘innovation’:interplay and contrasts between academic and policy discourses[C]//SVEIBY K E,GRIPENBERG P,SEGECRANTZ B.Challenging the innovation paradigm.London:Routledge,2012. [7]SVEIBY K E,GRIPENBERG P,SEGECRANTZ B.The unintended and undesirable consequences:neglected by innovation research[C]//SVEIBY K E,GRIPENBERG P,SEGECRANTZ B.Challenging the innovation paradigm.London:Routledge,2012. [8]法格博格.创新:文献综述[C]//柳卸林,郑刚,蔺雷,等译.法格博格,莫利,纳尔逊.牛津创新手册,北京:知识产权出版社,2009:1-27. [9]莫少群.“科学家的社会责任”问题的由来与发展[J].自然辩证法研究,2003(6):50-53. [10]约纳斯.技术、医学与伦理学——责任原理的实践[M].张荣,译,上海:上海译文出版社,2008. [11]贝克.风险社会[M].南京:译林出版社,2004. [12]黄小茹.ELSI 研究的进展与趋势[J].科学与社会,2012(1):56-68. [13]皮克林.作为实践和文化的科学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006. [14]MACKENZIE Donald,WAJCMAN Judy.The social shaping of technology[C].Philadelphia:Open University Press,1985. [15]PINCH Trevor J,BIJKER Wiebe E.The social construction of facts and artefacts:or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other[J].Social studies of science,1984,14:399-441. [16]俞可平.治理和善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000. [17]樊春良.科学与治理的兴起及其意义[J].科学学研究,2005(1):7-13. [18]仲崇山.“基因编辑婴儿”打开了潘多拉魔盒[N].新华日报,2018-11-28(15). [19]科技部.发展负责任的人工智能:新一代人工智能治理原则发布[EB/OL].(2019-06-17)[2019-08-14].http://www.most.gov.cn/kjbgz/201906/t20190617_147107.htm.
2020, 
