Organizational Ambidexterity,Asset Allocation and Innovation Performance——Based on a Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Chen Hong1, Liu Xia1, Liu Dongxia1, Li Guangrong2
1. School of Management Science and Engineering,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,China; 2. School of Economics and Management,North University of China,Taiyuan 030051,China
Abstract：This research focuses on the impact of the combined dimension of ambidexterity (CD)and the balance dimension of ambidexterity (BD)on enterprise innovation performance and the difference in the enterprise asset allocation required for their implementation.Based on the sample data of listed companies in the electronic components manufacturing industry on GEM from 2014 to 2018,this paper uses a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to discuss the impact of complementary assets and organizational ambidexterity and their combination on enterprise innovation performance.The results show that BD and CD can achieve high innovation performance through a certain path all,but the implementation scenarios are different.To be specific,BD appears more frequently in small-scale enterprises,which needs to allocate abundant market complementary assets and human complementary assets.CD appears more frequently in large-scale enterprises and has higher requirements on enterprises,which not only need abundant complementary assets of market and human resources,but also need abundant manufacturing complementary assets.This paper provides reference for companies in the electronic components manufacturing industry with different sizes to choose appropriate innovation strategy according to their own resource base.
[1]胡超颖,金中坤.探索式创新、利用式创新与企业绩效关系的元分析[J].企业经济,2017,36 (5):79-85. [2]CAO Q,GEDAJIOVLC E,ZHANG H.Unpacking organizational ambidexterity:dimensions,contingencies and synergistic effects[J].Organization science,2009,20 (4):781-796. [3]张镒,刘人怀,陈海权.互补性视角下互联网平台企业创新机制研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (7):132-140. [4]张镒,刘人怀.互补性资产、平台领导力对双元创新的影响——基于环境复杂性的调节作用[J].管理评论,2020,32 (10):158-169. [5]高孟立.双元学习与服务创新绩效关系的实证研究——组织冗余与战略柔性的调节作用[J].科技管理研究,2017,37 (14):202-212. [6]白景坤,王健.双元学习的平衡效应和交互效应与企业创新绩效[J].财经问题研究,2016 (9):94-100. [7]肖丁丁,朱桂龙.跨界搜寻、双元能力结构与绩效的关系研究——基于创新能力结构视角[J].经济管理,2017,39 (3):48-62. [8]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017 (6):155-167. [9]PAOLO A,SANTI F,SEFAN H.Business model configurations and performance:a qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One Racing,2005-2013[J].Industrial & corporate change,2015,24 (3):655-676. [10]何洁,王冬冬,张浩. 战略型领导影响企业双元创新的实证分析[J].中国人力资源开发,2016 (7):75-82. [11]GSCHWANTNER S,HIEBL M R W.Management control systems and organizational ambidexterity[J].Journal of management control,2016,27 (4):1-34. [12]李国强,孙遇春,胡文安,等.企业网络能力对双元创新的影响机制——企业间网络位置跃迁视角[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36 (13):81-88. [13]BAUMJ A C,CALABRESE T,SILVERMAN B S.Don’t go it alone:alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology[J].Strategic management journal,2015,21 (3):267-294. [14]林筠,高霞,张敏.利用性与探索性创新对知识型企业创新绩效的双元驱动[J].软科学,2016,30 (5):59-63. [15]吴航,陈劲.国际化双元影响创新绩效的中介机制研究:知识整合视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39 (2):52-60. [16]吴航,陈劲.企业实施国际化双元战略的创新效应——以竞争强度为调节[J].科学学研究,2018,36 (2):334-341. [17]HUNT S D,LAMBE C J,WITTMANN C M.A theory and model of business alliance success[J].Journal of relationship marketing,2002,1 (1):17-35. [18]TAYLOR P,LOWER J.Are functional assets or knowledge assets the basis of new product development performance[J].Technology analysis & strategic management,1997,9 (4):473-488. [19]CHENG C F,CHANG M L,LI C S.Configural paths to successful product innovation[J].Journal of business research,2013,66 (12):2561-2573. [20]张素平,许庆瑞,张军.能力演进中核心技术与互补资产协同机理研究[J].科研管理,2014,35 (11):51-59. [21]王文华,孙杨,卢锐,等.技术资产水平、互补资产与企业绩效——基于生物制药行业上市公司的实证研究[J].华东经济管理,2017,31 (6):119-124. [22]游博,龙勇.技术集成能力对模块创新绩效的影响及相关调节效应分析[J].软科学,2016,30 (5):45-49. [23]何郁冰,周慧,丁佳敏.技术多元化如何影响企业的持续创新?[J].科学学研究,2017,35 (12):1896-1909. [24]田立法.企业人力资本资源前沿研究评述与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2014,36 (8):33-44. [25]DELGADO-VERDE M,MARTIN-DE CASTRO G,AMORES-SALVADO J.Intellectual capital and radical innovation:exploring the quadratic effects in technology-based manufacturing firms[J].Technovation,2016,54 (1):35-47. [26]HERSTAD S J,SANDVEN T,EBERSBERGER B.Recruitment,knowledge integration and modes of innovation[J].Research policy,2015,44 (1):138-153. [27]亢秀秋,沈颂东,房建奇.探索式与利用式创新研究的热点与前沿——可视化研究[J].技术经济,2019,38 (1):63-80. [28]SMITH W K.Top management team approaches to simultaneously managing exploration and exploitation[J].Academy of management best conference paper proceedings,2006 (1):D1-D6. [29]陈红,张玉,刘东霞.政府补助、税收优惠与企业创新绩效——不同生命周期阶段的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2019,22 (3):187-200. [30]李梅,余天骄.研发国际化是否促进了企业创新——基于中国信息技术企业的经验研究[J].管理世界,2016 (11):125-140. [31]罗彪,葛佳佳,王琼.探索型、利用型战略选择对组织绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2014,11 (1):37-45. [32]贾军,张卓.技术多元化、互补资产与企业绩效[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24 (6):64-72. [33]吴绍玉,汪波,李晓燕,等.双重社会网络嵌入对海归创业企业技术创新绩效的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016 (10):96-106. [34]刘伟,谢龙燕.技术轨道对创业板上市企业董事会结构的影响分析[J].中国科技论坛,2014 (1):101-107. [35]赵文,李月娇,赵会会.政府研发补贴有助于企业创新效率提升吗?——基于模糊集定性比较分析 (fsQCA)的研究[J].研究与发展管理,2020,32 (2):37-47.
2021, 
