创新路径、技术密度与制造业国际竞争力之间的关系——基于17个行业的实证研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (937 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本文以中国制造业2007—2017年的面板数据为基础,研究自主研发、协同创新和非研发创新三种创新路径对制造业国际竞争力的影响,并引入交互项分析技术密度在两者影响关系中的调节作用。研究发现:自主研发对制造业国际竞争力产生显著的促进作用,同时高技术制造业与自主研发的交互作用对制造业竞争力的提升优于中低技术制造业;协同创新路径对国际竞争力产生负面影响,但中低技术制造业对协同创新与竞争力间关系的刺激作用更强;非研发创新对制造业国际竞争力产生负面影响,技术密度越高对非研发创新与竞争力间关系的刺激作用越强。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘兰剑
	王晓琦

关键词 ：自主研发, 协同创新, 非研发创新, 创新路径, 国际竞争力

Abstract：Based on the panel data of Chinas manufacturing industry from 2007 to 2017, this paper studies the impact of three innovation paths of independent research, collaborative innovation and non-research innovation on the international competitiveness of the manufacturing industry, and introduces interactive items to analyze the moderating role of technical density in the relationship between the two.The results show that independent research and development has significantly promoted the international competitiveness of the manufacturing industry.At the same time, the interaction between high-tech manufacturing and independent research and development has improved the competitiveness of manufacturing industries better than low and medium-tech manufacturing industries;The collaborative innovation path has a negative impact on international competitiveness.However, the low and medium-tech manufacturing industry has a stronger stimulating effect on the relationship between collaborative innovation and competitiveness;Non-research innovation has a negative impact on the international competitiveness of the manufacturing industry, but the higher the technology densityis, the stronger the stimulus for non-research innovation and competitiveness becomes.

Key words： Independent research Cooperative innovation Non-research innovation Innovation path International competitiveness

收稿日期: 2020-02-10

PACS:

C93

基金资助:国家社科基金项目“面向‘一带一路’产能合作的新能源汽车国际贸易网络研究”(19BJY072),陕西省软科学研究计划重点项目“陕西省科技‘三评’改革研究”(2020KRZ012),中央高校基金项目“国内外科技政策与科技评价比较研究”(300102118604),战略型新兴产业技术水平国际比较研究(300102119611)。

作者简介: 刘兰剑(1974-),男,陕西淳化人,博士、教授、硕士生导师;研究方向:科技政策与管理。

引用本文:

刘兰剑, 王晓琦. 创新路径、技术密度与制造业国际竞争力之间的关系——基于17个行业的实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(10): 114-121.
Liu Lanjian, Wang Xiaoqi. Relationship Between Innovation Path, Technology Density and Manufacturing International Competitiveness ——Based on Empirical Research in 17 Industries. , 2020(10): 114-121.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2020/I10/114

[1] FABIO M,FRANCESCO R.The impact of technology and structural change on export performance on nine developing countries[J].Economics and quantitative methods,2002,33(4):527-547.
[2] 封伟毅,李建华,赵树宽.技术创新对高技术产业竞争力的影响——基于中国1995—2010年数据的实证分析[J].中国软科学,2012(9):154-164.
[3] [3]GORDON I.Internationalisation and urban competition[J].Urban studies,1999,36(5/6):1001-1016.
[4] 金碚.产业国际竞争力研究[J].经济研究,1996(11):39-44+59
[5] 侯建,陈恒.外部知识源化、非研发创新与专利产出——以高技术产业为例[J].科学学研究,2017,35(3):447-458.
[6] VEGAJURADO J,GUTIéRREZGRACIA A,FERNáNDEZDELUCIO I.Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry[J].Industrial & corporate change,2009,18(4):637-670.
[7] HEMPHILL T A.Open initiative:the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[J].Academy of management executive,2005,19(1):164-165.
[8] MONTMARTIN B,HERRERA M.Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives:empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models[J].Research policy,2015,44(5):1065-1079.
[9] 储德银.自主研发、技术引进与高新技术产业成长[J].科研管理,2013,34(11):53-60+113.
[10] HAGEDOORN J,WANG N.Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies[J].Research policy,2012,41(6):1072-1083.
[11] 刘磊,刘晓宁.自主研发、技术引进与制造业国内技术含量[J].科研管理,2018,39(8):34-42.
[12] [12]DENICOLAI S,RAMIREZ M,TIDD J.Overcoming the false dichotomy between internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition:absorptive capacity dynamics over time[J].Technological forecasting & social change,2016,104(3):57-65.
[13] 陈恒,侯建,陈伟.内外部知识源化、非研发对创新绩效影响的空间计量研究——以高技术产业为例[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(8):60-69.
[14] 吴延兵.自主研发、技术引进与生产率——基于中国地区工业的实证研究[J].经济研究,2008(8):51-64.
[15] 李光泗,沈坤荣.技术能力、技术进步路径与创新绩效研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(3):1-6.
[16] ZHOU K Z,FANG W U.Technological capability,strategic flexibility,and product innovation[J].Strategic management journal,2010,31(5):547-561.
[17] 甄珍,白俊红,陈建勋.内部研发、外源性研发与企业竞争优势——以沪深高科技上市公司为样本的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(19):78-82.
[18] 黄群慧,贺俊.中国制造业的核心能力、功能定位与发展战略——兼评《中国制造2025》[J].中国工业经济,2015(6):5-17.
[19] RADAUER A,JüRGEN S.Low-tech,innovation and state aid:the Austrian case[J].International entrepreneurship and management Journal,2007,3(3):247-261.
[20] 杨仁发,汪青青.生产性服务投入、技术创新与制造业国际竞争力[J].山西财经大学学报,2018,40(9):62-75.
[21] ZHANG K H.How does foreign direct investment affect industrial competitiveness? Evidence from China[J].China economic review,2014,30:530-539.
[22] 于明远,范爱军.人口红利与中国制造业国际竞争力[J].经济与管理研究,2016,37(2):3-11.
[23] 戴翔.中国制造业国际竞争力——基于贸易附加值的测算[J].中国工业经济,2015(1):78-88.
[24] 周材荣.FDI、产业聚集是否有助于国际竞争力提升——基于中国制造业PVAR模型的实证研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2016(10):56-69.
[25] 文玉春.产业创新的路径选择:自主研发、协同创新或技术引进[J].山西财经大学学报,2017,39(2):47-57.
[26] 李子彪,孙可远,赵菁菁.研发创新、非研发创新对创新绩效影响的差异化——基于高新技术企业的实证研究[J].技术经济,2017,36(11):7-15.
[27] 许和连,成丽红,孙天阳.制造业投入服务化对企业出口国内增加值的提升效应——基于中国制造业微观企业的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2017(10):62-80.
[28] 蒋开东,俞立平,霍妍.企业自主研发与协同创新绩效比较研究——基于面板数据与非期望产出效率的分析[J].软科学,2015,29(2):68-71.