Does the Reform of Classified Evaluation of Scientific And Technological Talents Promote the High Quality Development of Scientific Research Level in Universities ——Based on the Quasi Natural Experiment of 9 Universities Reform
Li Hongjin1, Li Shenghui2, Xu Lin1
1. School of Economics and Finance,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006,China;
2. School of Public Affairs and Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,China
Abstract：In September 2014,China carried out the pilot reform of classified evaluation for scientific and technological talents at nine universities for the first time,and the pilot reform formed a quasi-natural experiment.Based on this quasi-natural experiment,this paper uses the PSM-DID method to conduct policy evaluation on the reform of classified evaluation for scientific and technological talents,and studies the mechanism of action of the reform.According to the empirical results,it is found that the reform of classified evaluation for scientific and technological talents leads to an improvement of the scientific and technological level specifically by improving the efficiency of human resources and capital,which also lead to a higher development for the overall scientific and technological level in universities,but there is a time lag effect.The research results provide empirical evidence and important policy enlightenment for China to continue to promote the reform of science and technology classification evaluation.
李红锦, 李胜会, 许林. 科技人才分类评价改革能否促进高校科研水平的高质量发展——基于9所高校改革试点的准自然实验[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(10): 114-123.
Li Hongjin,Li Shenghui,Xu Lin. Does the Reform of Classified Evaluation of Scientific And Technological Talents Promote the High Quality Development of Scientific Research Level in Universities ——Based on the Quasi Natural Experiment of 9 Universities Reform. , 2021(10): 114-123.
[1]SIRILLI G.Innovation indicators in science and technology evaluation[J].Scientometrics,1999,45 (3):439-443.
[2]MRYGLOD O,KENNA R,HOLOVATCH Y,et al.Absolute and specific measures of research group excellence[J].Scientometrics,2013,95 (1):115-127.
[3]陈兆莹.关于科技评价和科技评价改革的讨论[J].科学通报,2018,63 (7):611-617.
[4]李强,郑海军,李晓轩.科技政策研究评价方法评析[J].科学学研究,2018,36 (2):221-227+295.
[5]王冬梅,王向宁.基于灰色系统的行业特色高校科技分类评价探索[J].科研管理,2019 (3):126-132.
[6]MEDSKER G J,WILLIAMS L J,HOLAHAN P J.A review of current practices for evaluating causal modes in organizational behavior and human resources management research[J].Journal of management,1994,20 (2):439-464.
[7]ANDR J,FROCHOT C.Problems arising in evaluation of interdisciplinary scientific research for innovation[J].International journal of innovation science,2013,5 (2):103-112.
[8]GARCFIELD E.Citation indexing:its theory and application in science,technology and humanities[J].Bioscience,1991,41 (4):229-231.
[9]刘兰剑,杜向民.澳大利亚ERA分类科研评价体系及其启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36 (12):24-32.
[10]李杏林,贡毅.美国NIH、NSF评审制度研究及对深圳的启示[J].科研管理,2019 (8):293-296.
[11]沈秋坦,周荣庭.卓越导向的大学科研评价框架研究[J].研究生教育研究,2013 (5):63-68.
[12]陈琨,李晓轩,杨国梁.中外大学技术转移效率比较研究——基于DEA-Malmquist方法[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35 (7):98-106.
[13]赵聚辉,黄诗华.基于超效率DEA和Malmquist 指数的中国科技研发效率评价研究[J].宏观经济研究,2019 (9):123-129.
[14]王楚君,许治,陈丽玉.基于标杆管理的中国研究型大学科技成果转化效率评价——网络排序方法的运用[J].科研管理,2020 (3):183-193.
[15]程萍,康世功.改革开放40年中国科技体制改革的经验和启示[J].北京文化创意,2018 (5):9-11.
[16]郭嘉.公共R&D绩效评价相关研究综述[J].科技管理研究,2014,34 (1):52-57+61.
[17]杨月坤.创新型科技人才多元评价系统的构建与实施[J].经济论坛,2018 (11):90-95.
[18]杜鹏,李凤.是自上而下的管理还是科学共同体的自治——对中国科技评价问题的重新审视[J].科学学研究,2016,34 (5):641-646+667.
[19]张艳,杨允仙,唐安,等.新形势下科研经费管理评价研究[J].科研管理,2016 (S1):296-300.
[20]MOSER P,VOENA A.Compulsory licensing:evidence from the trading with the enemy act[J].American economic review,2012,102 (1):396-427.
[21]李卫兵,王鹏.提高排污费会抑制FDI流入吗?——基于PSM-DID方法的估计[J].西安交通大学学报 (社会科学版),2020,40 (3):91-100.
[22]VANDENBERGHE V.Alternatives to polynomial trend-corrected differences-in-differences models[J].Applied economics letters,2019,26 (5):358-361.
2021, 
