The Quantitative Evaluation of Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Services Policy
Guo Qiang1, Liu Dongmei2
1. Economics & Management College, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China; 2. Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development, Beijing 100038, China
Abstract：Agricultural and rural science & technology service policy is an important part of agricultural science & technology policy.It is the strategic support to improve the quality and efficiency of agricultural production and promote agricultural and rural modernization. This study summarizes agricultural science & technology services policies from 2012 to the present, constructs PMC Index Model with the help of ROSTCM tools and evaluates 10 key policies quantitatively.Through PMC score and PMC surface, we find that four of the ten policies are excellent, five are favorable, one is bad, the overall policies level are within an acceptable range, and the policy design is reasonable.Agricultural science & technology service policies continue to increase in fluctuations, and policy attention continues to increase.The policies issued by the technology sector have a high rating, and effective job grabbing is the guarantee of effective policy implementation.Based on this, the paper puts forward some suggestions, that is to construct a social service system for agricultural science & technology, to strengthen overall coordination between departments, to construct the grassroots policy implementation platform, to strengthen financial support for agricultural science & technology services.
郭强, 刘冬梅. 中国农业农村科技服务政策量化评价[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(8): 148-158.
Guo Qiang, Liu Dongmei. The Quantitative Evaluation of Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Services Policy. , 2020(8): 148-158.
[1]BAN A W, HAWKINS H S.Agricultural extension[M].London:Blackwell Science Ltd., 1996. [2]FARRINGTON J.Public sector agricultural extension:is there life after structural adjustment[M].London:ODI, 1994. [3]ROBERT P B.Acquiring and managing financial resources[C].Rome:FAO, 1997. [4]CARNEY R M, SAUNDERS R D, FREEDLAND K E, et al.Association of depression witk reduced heart rate variability in coronary artery disease[J].The American journal of cardiology, 1995, 76 (8):562-564. [5]LERMAN Z.Policies and institutions for commercialization of subsistence farms in transition countries[J].Journal of Asian economics, 2004, 15 (3):461-479. [6]WALLACE I.Agricultural education at the crossroads:present dilemmas and possible options for the future in Sub-Saharan Africa[J].International journal of educational development, 1997, 17 (1):27-39. [7]郭建强, 冯开文.农业科技成果转化基本模式比较[J].中国软科学, 2010 (S1):133-137. [8]毛学峰, 孔祥智.我国 “十一五”时期农业科技成果转化现状与对策[J].中国科技论坛, 2012 (6):126-132. [9]徐彬, 揭筱纹, 郑浩文.共生环境中的农业科技成果转化模式研究[J].农村经济, 2010 (11):91-95. [10]翟金良.中国农业科技成果转化的特点、存在的问题与发展对策[J].中国科学院院刊, 2015, 30 (3):378-375. [11]何传新.健全与完善农业科技推广体系路径选择[J].农业科研经济管理, 2013 (1):40-43. [12]黄季焜, 胡瑞法, 智华勇.基层农业技术推广体系30年发展与改革:政策评估和建议[J].农业技术经济, 2009 (1):4-11. [13]加里·D·利贝卡普.产权合同中的分配问题[M].上海:三联出版社, 1994. [14]吕燕.科技创新政策评估研究综述[J].科技进步与对策, 2012 (10):156-160. [15]彭纪生, 仲为国, 孙文祥.政策测量、政策协同演变与经济绩效:基于创新政策的实证研究[J].管理世界, 2008 (9):25-36. [16]毛世平, 杨艳丽, 林青宁.改革开放以来我国农业科技创新政策的演变及效果评价:来自我国农业科研机构的经验验证[J].农业经济问题, 2019 (1):73-85. [17]张永安, 马昱域.基于熵权TOPSIS法的区域技术创新政策评价研究[J].科技管理研究, 2017 (6):92-97. [18]赵立香, 汤静.中国碳减排政策的量化评价[J].中国科技论坛, 2018 (1):116-122. [19]张永安, 耿喆.我国区域科技创新政策的量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技管理研究, 2015 (14):26-31.
2020, 
