Abstract：Artificial intelligence technology in the field of patent invention creation is a kind of bionic algorithmic program,which imitates human intelligence through its own cognitive computing system,so that the system has the ability to think innovatively like human beings to carry out invention creation activities.In the process of invention and creation,artificial intelligence may involve the implementation of others' patents in order to meet the needs of technical functions,and may also generate inventions that are not substantially different from others' patents,leading to the potential risk of infringement of others' patents.Although the patent infringement in the process of artificial intelligence invention and creation presents the characteristics of multi-agent and multi-step of divided infringement,it seems that there are legal obstacles to apply direct infringement or indirect infringement rules to determine the infringement,but in essence,it directly infringes the interests of the patentee.It is suggested to introduce the control and command rule as a supplement to the full coverage principle to become an important basis for the determination of patent infringement in artificial intelligence invention and creation.It determines that an actual infringer is liable for direct patent infringement by judging whether an independent infringer controls or directs other subjects between the parties.In the era of weak artificial intelligence,artificial intelligence is not completely separated from the control of human subjects,and from the perspective of safeguarding the safety of technological development,it is best solution for the owner of artificial intelligence to bear the liability of patent infringement.
[1]吴汉东,张平,张晓津.人工智能对知识产权法律保护的挑战[J].中国法律评论,2018 (2):1-24. [2]吴汉东.人工智能生成发明的专利法之问[J].当代法学,2019 (4):25-38. [3]李宗辉.人工智能生成发明专利授权之正当性探析[J].电子知识产权,2019 (1):12-21. [4]杨延超.人工智能对知识产权法的挑战[J].治理研究,2018,34 (5):120-128. [5]HASTIE T,TIBSHIRANI R,FRIEDMAN J.The elements of statistical learning:data mining,inference and prediction[M].New York:Springer Science and Bussiness Media,LLC.,2001. [6]林立洲,王景.人工智能对专利制度的影响研究[J].科技和产业,2020,20 (2):156-160. [7]刘强,马欢军.人工智能专利侵权问题研究[J].福建江夏学院学报,2018 (4):10-21. [8]WATSON B.A mind of its own——direct infringement by users of artificial intelligence systems[J].The journal of the franklin pierce center for intellectual property,2017,58 (1):72-73. [9]吴汉东.知识产权总论:第3版[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013. [10]陈明涛.云计算技术条件下专利侵权责任分析[J].知识产权,2017 (3):50-59. [11]任军民.中国专利权权利用尽原则的理论体系[J].法学研究,2006 (6):39-52. [12]HATTENBACH B,GLUCOFT J.Patents in an era of infinite monkeys and artificial intelligence[J].Stanford technology law review,2015 (19):32-36. [13]周鑫.人工智能自主发明对中国专利制度的冲击与应对[J].贵州省党校学报,2019 (4):90-96. [14]吴汉东.人工智能时代的制度安排与法律规制[J].法律科学 (西北政法大学学报),2017 (5):128-136. [15]朱雪忠,张广伟.人工智能产生的技术成果可专利性及其权利归属研究[J].情报杂志,2018 (2):69-75. [16]刘强.技术网络化背景下的专利侵权判定——以云计算技术专利权为视角[J].北方法学,2014 (2):59-60. [17]SCHAAL E J.Infringing a fantasy:future obstacles arise for the United States patent office and software manufacturers utilizing artificial intelligence[J].Villanova sports & entertainment law journal,2004 (1):173-202. [18]曹建峰,祝林华.人工智能对专利制度的影响初探[J].中国发明与专利,2018,15 (6):53-57. [19]何怀文.方法专利引诱侵权研究——兼评美国联邦巡回上诉法院Akamai Technologies,Inc.v.Limelight Networks,Inc.案全席判决[J].知识产权,2013 (3):89-94. [20]宋戈.方法专利分离式侵权的判定——以 “西电捷通案”为视角[J].电子知识产权,2018 (11):67-77. [21]孜里米拉·艾尼瓦尔,姚叶.人工智能技术对专利制度的挑战与应对[J].电子知识产权,2020 (4):52-61. [22]ABBOTT R .I think,therefore I invent:creative computers and the future of patent law[J].Boston college law review,2016,57 (4):1079-1126. [23]LORENZEN J.Avoiding the issue:limelight networks,Inc.v.akamai techs.Inc.[J].Depaul journal of art,technology & intellectual property law,2014,25 (1):183-183. [24]HORNSBY A.Divided infringement for software patents in view of limelight networks v.akamai technologies[J].Landslide,2014 (2):46-49. [25]DAVIES C R.An evolution step in intellectual property rights-artificial intelligence and intellectual property[J].Computer law & security review,2011 (27):601-619. [26]刘鑫.人工智能生成技术方案的专利法规制——理论争议、实践难题与法律对策[J].法律科学 (西北政法大学学报),2019,37 (5):82-92. [27]司晓,曹建峰.论人工智能的民事责任:以自动驾驶汽车和智能机器人为切入点[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报).2017,35(5):166-173. [28]徐小奔.人工智能 “创作”的人格要素[J].求索,2019 (6):95-102. [29]钱思雯.弱人工智能时代的法律回应——构建以产品责任为核心的责任分配体系[J].中国科技论坛,2019 (9):78-80.
2021, 
