知识产权制度距离对中国企业跨国技术并购的影响分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (1)

全文: PDF (6780 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本文以制度理论为基础,通过对2005—2018年中国企业实施的249起跨国技术并购事件的分析,深入探讨知识产权制度距离对跨国技术并购持续时间、股权选择的影响。研究发现:①知识产权制度距离与并购持续时间呈倒U型关系,即随着知识产权制度距离的增大,并购持续时间先延长后缩短;②知识产权制度距离与并购股权比例呈U型关系,即在知识产权制度相似和相异程度较大的东道国,中国企业通常会选择高股权并购模式。本研究丰富了制度距离和企业跨国并购的相关研究,识别出知识产权制度距离影响中国企业跨国技术并购过程的拐点。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	阎海峰
	王墨林
	苏聪

关键词 ：知识产权制度距离, 跨国技术并购, 持续时间, 股权选择

Abstract：Based on the 249 cross-border technology acquisitions undertaken by Chinese firms from 2005—2018,this study,drawing on institutional theory,examines the impact of intellectual property rights institutional(IPRI)distance on the completion duration and equity choice of cross-border technology acquisitions.The results reveal that:①There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between IPRI distance and the completion duration of M&A,in other words,with an increase in IPRI distance,the completion duration of M&A increases firstly and then decreases;②There is a U-shaped relationship between IPRI distance and the equity ratio of M&A,in other words,in host countries with very similar or different levels of intellectual property institutions,Chinese firms are more likely to choose high-equity acquisitions.This study enriches the research on institutional distance and cross-border M&A,and uncovers the turning point of IPRI distance affecting the cross-border technology acquisitions of Chinese firms.

Key words： IPRI distance Cross-border technology acquisition Completion duration Equity choice

收稿日期: 2020-05-11

PACS:

F279.23

基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目“优势还是劣势？母国专有优势对中国企业海外合法性影响研究”(71972072),上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“后发企业通过跨国并购提升自主创新能力的匹配研究”(2018BGL028)。

通讯作者: 王墨林

作者简介: 阎海峰(1969-),男,山东招远人,管理学博士,华东理工大学商学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为企业国际化。

引用本文:

阎海峰, 王墨林, 苏聪. 知识产权制度距离对中国企业跨国技术并购的影响分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(3): 123-132.
Yan Haifeng, Wang Molin, Su Cong. Impact of Intellectual Property Rights Institutional Distance on Chinese Cross-Border Technology Acquisitions. , 2021(3): 123-132.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2021/I3/123

[1]石丽静,洪俊杰.知识产权保护如何影响企业国际化——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].国际贸易问题,2019(11):146-158.
[2]秦倩,马治国.中美经贸摩擦背景下中国区域知识产权保护升级制度保障的实证研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020(2):99-109.
[3]吴冰,阎海峰,杜子琳.外来者劣势:理论拓展与实证分析[J].管理世界,2018,34(6):110-126+187-188.
[4]HASAN I,KHALIL F,SUN X.The impacts of intellectual property rights protection on cross-border M&As[J].Quarterly journal of finance,2017,7(3):1-38.
[5]ALIMOV A,OFFICER M S.Intellectual property rights and cross-border mergers and acquisitions[J].Journal of corporate finance,2017,45(4):360-377.
[6]AHAMMAD M F,KONWAR Z,PAPAGEORGIADIS N,et al.R&D capabilities,intellectual property strength and choice of equity ownership in cross-border acquisitions:evidence from BRICS acquirers in Europe[J].R&D management,2018,48(2):177-194.
[7]刘煜,王疆.知识产权保护强度、知识距离与跨国并购股权选择[J].投资研究,2019,38(2):4-13.
[8]NORTH D C.Institutions,institutional change and economic performance[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
[9]XU D,SHENKAR O.Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise[J].Academy of management review,2002,27(4):608-618.
[10]KOSTOVA T,ZAHEER S.Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity:the case of the multinational enterprise[J].Academy of management review,1999,24(1):64-81.
[11]MCCARTHY K J,AALBERS H L.Technological acquisitions:the impact of geography on post-acquisition innovative performance[J].Research policy,2016,45(9):1818-1832.
[12]BOONE A L,MULHERIN J H.How are firms sold[J].Journal of finance,2007,62(2):847-875.
[13]ZHU H,XIA J,MAKINO S.How do high-technology firms create value in international M&A? Integration,autonomy and cross-border contingencies[J].Journal of world business,2015,50(4):718-728.
[14]ELANGO B,LAHIRI S,KUNDU S K.How does firm experience and institutional distance impact ownership choice in high-technology acquisitions[J].R&D management,2013,43(5):501-516.
[15]MEYER C B,ALTENBORG E.Incompatible strategies in international mergers:the failed merger between telia and telenor[J].Journal of international business studies,2008,39(3):508-525.
[16]PAPAGEORGIADIS N,CROSS A R,ALEXIOU C.International patent systems strength 1998-2011[J].Journal of world business,2014,49(4):586-597.
[17]HAGEDOORN J,CLOODT D,VAN KRANENBURG H.Intellectual property rights and the governance of international R&D partnerships[J].Journal of international business studies,2005,36(2):175-176.
[18]JOHANSON J,VAHLNE J E.The internationalization process of the firm——a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments[J].Journal of international business studies,1977,8(1):25-34.
[19]DIKOVA D,SAHIB P R,VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN A.Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion:the effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry,1981-2001[J].Journal of international business studies,2010,41(2):223-245.
[20]SUCHMAN M C.Managing legitimacy:strategic and institutional approaches[J].Academy of management review,1995,20(3):571-610.
[21]GREENWOOD R,HININGS C R.Understanding strategic change:the contribution of archetypes[J].Academy of management journal,1993,36(5):1052-1081.
[22]GREENWOOD R,HININGS C R.Understanding radical organizational change:bringing together the old and the new institutionalism[J].Academy of management review,1996,21(4):1022-1054.
[23]KOGUT B,ZANDER U.Did socialism fail to innovate? A natural experiment of the two zeiss companies[J].American sociological review,2000,65(2):169-190.
[24]KHOURY T A,CUERVO-CAZURRA A,DAU L A.Institutional outsiders and insiders:the response of foreign and domestic inventors to the quality of intellectual property rights protection[J].Global strategy journal,2014,4(3):200-220.
[25]HEIKKILA T,GERLAK A K.Building a conceptual approach to collective learning:lessons for public policy scholars[J].Policy studies Journal,2013,41(3):484-512.
[26]GERRNWOOD R,SUDDABY R.Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields:the big five accounting firms[J].Academy of management journal,2006,49(1):27-48.
[27]YADONG L,TUNG R L.International expansion of emerging market enterprises:a springboard perspective[J].Journal of international business studies,2007,38(4):481-498.
[28]CUI L,MEYER K E,HU H W.What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms[J].Journal of world business,2014,49(4):488-501.
[29]贾镜渝,李文.距离、战略动机与中国企业跨国并购成败——基于制度和跳板理论[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(6):122-132.
[30]PAPAGEORGIADIS N,XU Y,ALEXIOU C.The effect of European intellectual property institutions on Chinese outward foreign direct investment[J].Management and organization review,2019,15(1):81-110.
[31]SZULANSKI G.Exploring internal stickiness:impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J].Strategic management journal,1996,17(S2):27-43.
[32]GUADALUPE M,KUZMINA O,THOMAS C.Innovation and foreign ownership[J].American economic review,2012,102(7):3594-3627.
[33]PARK W G.International patent protection:1960-2005[J].Research policy,2008,37(4):761-766.
[34]LAHIRI S,ELANGO B,KUNDU S K.Cross-border acquisition in services:Comparing ownership choice of developed and emerging economy mnes in India[J].Journal of world business,2014,49(3):409-420.
[35]HOFSTEDE G,HOFSTEDE G J,MINKOV M.Cultures and organizations:software of the mind[M].New York:McGraw Hill Professional,2010.
[36]KOGUT B,SINGH H.The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode[J].Journal of international business studies,1988,19(3):411-432.
[37]HAANS R F J,PIETERS C,HE Z L.Thinking about U:theorizing and testing U-and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research[J].Strategic management journal,2016,37(7):1177-1195.
[38]DENG X,KANG J-K,LOW B S.Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization:evidence from mergers[J].Journal of financial economics,2013,110(1):87-109.