Abstract：This article uses the annual reports of China's A-share listed companies and Chinese government work report from 2010 to 2019,and uses machine learning methods to measure the company's policy attention.On this basis,using of the financial data and patent data of the company we have empirically tested the impact and the transmission mechanism of policy attention on innovation.The results are as follows.①The policy attention of enterprises has a positive effect on the improvement of government subsidies,tax preferences and financing constraints they received,and this effect has a certain lag;②Direct subsidies and tax refunds in government funding have positive impact on innovation behavior;③Direct subsidies stimulate corporate innovation in the current year and one year after the lag,while tax rebates only stimulate innovation in one year after the lag.This article provides a new perspective and measurement method for measuring the guiding effect of policies on enterprises,and provides an important basis for more reasonable evaluation of the effects of Chinese policies.
傅利平, 高歌. 政策关注度与企业创新——基于政府资助的传导机制[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(6): 19-27.
Fu Liping, Gao Ge. Policy Attention and Enterprise Innovation——A Transmission Mechanism Based on Government Funding. , 2021(6): 19-27.
[1]赵晶,李林鹏,和雅娴.群团改革对企业创新的影响[J].管理世界,2019,35 (12):152-163+189. [2]LEE C Y.The differential effects of public R＆D support on firm R＆D:theory and evidence from multi-country data[J].Technovation,2011,31 (5):256-269. [3]CZARNITZKI D,HANEL P,ROSA J M.Evaluating the impact of R＆D TI credits on innovation:a microeconometric study on Canadian firms[J].Research policy,2011,40 (2):217-229. [4]孙梦男,姚海鑫,赵利娟.政治关联、并购战略选择与企业价值[J].经济理论与经济管理,2017 (6):19-32. [5]李健,杨蓓蓓,潘镇.政府补助、股权集中度与企业创新可持续性[J].中国软科学,2016 (6):180-192. [6]LIU Q,TANG J,TIAN G.Does political capital create value in the IPO market? Evidence from China[J].Journal of corporate finance,2013,23:395-413. [7]KHWAJA A,MIAN A.Tracing the impact of bank liquidity shocks:evidence from an emerging market[J].American economic review,2008,98 (4):1413-1442. [8]余明桂,回雅甫,潘红波.政治联系、寻租与地方政府财政补贴有效性[J].经济研究,2010 (3):65-77. [9]郭海,王超,房唯佳.政治关联能持续改善企业绩效吗——企业发展阶段与行业环境的作用研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2019 (12):45-58. [10]KIM C F,ZHANG L.Corporate political connections and tax aggressiveness[J].Contemporary accounting research,33 (1),78-114. [11]PFEFFER J.Merger as a response to organizational interdepence[J].Administrative science quarterly,1972 (3):218-228 [12]BODDEWYN J J,BREWER T L.International business political behaviour:new theoretical directions[J].Academy of management review,1994 (1):119-143. [13]黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016,51 (4):60-73. [14]余明桂,范蕊,钟慧洁.中国产业政策与企业技术创新[J].中国工业经济,2016 (12):5-22. [15]HSU D H,ZIEDONIS R H.Resources as dual sources of advantage:implications for valuing enterpreneurial firm patents[J].Strategic management journal,2013,34 (7):761-781. [16]郭捷,杨立成.环境规制、政府研发资助对绿色技术创新的影响——基于中国内地省级层面数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37 (10):37-44. [17]DUNDAS N H,ROPER S.Output additionality of public support for innovation:evidence for irish manufacturing plants[J].European planning studies,2010,18 (1):107-122 [18]江雅雯,黄燕,徐雯.政治联系、制度因素与企业的创新活动[J].南方经济,2011 (11):3-15. [19]袁建国,后青松,程晨.企业政治资源的诅咒效应——基于政治关联与企业技术创新的考察[J].管理世界,2015 (1):139-155. [20]陈朝月,许治.政府R&D资助政策对企业共性技术项目决策的影响探究[J].管理评论,2019,31 (9):70-80. [21]周海涛,张振刚.政府研发资助方式对企业创新投入与创新绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2015,12 (12):1797-1804. [22]郑春美,李佩.政府补助与税收优惠对企业创新绩效的影响——基于创业板高新技术企业的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32 (16):83-87. [23]陈红,张玉,刘东霞.政府补助、税收优惠与企业创新绩效——不同生命周期阶段的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2019,22 (3):187-200. [24]陈国青,曾大军,卫强,等.大数据环境下的决策范式转变与使能创新[J].管理世界,2020,36 (2):95-105+211. [25]陈强远,林思彤,张醒.中国技术创新激励政策:激励了数量还是质量[J].中国工业经济,2020 (4):79-96. [26]TONG T W,HE W,HE Z L,et al.Patent regime shift and firm innovation:evidence from the second amendment to China's patent law[J].Academy of management annual meeting proceedings,2014 (1):14174-14174. [27]葛结根.并购对目标上市公司融资约束的缓解效应[J].会计研究,2017 (8):68-73+95. [28]解学梅,王若怡,霍佳阁.政府财政激励下的绿色工艺创新与企业绩效:基于内容分析法的实证研究[J].管理评论,2020,32 (5):109-124.
2021, 
