Abstract：For gene editing legislation,first of all,the legal limits of the research and application of this technology should be clarified.At present,about the legal limits of gene editing,there are three local theories including prohibition theory,part-allowed theory and permissible theory,and three legal practice models of extraterritorial countries including the Canadian-style prohibition model,the American-style partial permission model and the British-style examination approval model.The above-mentioned local theoretical views and overseas practice modes can not be adopted as the legal limits of gene editing alone.The reasonable legal limits of gene editing are as follows:allow and guarantee the freedom of basic research in gene editing,strive to avoid Canadian-style criminal penalties and American-style non-subsidy policies.When the technology is mature,germline gene editing for prevention,treatment purposes can be allowed,common gene enhancement as a species can also be accepted,but genetic enhancement of personality should be prohibited.
[1]习近平.提高防控能力着力防范化解重大风险 保持经济持续健康发展社会大局稳定[N].人民日报,2019-01-22 (1). [2]杨建军,李姝卉.CRISPR/Cas9人体基因编辑技术运用的法律规制——以基因编辑婴儿事件为例[J].河北法学,2019 (9):44-57. [3]朱晓峰.人类基因编辑研究自由的法律界限与责任[J].武汉大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2019 (4):21-31. [4]田野,刘霞.基因编辑的良法善治:在谦抑与开放之间[J].深圳大学学报 (人文社会科学版),2018 (4):106-115. [5]姚大志.基因干预:从道德哲学的观点看[J].法制与社会发展,2019 (4):154-166. [6]王凌皞.基因改造、人性与人类价值——辩护一种自然主义的 “人类改进”概念[J].华东政法大学学报,2019 (5):19-31. [7]颜厥安.鼠肝与虫臂的管制——法理学与生命伦理论文集[M].台北:台湾元照出版有限公司,2004. [8]XU L,WANG J,LIU Y,et al.CRISPR-edited stem cells in a patient with HIV and acute lymphocytic leukemia[J].The New England journal of medicine,2019 (381):1240-1247. [9]FELDMAN R C.The CRISPR revolution:what editing human DNA reveals about the patent system's DNA[J].Social science electronic publishing,2016,7 (30):1-22. [10]SPECTER M.The gene hackers[EB/OL]. (2015-11-8)[2019-3-17].https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/11/16/the-gene-hackers. [11]ASBURY B D.Counseling after CRISPR[J].21 STAN.TECH.L.REV,2018 (1):1-32. [12]HAMZELOU J.Exclusive:world's first baby born with new “3 parent”technique[EB/OL]. (2016-9-27)[2019-4-15].https://www.newscientist.com/article/2107219-exclusive-worlds-first-baby-born-with-new-3-parent-technique/. [13]LAKHANI C M,TIERNEY B T,MANRAI A K,et al.Repurposing large health insurance claims data to estimate genetic and environmental contributions in 560 phenotypes[J/OL].Nature genetics,2019,1 (14):327-334[2019-11-15].https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0313-7#additional-information. [14]ENRIQUEZ P.Genome editing and the jurisprudence of scientific empiricism[J].VAND.J.ENT.& TECH.L,2016 (4):603-695. [15]Organizing committee for the international summit on human gene editing:international summit statement[EB/OL]. (2015-12-3)[2019-11-15].http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12032015a. [16]Statement by the organizing committee of the second international summit on human genome editing[EB/OL]. (2018/11-29)[2019-11-15]. http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?recordid=11282018b. [17]罗伯特·阿列克西.法律论证理论[M].舒国滢,译,北京:中国法制出版社,2002. [18]吕克·费希.超人类革命[M].周行,译,长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2017. [19]E·博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004. [20]KNOPPERS B M,ISASI R,CAULFIELD T,et al.Human gene editing:revisiting Canadian policy[J].NPJ regenerative medicine,2017 (3):1-2. [21]Consolidated appropriations act,2019.Public law 116-6 116th Congress[EB/OL]. (2019-2-15)[2019-11-15].https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ6/PLAW-116publ6.pdf. [22]MOHAPATRA S.Politically correct eugenics[J].FIU law review,2017 (7):101-129. [23]HYUN I,WILKERSON A,JOHNSTON J.Embryology policy:revisit the 14-day rule[EB/OL]. (2016-5-4)[2019-4-18].https://www.nature.com/news/embryology-policy-revisit-the-14-day-rule-1.19838. [24]REARDON S.First CRISPR human clinical trial gets a green light from U.S.panel[EB/OL]. (2016-6-22)[2019-11-17].https://www.nature.com/news/first-crispr-clinical-trial-gets-green-light-from-us-panel-1.20137. [25]张迪,刘欢.线粒体置换技术的伦理学反思[J].中国医学伦理学,2018,31 (7):873-878. [26]The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine.Human genome editing:science,ethics,and governance[M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2017. [27]RASMUSSEN C.Canada's assisted human reproductive act:is it scientific censorship,or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies[J].Saskatchewan law review,2004 (67):97-135. [28]RAM N.Science as speech[J].Iowa law review,2017,102:1187-1237. [29]DEONANDAN R,RAHMAN T.Implications and reflections on the 2010 supreme court ruling on Canada's AHR act[J].International journal of women's health,2011 (3):405-408. [30]SHUKLA-JONES A,FRIEDRICHS S,WINICKOFF D E.Gene editing in an international context:scientific,economic and social issues across sectors[EB/OL]. (2018-04)[2019-11-19].http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/38a54acb-en. [31]PARADISE J U S.regulatory challenges for gene editing[J].SSRN electronic journal,2016 (7):1-8. [32]胡锦光,韩大元.中国宪法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004. [33]黄丁全.医疗、法律与生命伦理:上[M].北京:法律出版社,2015. [34]NORDBERG A,MINSSEN T,HOLM S,et al.Cutting edges and weaving threads in the gene editing revolution:reconciling scientific progress with legal,ethical,and social concerns[J].Journal of law and the biosciences,2018 (1):35-83. [35]郑泉,张增一.争议性科技议题中的公众参与[J].自然辩证法研究,2019 (4):53-58.
2020, 
