Abstract：With the increasing use of wearable devices in daily life, it has greatly improve the quality of user training and recovery, but also bring some privacy risks.At the legislative and judicial levels, the data collected by the device should be classified and protected to a corresponding degree.In other words, the physiological data collected by wearable devices belongs to privacy and personal information.The personally identifiable information belongs to personal information only, and the data around users is neither private nor personal information.When exploring the current regulatory mode for data collected by wearable devices in China, it should be noted that the United States and the European Union have adopted decentralized and unified legislative models relatively, but both of them have certain limitations in reference to China's experience.The underlying reason is that the law needs to strike a balance between the protection of user privacy and the use of such data for scientific research purposes.At the present stage, we should adopt necessary regulations and guidance for the use of data collected by wearable devices.Specifically, it includes clarifying the legitimacy of the protection of personal information rights, determining a personal information collection model with multiple interests in balance, creating exceptions for the use of personal information for scientific research purposes, improving policy regulations of wearable devices and strengthening the self-discipline management of the industry.
毕文轩. 论对可穿戴设备收集数据的法律定性及保护路径[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(5): 156-167.
Bi Wenxuan. On the Legal Characterization and Protection Path of Data Collected by Wearable Devices. , 2021(5): 156-167.
[1]Collective Bargaining Agreement (2017)[EB/OL]. (2017-12-06).https://cosmic-s3.imgix.net/3c7a0a50-8e11-11e9-875d-3d44e94ae33f-2017-NBA-NBPA-Collective-Bargaining-Agreement.pdf. [2]LEE B.Best wearable tech,smartwatches,activity trackers and fitness gadgets[EB/OL]. (2017-12-06).https://www.forbes.com/sites/leebelltech/2017/12/06/best-wearable-tech-health-fitness-gadgets-2017-updated/#24c89eb85870. [3]HENRY W.A brief history of wearable tech[EB/OL]. (2015-05-06)[2020-02-21].https://www.wareable.com/wearable-tech/a-brief-history-of-wearables. [4]MARK M.The Nike experiment:how the shoe giant unleased the power of personal metrics[EB/OL]. (2009-07-22)[2020-03-14].https://www.wired.com/2009/06/lbnp-nike/. [5]何晓琳.健康医疗可穿戴设备数据隐私相关问题研究.中国医院管理,2017 (10):68-70. [6]JASON F A.Wearable technologies in collegiate sports:the ethics of collecting biometric data from student-athletes.The American journal of bioethics,2017 (17):67-70. [7]张莉.个人信息权的法哲学论纲.河北法学,2010 (2):136-139. [8]马特.个人资料保护之辩.苏州大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2012 (6):76-84. [9]刘德良.个人信息的财产权保护.法学研究,2007 (3):80-91. [10]任龙龙.个人信息民法保护的理论基础.河北法学,2017 (4):181-192. [11]谢青.日本的个人信息保护法制及启示.政治与法律,2006 (6):152-157. [12]叶名怡.个人信息的侵权法保护.法学研究,2018 (4):83-102. [13]王利明.隐私权概念的再界定.法学家,2012 (1):108-120+178. [14]BAMBAUER Y J.The new intrusion.Notre dame law review,2012 (88):205-276. [15]GOLA,SCHOMERUS.Bundesdatenschutzgesetz:BDSG,kommentar.München:Beck C.H.,2019:9. [16]王利明.论个人信息权在人格权法中的地位.苏州大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2012 (6):68-75+199-200. [17]张新宝.从隐私到个人信息:利益再衡量的理论与制度安排.中国法学,2015 (3):38-59. [18]ADAM C B.The right to privacy[M].Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press,1970:1. [19]齐爱民.拯救信息社会中的人格:个人信息保护法总论.北京:北京大学出版社,2009:78-79. [20]王利明.论个人信息权的法律保护——以个人信息权与隐私权的界分为中心.现代法学,2013 (4):62-72. [21]WARREN S D,BRANDEIS L D.The right to privacy.Harvard law review,1890 (4):193-220. [22]TUTAJ J A.Intrusion upon seclusion:bringing an “otherwise” valid cause of action into the 21st century.Marquette law review,1999 (82):665. [23]PEUVACILLA.The privacy torts. (2000-12-19)[2020-04-23].http://www.privacilla.org/business/privacytorts.html. [24]Restatement (second)of torts §652B. (2020-10-01)[2020-10-13].https://1.next.westlaw.com/Document/I82cb9f16dc1611e2ac56d4437d510c12/View/FullText.html?transitionType=UniqueDocItem&contextData= (sc.Default)&userEnteredCitation=RESTATEMENT+ (SECOND)+OF+TORTS+s+652B. [25]TUTAJ J A.Intrusion upon seclusion:bringing an “otherwise” valid cause of action into the 21st century.Marquette law review,1999 (82):666. [26]PROSSER W L.Privacy.California law review,1960 (48):383-423. [27]PETA v.Bobby Berosini,Ltd.,Case No:895 P.2d 1269,1279 (Nev.1995). (1995-05-22)[2020-10-13].https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1265645/peta-v-bobby-berosini-ltd/. [28]Miller v.Nat'l Broad.Co.,232 Cal.Rptr.668 (Cal.App.2 Dist.1986). (1995-05-22)[2020-10-13].https://www.lawpipe.com/California/Miller_v_National_Broadcasting_Co.html. [29]周汉华.个人信息保护法 (专家建议稿)及立法研究报告.北京:法律出版社,2006:79-80. [30]European Union (EU).Charter of fundamental rights of the European union.International legal materials,2001 (2):266-276. [31]MONTGOMERY K.Health wearable devices in the big data era:ensuring privacy,security,and consumer protection. (2017-05-21)[2020-10-13].https://www.democraticmedia.org/CDD-Wearable-Devices-Big-Data-Report. [32]IAN A,ROBERT G.Filling gaps in incomplete contracts:an economic theory of default rules.Yale law journal,1989 (1):87. [33]ELENI K.Consent in European data protection law.Amsterdam:Elsevier,2013:188-189. [34]人民网.浙江破获特大侵犯公民个人信息案. (2018-11-13)[2020-11-20].http://bj.people.com.cn/n2/2018/1113/c233086-32276466.html. [35]国务院办公厅.国务院办公厅关于促进和规范健康医疗大数据应用发展的指导意见. (2017-01-06).http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content_5088769.htm. [36]张荣顺.中华人民共和国民法总则解读.北京:中国法制出版社,2017:363. [37]杨芳.个人信息自决权理论及其检讨.比较法研究,2015 (6):29. [38]VENOOK J.The upcoming privacy battle over wearables in the NBA. (2017-04-17)[2020-05-14].https://www.theatlantic.com/ business/archive/2017/04/biometric-tracking-sports/522222. [39]ALAN S.NFL's flawed concussion research and ties to tobacco industry. (2016-05-24)[2020-05-12].https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/25/sports/football/nfl-concussion-research-tobacco.html.
2021, 
