Evaluation on the Technological Innovation Activities of Volatile Organic Compounds(VOCs)Control Based on Patent Quality Indicators between China and the US
Qiu Honghua, Wang Bin
School of Intellectual Property,Northwest University,Xi'an 710127,China
Abstract：A comparative analysis of the patent quality of Volatile Organic Compounds(VOCs)control technology between China and the United States is made based on the patent information retrieval,which could provide valuable information support for the innovation activities and patent layout of VOCs control technology in China.Patent documents of VOCs control technology applied in both China and the United States were searched from INNOGRAPHY.A comparative study on the technological innovation and patent protection of VOCs control technology between China and the United States is made from patent quality indicators,such as the number of claims,lifespan of patent,the number of patent forward citations,patent strength and competitive position of patent assignees.It is found that,in the field of VOCs control technology,China has obvious advantages in patent quantity across the globe,however,in terms of patent quality,there is still a big gap compared with the United States,which directly reflects that the technological innovation capabilities in VOCs control technology in China need to be enhanced,the quality of patent document drafting needs to be strengthened,meanwhile,the patent quality also needs to be further improved.Finally,the development strategies for enhancing the innovation capabilities and competitiveness of Chinese VOCs control technology are suggested.
邱洪华, 王斌. 基于专利质量指标的中美挥发性有机物治理技术创新活动评价[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(5): 163-172.
Qiu Honghua, Wang Bin. Evaluation on the Technological Innovation Activities of Volatile Organic Compounds(VOCs)Control Based on Patent Quality Indicators between China and the US. , 2020(5): 163-172.
[1]NAGAOKA S,MOTOHASHI K,GOTO A.Patent statistics as an innovation indicator[M]//BRONWYN H H,NATHAN R.Handbook of the economics of innovation.Oxford:Elsevier,2010. [2]KÜRTÖSSY J.Innovation indicators derived from patent data[J].Social & management sciences,2004(12):91-101. [3]GRILICHES Z.Patent statistics as economic indicators:a survey[J].Journal of economic literature,1990,28(4):1661-1707. [4]柳剑平,郑绪涛.专利制度:对技术创新的激励作用及其优化[J].湖北行政学院学报,2008(1):58-60. [5]ABRAHAM B P,MOITRA S D.Innovation assessment through patent analysis[J].Technovation,2001,21(4):245-252. [6]徐迎,张薇.专利与技术创新的关系研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(19):75-80+68. [7]SCHERER F M,HARHOFF D.Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes[J].Research policy,2000,29(4-5):559-566. [8]BASBERG B L.Patents and the measurement of technological change:a survey of the literature[J].Research policy,1987,16(2-4):131-141. [9]HSIEH C H.Patent value assessment and commercialization strategy[J].Technological forecasting & social change,2013,80(2):307-319. [10]朱雪忠,万小丽.竞争力视角下的专利质量界定[J].知识产权,2009,19(4):7-14. [11]王海林,聂磊,李靖,等.重点行业挥发性有机物排放特征与评估分析[J].科学通报,2012,57(19):1739-1746. [12]李月.关于VOC的排放以及控制措施探讨[J].环境与发展,2018,30(9):65-66. [13]陈文严.工业VOC的危害分析以及治理技术研究[J].化工设计通讯,2018,44(4):188. [14]张云,李彦锋.环境中VOCs的污染现状及处理技术研究进展[J].化工环保,2009,29(5):411-415. [15]王晓琳,李剑.中国《专利法》下权利要求解释的规则与实践综述[J].专利代理,2015(3):99-104. [16]邱洪华,宋秋玉.中国专利价值影响因素的评价及其与美国的比较[J].创新,2018,12(2):87-98. [17]乔永忠,谭婉琳.专利权利要求数与维持时间关系实证研究——以中日授权专利数据为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017(2):79-88. [18]TONG X,FRAME J D.Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data[J].Research policy,1994,23(2):133-141. [19]乔永忠.专利维持年费机制研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(10):1490-1494. [20]朱雪忠,乔永忠,万小丽.基于维持时间的发明专利质量实证研究——以中国国家知识产权局1994年授权的发明专利为例[J].管理世界,2009(1):174-175. [21]任声策,尤建新.中国专利生存期:基于中国在美专利数据的实证[J].管理工程学报,2012,26(4):77-83. [22]INNOGRAPHY Inc.Configurable patent strength calculator:US2015/0331585A1[P]. 2015-11-19. [23]温芳芳.专利引文视阈下企业技术影响力的测度与比较——以“世界500强”汽车企业为例[J].情报杂志,2018(9):58-63. [24]刘桂锋,王秀红.基于专利地图的薄膜太阳能领域专利引证分析[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(14):197-201. [25]BREITZMAN A,THOMAS P.The emerging clusters model:a tool for identifying emerging technologies across multiple patent systems[J].Research policy,2015,44(1):195-205. [26]OECD.OECD patent statistics manual[M].Paris:OECD Publishing,2009. [27]INNOGRAPHY Inc.Patent strength:patent value[EB/OL].[2017-11-29].https://www.innography.com/whyinnography/patentstrength. [28]李琰,王玲玲,曹凤霞,等.中国石油炼化专利价值评估体系及应用研究——中国专利奖获奖专利价值评估[J].石油科技论坛,2017(1):16-22. [29]李钊,盛垚.基于层次分析法和大战略矩阵的企业专利战略研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(7):25-29. [30]QIU Hong hua,YANG Jing.An assessment of technological innovation capabilities of carbon capture and storage technology based on patent analysis:a comparative study between China and the United States[J],Sustainability,2018(3):1-20. [31]邱洪华,刘晓丽.中美4G移动通信技术专利信息比较研究[J].情报杂志,2013(8):81-86. [32]BLIND K,EDLER J,FRIETSCH R,et al.Motives to patent:empirical evidence from Germany[J].Research policy,2006,35(5):655-672. [33]NICOLA B,ROSA G,MAURIZIO S.To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations,incentives and obstacles to university patenting[J].Scientometrics,2007,70(2):333-354.
2020, 
