Motivation and Mechanism of Innovation Behavior Decision-Making in Scientific and Technological Enterprises ——Verification of Traceability and Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparison Analysis Based on Grounded Theory
Dong Jinjin, Chen Guanju
School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China
Abstract:Under the circumstance of Internet,the innovation behavior of enterprises has changed profoundly compared with the traditional situation.Taking five cases which selected from theoretical sampling as the basis of grounded theory coding,the paper constructs theoretical model of motivation and mechanism of enterprise innovation behavior decision.At the same time,by means of fuzzy sets qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA),the theoretical model is verified and developed for another ten enterprise cases.The resucts show that the six main categories of innovation intention,innovation direction,innovation behavior constraint,innovation implementation path,innovation system construction and innovation behavior type are the main influencing factors of decision-making motivation and mechanism of enterprise innovation behavior.Innovation intention is the fundamental driving factor of enterprise innovation behavior decision;Market and technical factors together guide the direction of enterprise innovation behavior;There are two combination configurations of antecedent condition variables in the decision-making motivation of enterprise innovation behavior and there are three types of motivation models in the decision-making of enterprise innovation behavior:active exploration,passive adaptation and shortcut.
董津津, 陈关聚. 科技型企业创新行为决策动因与机理——基于扎根理论的溯源与模糊集定性比较分析的验证[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(7): 111-119.
Dong Jinjin, Chen Guanju. Motivation and Mechanism of Innovation Behavior Decision-Making in Scientific and Technological Enterprises ——Verification of Traceability and Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparison Analysis Based on Grounded Theory. , 2020(7): 111-119.
[1]苗文龙,何德旭,周潮.企业创新行为差异与政府技术创新支出效应[J].经济研究,2019,54 (1):85-99. [2]桂黄宝.企业创新生态系统演化:iOS与Android案例回溯研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34 (16):76-82. [3]孔凡萍,贾永飞.山东省区域产业技术创新体系构建研究[J].中国科技论坛,2015 (1):108-112. [4]王金杰,郭树龙,张龙鹏.互联网对企业创新绩效的影响及其机制研究——基于开放式创新的解释[J].南开经济研究,2018 (6):170-190. [5]吴治国,石金涛.员工创新行为触发系统分析及管理启示[J].中国软科学,2007 (3):92-98. [6]AULAWI H,SUDIRMAN I,SURYADI K.Knowledge sharing behavior,antecedent and its influence towards the company's innovation capability[C].IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management.2009. [7]KETTINGER W J,LI Y,DAVIS J M.The roles of psychological climate,information management capabilities,and IT support on knowledge-sharing:an MOA perspective[J].European journal of information systems,2015,24 (1):59-75. [8]宁凌.不同体制下企业创新行为的理论分析与实证比较[J].华中农业大学学报 (社会科学版),2006 (6):64-69. [9]SHERALI H D.A multiple leader stackelberg model and analysis[J].Operations research,1984,32 (2):390-404. [10]NAKAMURA T.One-leader and multiple-follower Stackelberg games with private information[J].Economics letters,2015,127:27-30. [11]易余胤,盛昭瀚,肖条军.企业自主创新、模仿创新行为与市场结构的演化研究[J].管理工程学报,2005,19 (1):14-18. [12]刘哲,孙林岩,屈贤明等.基于企业创新与政府管制的市场结构演化[J].科学学研究,2007,25 (5):991-995. [13]吴忠涛,张琅,张裕华.经济转型时期的科技型企业创新效率比较研究[J].当代经济科学,2018,40 (3):57-65+126. [14]罗永泰,任洪源.滨海新区科技型企业创新驱动发展路径研究[J].天津师范大学学报 (社会科学版),2014 (4):47-51. [15]潘宏亮.资源聚合与深度交互耦合下科技型企业创新能力跃迁研究[J].河南师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2015,42 (5):41-46. [16]EISENHARDT K M.Building theories from case study research[J].Academy of management review,1989,14 (4):532-550. [17]GLASER B,STRAUSS A L.The discovery of grounded theory:strategies for qualitative research[J].Nursing research,1968,17 (4):377-380. [18]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017 (6):155-167. [19]伯努瓦·里豪克斯,查尔斯 C.拉金.QCA设计原理与应用:超越定性与定量研究的新方法[M].杜运周,李永发,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2017.